This is a discussion on Playing LAG: Hand Chart within the online poker forums, in the Cash Games section; Okay, so we all know that playing tight & aggressive gives you the best shot to be profitable online, ect. ect. No debates there. But sometimes |
|
Playing LAG: Hand Chart |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Playing LAG: Hand Chart
Okay, so we all know that playing tight & aggressive gives you the best shot to be profitable online, ect. ect. No debates there.
But sometimes I just get bored playing nothing but the premium hands, and I play a lot of live home games against a regular crew of guys, so loosening up and seeing more flops, I think, has some possible benefits. For the sake of this argument, I'm talking about ring games, not tournaments. So first, what advantages are there to playing loose, and is there a playstyle that we can adopt to maximize these advantages? And can we make some comments about what sort of hands we're willing to play against the usual TAGS? I'll start with the first question I posed: What advantage is there to playing loose? 1) Implied odds. If we can get into a flop cheaply, we may flop 2-pair, a straight, ect. and we can really milk a lot of value when TAG players hit weaker (but still good) holdings. 2) Picking off C-bets. When flops come low, much of a TAG's range will miss that flop. However, a lot of tight aggressive players will C-bet anyways. And while you can still pick off C-bets while playing tight too, a check-raise will look more formidable when you may actually be holding something dangerous on the 865 flop. 3) Bluffing scare cards will look scarier to TAG opponents if they know we're holding a wide range of hands. 4) Players are bit more surprised when we're actually holding big hands like AA & AK if we've been playing 97 off suit all the time. ---------------- In this thread, I want to clear up what kinds of hands we're looking to play against the types of TAG opponents that frequent my home game. Obviously, suited connectors are great, and we're probably playing all but the lowest of them, but I wanted to bring up a few hands for discussion that I thought we should really think about playing if we're trying to maximize the advantages I spoke about above. 1) 2) 3) 4) ---------------- I think that's enough for now, as this post is probably far beyond the length requirements of most members as it is. So yeah, comments? Thoughts? I already know I'm way over-thinking this as it is, but I can't sleep, so why not spam up the forums with a bunch of rambling, right? And what's the harm in actually thinking through these sorts of things that you never really think through anyways?
__________________
|
Similar Threads for: Playing LAG: Hand Chart | ||||
Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | |
Four chart colours | 4 | December 14th, 2021 6:48 PM | Online Poker | |
using cardchat raise call fold chart | 1 | April 29th, 2021 7:06 PM | Online Poker |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
my playing style is definately very lag, but there is a fine line between a succesful lag player and a fish. As a lag player, you dont need to be calling any raises pre flop with anything but premiums, since it ruins the change of being the agressor. I very very very rarely call raises pre flop, i generally fold to them or re raise them. Also as a lag player, that doesnt mean you should be raising every hand, you still want to be selective with your hands, but it generally means you want to be raising pre flop when first into pot with hands such as j,t q,t 7,8, 2,2, a,a, 5,7s and also you generally need to be playing position and make sure you arent oop as a lag player as people will not give you credit for hands, so you need for them to act first. So you want to still only play hands that can be succesful on the flop.
Also you said you can call a raise from tag player with ace rag, big nono since that generally means you are dominated
__________________
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Forget which book I read that mentioned this, but there is definitely a fine line between a good LAG player and a fish. But the majority of hands shown down by the LAG player will be the better hand, and the fish will just call down because "hey, I could win". The LAG player, although very loose and aggressive, doesn't like aggression and will often fold to a re-raise PF because, as mentioned above, it takes away their shot to be the aggressor.
The theory behind LAG strategy is "you win when you hit, and you win when your opponents miss". Obviously this is the vast majority of the time, but it's not easy to play. I think TAG is still slightly more profitable (but as a TAG you must also open up a little with position), but it's not just because all the players are loose, which sometimes isn't even true. The profitability from playing LAG also comes from the image. If you have an image of being loose, playing a lot of hands, opponents will sometimes make the mistake of thinking you're just a wild player. As mentioned above though, most of the times they reach showdown they do have the goods. Obviously this won't work against really excellent players, as they will observe the fact that you make sure you have the better hands in the big pots and that you don't like aggression in return. LAG mainly relies on winning a lot of small pots and then using that image to pick up big pots they wouldn't win otherwise. So your opponents can't be observant enough to pick up on exactly how you're playing, but they have to be observant enough to realize that you're playing and raising a wide range of hands. That's the problem with playing LAG online, at least at the lower levels, not sure of like 200nl and up. But I really like the style live, especially when you have other people trying to play by the book in a TAG style. I like to start off the session extremely loose, try to show at least one bluff in the first 5-10 minutes. The style is what is described in Sklansky's NL theory and practice as making an obvious mistake to induce costly mistakes. You make the theoretical "mistake" of playing too many hands, and most inexperienced players see this and try to take advantage of it by making the more costly mistakes of playing bigger pots with worse hands. By playing more hands you then lose more small pots (unless you're playing weak-tight players in which case you'll steal blinds a lot more and you may actually be playing a good theoretical preflop strategy) but sacrifice it to win the bigger pots. The TAG style is easily beaten if it is obvious you are playing TAG, you just don't play hands with them unless you have a great preflop hand. Played with someone the other day who played exactly 4 hands all night (like 6 hours): JJ, AK, and AA twice. Yet people were paying him off like they didn't know he had a premium hand when he raised preflop. Now most TAG players aren't THAT tight, and they usually mix it up once in a while to throw opponents off, but the great thing about the TAG style, is that even against observant opponents, you're coming close to breaking even. If you play LAG against good opponents who can crack you, you're going to lose a lot of money. TAG and at worst you lose pretty much just blinds. So although TAG is probably the most likely to win in the long run, LAG is probably going to win the most money in the long run against semi-observant, but not good, opponents. Variance is definitely higher, but I believe in general in the live games I've played, LAG is the most profitable, hands down.
__________________
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
re: Poker & Playing LAG: Hand Chart
I think you're stressing too much on certain types of hands and not enough on situations in general. I think things like position, your opponents tendencies and game flow are much more important.
Like zach said, you win when you hit, but you also win when your opponent misses which means that we don't really need all that much hand selection. To give you a very general answer, I'd say that as a lag we should be going down the same road TAGs take in late position, but just take it x steps farther depending on how passive your table is. I mean hell, you don't need hand selection if you're on the button with two tagfish in the blinds - we can raise literally any two cards. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
very very good post zach +rep
__________________
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, I realize that when you loosen up, and who you target when you loosen up is more important than the actual cards being played. However, maybe I'm trying to be too selective.
For example, I'm in my home game, and one of the typical textbook TAG's is on the button, where I know he will play most any 2 face cards to see a flop with. Thus, I don't mind raising with T8s, since I can mostly likely win a small pot when he misses, and a big pot when we both hit. However, I'm probably not going to try this move with 72os, because it has less of a chance of hitting big in that "when we both hit the flop" scenario. I always thought of the drawing ability of the cards most lags play as the "backup plan" for when we can't take down the pot with just a c-bet. The trick is, should I be making that move with just any 2 cards? Or should I actually be selective about my starting hand criteria, even when I'm not playing the cards so much as playing the situation & the player?
__________________
|
#9
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
In fact I've found most of the time we can push with any 2 cards simply preflop and be profitable. The magic number for both of them is 18.35%. If they both have that percentage chance of calling your PFR it's exactly even money (well it's 18.35034191... but we can ignore these). If one is higher and the other is lower you can use the equation I used above with 7% and 14%. But the point is I haven't seen many people calling preflop raises over 18% of the time, most of the numbers I've seen are below 10%. You can do all sorts of math, knowing of course that cbets sometimes work and that you will hit the flop a certain amount of the time. Even with 27o, a flop of 277 is possible. So it just depends, how tight are your opponents, how passive are they preflop so they'll fold your cbet? It just depends.
Remember, in NLHE the showdown numbers hardly mean a thing. Being dominated isn't bad just because your showdown equity is lower, it's because when you think you hit you're beat. If you call with suited connectors vs. AA, you're hoping for 2 pair, trips, a flush, a straight, or a flush and/or straight draw and an opponent to give you odds to call. Even if you're 90:10, if you know whether you're ahead on the flop and your opponent doesn't, you have implied odds. If you push with 67 and the flop comes 589, he doesn't know you hit your straight. He will pay you off. Even if you are as bad as 90:10 preflop (don't think that's possible, but shh
__________________
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
small ball is for you!
__________________
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
After watching the small ball videos by Daniel (I can call him that 'cause we're both Canadian eh). And tried it in some free roll tourneys tonight. You would think that against other loose fish this system wouldn't work, well just the opposite !! I was in the top 5 in chips most of the night, they couldn't hand me their chips fast enough.
I still have to let go of some hands earlier, but the loose aggressive style can work. Position is really important. Look at those videos, they are great and have fun at some free rolls.
__________________
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
re: Poker & Playing LAG: Hand Chart
I agree with Zach, Chuck and Switch - for the most part it's about aggression and finding the right situations. Not the cards themselves.
That said, there's a few hands that I think make for problems with this style: hands in the JT/T9/T8 range specifically, because often when they hit, they're hitting the bottom end of the flops that our TAG opponents are hitting. I find something like 78 much easier to play.
__________________
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I play LAG if it is many Tight players on the table,,,,,, But the only problem is that you cant be just as aggressive if you play LAG than you can do when you play TAG It is better to play LAG -with a neutral post flop play.......... That is because you cant lay down every pot when people now you are a LAG player.. I only take down the pot if the people in the pott are bluffable ore the flop is bluffable.
__________________
<X////>< <X////>< <X////>< |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I think this is a high quality thread totally.LAG style is extremely profitable throughout games and tourneys,but the trick is to refrain from crazy bluffs when your way behind and wont to win,or you have a marginal hand and are trying to bluff as if to have the nuts and you get caught.But getting caught once or twice isnt all that bad,as it can give you more profit down the line as the TAG"s will call you a little more frequently thinking you have a stink or marginal hand.Great input Chuck and Switch
__________________
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I will say that the key here is read on the player.
If you play LAG without reads on the players you are a donk in my opinion
__________________
<X////>< <X////>< <X////>< |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
1. You are aggressive preflop
2. You are not passive postflop, you are in between ( neutral) 3.It is wery few players who masters LAG, so I dont now if the neutral postflop play will make you more money.
__________________
<X////>< <X////>< <X////>< |
Similar Threads for: Playing LAG: Hand Chart > Texas Hold'em Poker | ||||
Thread | Replies | Last Post | Forum | |
Four chart colours | 4 | December 14th, 2021 6:48 PM | Online Poker | |
using cardchat raise call fold chart | 1 | April 29th, 2021 7:06 PM | Online Poker |