PLEASE more people play Omaha. Here's Why.

G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
I would like to see Omaha have a boom the way Hold Em did a few years ago. There are some very compelling reasons to play Omaha, especially my game of choice, Pot Limit Hi/Lo.

Listen.

1. If you are a studious player who works to be a winning player, Omaha Hi/Lo is 50 to 100% more profitable with about half the variance or risk. For an explanation of why, check out the Hwang book or the Cappelletti book among many others.

2. If you are an action junkie, Omaha Hi/Lo is by far a better game for you. You see almost every flop pretty cheaply. With practically every hand you have an exciting draw for those who like fishing expeditions. More hands go to showdown. And even if you're a terrible player, you'll receive gratification by stumbling into a fair number of half-pot wins.

We need you in Omaha, especially the beginners. The learning curve ain't too bad, and we will be nice and friendly and very appreciative while you're learning the game. I notice that there's much less donkey talk and tapping on the glass in Omaha than in Hold Em.

Now I would ask and advise you to please not play pre-flop in Omaha like you do in Hold Em, especially the split pot game. It disrupts the game and it's not at all in your interest. Some experts debate about whether you should ever raise pre-flop in Omaha. bluffing doesn't work as well because your opponents will almost always have hands with potential. Makes sense since one Omaha hand contains six two-card combinations. Besides, it's really not in your interest to be stealing small pots pre-flop. You want to build pots by inviting people in, then if you hit your hand milk it or play it big. The Hold Em-style aggressors stand out like a sore thumb. You'll have some fun but invariably get nailed.

What the heck am I doing? I'm inviting you in because I want more beginners, i.e. bad players in the game, yet I'm giving you a little advice about how not to totally suck. I must be crazy! Or maybe just a little too kind. But you are all CCers, and I want you all to do well (just not at my expense). So tell your friends about Omaha Hi/Lo and let's get this train rolling!

Gary
This is my landmark 500th post. Does this qualify me for the next level of tourneys or something? Anybody want some cake?
 
beardyian

beardyian

Scary Clown
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Total posts
15,845
Awards
2
Chips
0
Anybody want some cake?

You have cake?? :p

Yes Omaha Hi/Lo is a good game to play it can aid a player in learning to read flops and the way the board can play.

The one tip i do have is always play for the hi hand ;)
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
I tried playing PLO8 but its absolutely retardedly boring. Limp, see a flop, fold. Rinse & repeat. Players are so absolutely terrible at that game, that you just make strong 2 way hands & take their money. PLO8 is the furthest thing from an action game that there could possibly be. You have to have a hand that is in contention for both pots, and that doesn't happen super often. So you spend most of your time seeing flops & dumping hands, bluffing a few rare dry flops. I guess it could be okay playing heads up or super short handed, but the game makes me >_X.

An action game is like Stud 8, where its a limit game, so you can play for half, and there's tons of jamming in multi-way pots.

If I wanted to nut-camp all day, I'd play PLO8. But I don't want to nut camp, so I play NLHE 6-max, where I can raise/raise/raise/4-bet light/raise/raise/raise.

EDIT: I've included a nice post about how to play PLO8 by Steve Badger. He makes it pretty clear that PLO8 is not an action game.

Steve Badger from www.playwinningpoker.com said:
Proper PLO8 play is directly counter to this [seeing lots of showdowns], which is why most players are not suited for the game. You should easily fold most of the hands you play. PLO8 is mostly a game of homeruns. Big pots. Big edges. Big betting. You aren't looking to hit many PLO8 doubles. You don't want to mix it up in a lot of pots. You want to get out early, or be gladly shoving all your chips in by the end.

This post is an excerpt from here.
However, I do agree that Omaha 8 in general has less variance and super idiotic players. I had no trouble winning at a healthy rate when I played 25$ PLO8. However, I got bored out of my skull in the process.
 
Last edited:
HalifaxLeafs

HalifaxLeafs

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Total posts
66
Chips
0
i have played O b4 and have won huge pots very quickly..only to lose huge pots very quickly..the game is BRUTAL..i reccomend all Noobs stay away from this game..as i would avoid RAZZ like plague..all the O players will hate me for scaring off potential fish..but i cant help it..i got murdered @ every O table i have ever played..ANd that is NO FUN!!!...a game with alot more variance than i can handle..Best of luck to every1..Halifaxleafs
 
G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
c9,
you're absolutely right - action play is not the right way to win at Omaha. But if you're a wild hold em player, you can be an even wilder Omaha player and see a lot more flops and showdowns. Not good play, but the kind of play I'm hoping to instill in my opponents.

Bear,
Always go for the high is exactly the wrong advice. Pre-flop you're looking for hands with two-way potential, but a good low is what gives you the freedom to try for the high. I'd rather start with A236 than KKQQ. With your high pairs you could hit a set, which is usually worthless at a full table. But having good low potential allows you to take more draws for the high.

High hands are valuable because they can scoop if the board doesn't make a low, but the flop in Omaha changes so many things that you can't really rely too much on those pre-flop highs. Even AA doesn't have a whole lot of value.

Post-flop, I would rather have a good high draw than a low draw. If you have a naked A2 and plan on drawing all the way to the river to try to win half the pot, that is really bad play - but a lot of people do it. For one thing, your odds of making a low without getting counterfeited are only 50:50. Then there's always the possibility, especially in a multi-way pot, of getting quartered. Many reasons not to chase a low. But if you can hit your low with counterfeit protection, it gives you all kind of freedom to draw for the high as well.

That's my opinion.
 
silverslugger33

silverslugger33

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
451
Chips
0
Eh, I'm not a big Omaha fan. I've gone through fazes (hold em, then stud, then omaha), but hold em was my favorite by a fair amount. I play some HORSE at this point, because it combines the skills I've learned by playing all the different games, but given the choice of just one game, it's got to by hold em. Omaha just bothers me because too often can you be ahead without actually having a hand yet. I don't want to assume every flush possibility or straight possibility hit.
 
G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
I didn't say I enjoyed Omaha the most or that it's the most fun. I play it simply because it's the most profitable, therefore the best use of my time.

Slugger, you're absolutely right, you can be ahead with no way to protect your hand and are often beat by drawing hands. That's all part of the equation. It's not uncommon for an Omaha player to fold the nut on the flop if it's a scary board with poor chances of your hand improving. In Omaha the draws can be huge. Straight draws can have 13, 16 or more outs. Add in flushes and fullhouses and there are situations where nearly half the deck will make your hand. It's different from Hold Em that way. In Hold Em, the made hand is usually favored. In Omaha the drawing hand is often favored, and what beginning players consider a bad beat may not be a bad beat at all.

I know there are a lot of successful Omaha players on CardsChat, but today we seem to be a group of naysayers. That's OK, though. It's better than preaching to the choir.

I am a winning Hold Em player. I can win as much or more in Omaha without the wild fluctuations. I would grant that correct play is somewhat boring and it's harder to be creative in Omaha. It's less about bluffs and aggression and more about hand selection and big draws. I'm drifting toward Omaha simply because online poker is like going to work for me, and I'm making better money with less fluctuation at Omaha. But if your thing is fun and Hold Em is more fun for you, then of course that's what you should play. Even when I played mainly HE, I liked to get a little variety though.

Peace and Bountiful Blessings,
Gary
 
silverslugger33

silverslugger33

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
451
Chips
0
I completely understand what you're saying Gary, and I think the main difference between us is why we're playing online poker. Like you said, for you, it's like going to work. For me, I am playing for enjoyment, and I'm a profitable hold em player, so even if I might be able to win a little more, I might as well stick with hold em.
 
pfb8888

pfb8888

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Total posts
1,132
Chips
0
running out of suckers are we ?

this post reinforces my belief that poker in inherently evil...a pyramid scheme where the experienced prey on the beginner....

capatilism at its worst

do you ever feel like a leech? taking money from stupid people to the benefit of some corporation...

ok i feel better now...had to get that out.

back to work theres more suckers out there to skin!
 
G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
running out of suckers are we ?

this post reinforces my belief that poker in inherently evil...a pyramid scheme where the experienced prey on the beginner....

capatilism at its worst

do you ever feel like a leech? taking money from stupid people to the benefit of some corporation...

ok i feel better now...had to get that out.

back to work theres more suckers out there to skin!

What is this all about? Of course I'd like to see more bad players in the game. But I'm also happy to help people progress if they are interested. Lord knows I've sure gotten a lot of help in the development of my game - and I have a long way to go, too.

And if you're accusing me of being deceitful and manipulative, you're not a very good reader as my intentions are clearly stated and mixed with some humor. What are you even doing on a poker forum if your letter describes your feelings about poker?

But alas, I think you jest too. Or are you really the scurrilous scoundrel that lambastes me as you hurry back to skin more suckers yourself.

If you see any, just send them on over to the Omaha tables. That's all I ask.
Gary
 
E

ecoutee72

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Total posts
77
Chips
0
I like Omaha hi/lo but there does seem to be way too many possiblities to me. If I were going to play a split pot game it would have to be stud hi/lo. I tend to like this game a little more. And still find many people come into the pot with any 3 cards.
 
Divebitch

Divebitch

Miss you, Buckster,,,,,
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Total posts
3,130
Awards
1
Chips
1
But alas, I think you jest too. Or are you really the scurrilous scoundrel that lambastes me as you hurry back to skin more suckers yourself.

If you see any, just send them on over to the Omaha tables. That's all I ask.
Gary

Excellent posts all of yours. And pretty funny too. Didn't know you were such a card. :p I'm guessing 8888's posts was slightly alcohol induced, but I could be wrong.

"The Hold Em-style aggressors stand out like a sore thumb." Can you spot pocket aces a mile away too? lol

C9h, I read a lot of Steve Badger's pages, and wow - he blows Hwang out of the water. I think he contradicts himself at times. But the strategic stuff is top notch, including the differences between limit & PL.
 
trucker103

trucker103

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Total posts
1,029
Chips
0
ive tried omaha h/l not bad but plo8 no good way too slow for me but h/l good change of scenery and does make u think a hole lot more and i am sure that sometimes i stick out from what u call holdem aggressors but im learning cashed in a few of the sat, night games on players only
 
DawgBones

DawgBones

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Total posts
2,183
Chips
0
I use to play Omaha but got tired of people badmouthing my play. After reading this post I know that some of what they said was justified. You stated the Holdem approach doesn't work and that's exactly what I was doing. I may give it another chance after a little reading cause I did enjoy it for the most part. Maybe you could tell all your O8 buddies to keep the name calling to a minimum though...I'm very sensitive,sniff,sniff. :)
 
Divebitch

Divebitch

Miss you, Buckster,,,,,
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Total posts
3,130
Awards
1
Chips
1
I use to play Omaha but got tired of people badmouthing my play. After reading this post I know that some of what they said was justified. You stated the Holdem approach doesn't work and that's exactly what I was doing. I may give it another chance after a little reading cause I did enjoy it for the most part. Maybe you could tell all your O8 buddies to keep the name calling to a minimum though...I'm very sensitive,sniff,sniff. :)

Awwww.... I know exactly what you mean. In fact, there was 1 incidence of exactly that at our (CC) PL Omaha HL game last Friday at FT. Someone was lambasted for a bad move and I don't remember if he sucked out or not. But he admitted he was new to Omaha HL, so I came to his defense. Take a look at Steve Badger's pages (link above), it should help tremendously. And no, you cannot approach it anything like Hold'em. But if you enjoy it, keep at it. I'm not the greatest, but I do enjoy it. And yes, it is usually profitable, as I don't totally suck at it.
 
hipshot55

hipshot55

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Total posts
445
Chips
0
I sincerely wish to thank glworden for this thread and c9h13no3 and Divebitch for their contributions to it. Omaha is a game I was completely unfamiliar with until very recently and is one I am in a constant battle to grasp. I especially struggle with PLO8 which I feel like I should at least understand the basics of, as I am a more than competent Stud H/L player. Your posts and comments have helped a great deal and c9h13no3's link to the Steve Badger site was of incredible value.

Other than some posts and magazine articles on another forum (whose name adds up to four), this thread has helped me far more than the one book specific to Omaha that I have read so far.

Keep up the good work. :D
 
G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
I use to play Omaha but got tired of people badmouthing my play. After reading this post I know that some of what they said was justified. You stated the Holdem approach doesn't work and that's exactly what I was doing. I may give it another chance after a little reading cause I did enjoy it for the most part. Maybe you could tell all your O8 buddies to keep the name calling to a minimum though...I'm very sensitive,sniff,sniff. :)

I don't really get upset by holdem aggressor approach. I do think if the person realized what they were doing they'd be embarrassed. But if somebody's doing that, I just play tighter. It does disrupt the game for a lot of people, though, because much more so than holdem, Omaha is a game of implied odds. People not only want to see flops, they usually want to have several callers for bigger pots. Omaha is much more a post-flop game. Big pre-flop bets on a bad hand are a waste of money, and big pre-flop bets on good hands are just plain stupid. Omaha hands pay off after the flop, not before. The holdem maniac doesn't get much respect because they are really shooting themselves in the foot and they don't even know it. So they come along and you just kind of put up with it until they bust out, and every once in a while somebody will complain or perhaps try to offer helpful advice. Most players at the table know when a fish sits down. It's much more obvious than in holdem. And if anybody starts ragging on them, you often get other players reminding them not to tap on the glass.

I DO want you to learn - just not right now at my table. There's a guy on here named TigerBob who is a good Omaha Player and he will let people sweat him.

Despite all the complex hand possibilities, correct actions in Omaha are pretty cut-and-dry - so I think of it as an easier game - and there aren't as many places for you to get creative. Position is important, but pushing with a bad hand in a pot steal might get you cracked. Those kinds of aggressive things that work in Holdem often backfire in Omaha. I want my opponent to be the Holdem guy who thinks his second nut flush might not be good but he can take down the pot with a check-raise. Omaha players like people who call big bets with second best hands.

Cappelletti explained it this way. In HoldEm, you want people to fear you. In Omaha you want them to love you.

I'm making it sound pretty boring, aren't I? Frankly, when I'm playing well, it is boring and profitable. But we need more wild players and calling stations who will see a lot more cards here than they do in HoldEm.

Gary
 
silverslugger33

silverslugger33

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
451
Chips
0
running out of suckers are we ?

this post reinforces my belief that poker in inherently evil...a pyramid scheme where the experienced prey on the beginner....

capatilism at its worst

do you ever feel like a leech? taking money from stupid people to the benefit of some corporation...

ok i feel better now...had to get that out.

back to work theres more suckers out there to skin!

Why shouldn't the experienced prey on the suckers?:confused:
 
DawgBones

DawgBones

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Total posts
2,183
Chips
0
I DO want you to learn - just not right now at my table.



Gary
See this is exactly what I'm talking about...nobody likes me:bawling:
But really,thank you Gary and Dive for the encouragement and will start dabbling in it soon. Btw where do you two play FT,PS or other?
 
P

paumarhas

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Total posts
682
Chips
0
omaha is definately coming up, and people are becoming more familiar with it.
you make some very good points and i do like omaha. it's just i still need more pratice in HE, and it took me quite awhile to get were i'm at right now.
i do play a little horse and some of the omaha freerolls. so i guess i can try the micro games.
there's been a lot of pros who suggest playing other games in order to avoid becoming bored and allowing your game to suffer.
all it would be is allowing a little change and variance, what's so bad about that. hmmmmmmmmmmm makes you think.
thanks for bringing omaha to my attention - good luck on the felt.
peace :)
 
G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
See this is exactly what I'm talking about...nobody likes me:bawling:
But really,thank you Gary and Dive for the encouragement and will start dabbling in it soon. Btw where do you two play FT,PS or other?

I play at bodog for the simple reason that there are a lot of loose players. Flop percentages from the 50s to the 80s. But not much action certain times of day. More to choose from at pokerstars, but tighter tables. Hard to find flops % above 50.
 
FEARFACTOR

FEARFACTOR

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Total posts
362
Awards
1
Chips
0
I play OHL8 sometimes, but just hate the preflop raisers. I have heard that the preflop raise in OHL8 is the worst bet in poker. I tend to agree except for about 4 hands that I will raise on. I have been told that I am wrong about the preflop raise. Anyone else?
 
G

glworden

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Total posts
619
Chips
0
I play OHL8 sometimes, but just hate the preflop raisers. I have heard that the preflop raise in OHL8 is the worst bet in poker. I tend to agree except for about 4 hands that I will raise on. I have been told that I am wrong about the preflop raise. Anyone else?

EXACTLY! Very little value with pre-flop raises in Omaha. Especially in a pot limit game. That's how you recognize the holdem crossovers; they play that aggressive game and just don't know any better.

Especially if you're playing the low side of the hand, you want as many callers as possible. Get it down to heads up and you are by definition playing a game you can't win. IF you make your low and IF you don't get quartered, you'll only get back your own bets minus the rake.

And why raise on the high side, since no pre-flop hand is that big a favorite over any other? You need to see the flop to see how your hand shapes up. And if it does shape up, you want a multi-way pot. Again, the more people contributing, the better, especially since you're still likely to win only half.

You'll rarely scoop pre-flop in Omaha, so why try? Get it down to heads up and you limit your profit potential. You almost always want to be playing multi-way pots, so if you ARE raising pre-flop, it should be at a table where you expect a lot of callers to build the pot.
 
dropdead1

dropdead1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Total posts
188
Chips
0
Glworden, you are so right with point no 2 in your original post. I have been watching Ivey and Hansen playing on Full Tilt and sometimes have to scrape my jaw off the floor at the money flying around that table. And it seems like any cards are good. They really must be action junkies!
 
Divebitch

Divebitch

Miss you, Buckster,,,,,
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Total posts
3,130
Awards
1
Chips
1
See this is exactly what I'm talking about...nobody likes me:bawling:
But really,thank you Gary and Dive for the encouragement and will start dabbling in it soon. Btw where do you two play FT,PS or other?

I like you just fine. In fact, you are more than welcome to learn at my table. :D Haven't played at FT for some strange reason I can't answer. :confused: But I will probably start. Been playing at UB and PS.

I play at Bodog for the simple reason that there are a lot of loose players. Flop percentages from the 50s to the 80s. But not much action certain times of day. More to choose from at Pokerstars, but tighter tables. Hard to find flops % above 50.

Now, I've always equated low flop %s to a maniac or 2 at the table who keeps raising, so everyone folds. There's no way, especially in Omaha HL that any hand would be totally folded to the BB. Am I missing something?

I play OHL8 sometimes, but just hate the preflop raisers. I have heard that the preflop raise in OHL8 is the worst bet in poker. I tend to agree except for about 4 hands that I will raise on. I have been told that I am wrong about the preflop raise. Anyone else?

I rarely raise pre-flop, but there are instances you should do it. In limit, you should always do it with a strong hand. In pot limit, with a strong hand, especially in late position, I never bet pot if several have called in front of me. I will however do a min-raise or a little more. This is NOT to push anyone out of the hand. Like Gary says, you want the multi-way pot, especially if your hand is far stronger for either the hi or the lo, but not both. Rather, I do it so that in the event I hit my flop, I can come out with a fat raise to either 1) push people out and take the pot down, or 2) build a bigger pot faster, if I see fit. If I don't hit any part of the flop, I can then get off the hand with no major loss. In EP, I'll only raise with a very premium hand. Not sure my advice is any good, but that is my level of comfort.

P.S. Gary, I keep forgetting to say congrats on your 500th, a fine post it was.
 
Top