if for some reason the game does not add up and the game goes minus sitting and waiting for me to recoup and get up, this is a bad ideaFor example, you have lost a significant part of your stack. The desire to recoup always appears. Do you play more confidently or only worse? What are the pros or cons of not leaving the table until you win back?
The idea of bankroll management suggests that you enter the game only with the money you can afford to loose.the idea is good, but what happens if you lose your whole bankroll?
You can easily go on tilt and lose a number of buy-ins. You should absolutely have a stop loss amount.
Also the less 'fresh' you are, the more prone to mistakes you are, so a longer session trying to 'get back to even' will likely have steady decrease in your decision making quality.
Also the table conditions could be bad - if you are up against better players, there is a good chance they will keep winning against you.
Hello Gamer. You've hit the nail on the head by reducing the range of playing hands. Super-tight mode is enabled. If someone uses HUD, it is easier to bluff against him. I'm not focused on my hands, but on what the opponent can have. The small number of playing hands led to the fact that my longest win back lasted 15 hours. Good luck in cash games.Hi Vallet. In my opinion, trying to get your money back is one of the hardest things to do, because you are focusing on the lost money instead of the money you can win after that point. What that causes, is that you will stop playing some hands that are calling hands, or you could even call a small raise with. hands like J10. But just don't get in there very deep. GL to you