This is the best comment. Just reminds me that balance is key. Now that I have read this I start to meditate on the fact that a extremely Intilectuial will limp. For the longest I believed that limping was weak however from this I understand that you really have to evaluate your ops in order to make better pre flop choices. ThanksMost importantly, the cards I am holding have no bearing on how I am coming into the pot. You were asking about AA or KK in early position, but I play them the same as I would play JTo, 44, 96s or AKo. My position dictates if a hand is playable, but once I decide to play it, I'm playing it the same as any other hand from that position.
Every time I arrive at a new table, my first order of business is generally to look for the aggressive players. I want to quickly find out who likes to raise preflop, especially those that come in for a raise with limpers in front of them. Based on this, I can generally determine which positions are likely to be favorable for a raise after I come into the pot, and those positions are the ones which I will limp with any cards that I choose to play. I can then either re-raise or fold, depending on the cards that I am holding.
For example, if there are two aggresive pre-flop raisers at my table, then I will only open-limp in the positions where I am acting before them. If they have already passed, I will raise if I'm coming in, and if they limp, I will pass unless I have a hand that can stand a reraise. (Of course it's possible that they are limping with a multi-way hand, but it's far more likely that the limp is a trap.)
Any time that a major change occurs (I get moved, a new player arrives at the table, or one of the aggressive players busts-out or slows-down) I re-evaluate the table positions.
Ideally, whenever I limp strong hands based on position, the table dynamics work as planned and I get raised, but sometimes it does just get called and then checked on the BB. When this happens, I play very carefully and understand that I'm probably going to want to keep the pot small unless I flop a monster.
This style of play only works if you have the discipline to fold an overpair (even AA) against significant action when the pot was unraised preflop. I find that the times that I wind up with limpers caught between the original raiser and my reraise more than make up for it.
Good luck!
Hi There. I like to limp with AA and KK from under the gun. It feels like most times I make a raise with them, almost everyone folds. When I limp, usually at least 1 player will put in a raise pre-flop, and then I get action. This is just my opinion, and I do mix it up here and there though, where I will put in a 3xBB-4xBB raise pre-flop with AA or another monster hand under the gun. Have a good day !!!I was just wondering how everybody else plays top hands under the gun in a regular 9 person holdem table. It works beautifully for me when people cooperate and raise, but I saw how it can completely go awry yesterday when it didn't pan out for me. (K6 checked the bb and flopped a set) I usually don't do this everytime i get aces or kings first to act; it depends on if i see a short stack that could push or if somebodys on tilt, etc. Is it a good play to limp these hands, or should you just raise so there's no chance of a cheap limp-around? How does everyone else play AA, KK, etc UTG? Thanks!
I was just wondering how everybody else plays top hands under the gun in a regular 9 person holdem table. It works beautifully for me when people cooperate and raise, but I saw how it can completely go awry yesterday when it didn't pan out for me. (K6 checked the bb and flopped a set) I usually don't do this everytime i get aces or kings first to act; it depends on if i see a short stack that could push or if somebodys on tilt, etc. Is it a good play to limp these hands, or should you just raise so there's no chance of a cheap limp-around? How does everyone else play AA, KK, etc UTG? Thanks!
Basically you invited anyone with any 2 to call you pre-flop... pot odds say call even with marginal hands...
I understand that you expected villain to raise anyway, but even then people with suited connectors or pocket pairs still have a good reason to see a flop...
Why allow them to get lucky? Limping with a strong hand like that preflop is usually a great way to end up in a desaster....
And why check the flop ? There are only 3 hands that have you beaten already. Why give villain another chance to get lucky for free here?
Oh, what a good discussion))) I think limbo call is always a very very bad decision, especially with AA and QC, and then these same people write that we are afraid of such a strong pocket card. Hello, guys, just learn how to play them confidently and uncompromisingly
I checked the flop because JJ was definitely in his range after calling the 3-bet. So what is the sequence if I lead?
1. I bet out $75-$85
a. he calls or raises and I'm crushed (KK, JJ, KJs)
b. he calls and I'm still ahead (AK, QQ, KQs)
c. he folds (TT, 99, 88, 77) because of the 2 overcards
Of these 10 scenarios, only three have a favorable outcome (option b). The pot bloats to $300 and I have $165 left with no fold equity.
2. I check and keep the pot reasonable
I don't have a monster, I only have AA.