10% of your BR means that you are taking atleast 10% of your BR to the table.. which means this game is too big for you and you have no place in being there.
good advices, thanks for sharing!!!!!
you can buy in for 5% and if you double up you should be very close to 10% of your roll. at that point i don't think taking coin flips for it is a good idea.
i was trying to say if you buy in for 5% of your bankroll. if you just more than double up you now have 10% of your whole bankroll in front of you. at that point i would leave not play tighter. and buy in for what should be <5% of your bankroll at another table. IMO you shouldn't risk more than 10% of your bankroll on one hand. especially when it's a coin flip.So you advocate playing progressively tighter as your stack increases?
OK how much tighter should I play when my stack reaches 120% of my buyin? How does my play become effected once my stack reaches 150%?
Why should stack size have any bearing in an equity decision?
If the odds are correct a call is mandatory.. if the odds are not correct a fold is required.
If you wouldn't call when your stack is 200BB then then why would you call when its 100BB? The risk to reward ratio is exactly the same.
More importantly, if having a stack of 200BB causes you to make +ev folds.. then why are you still sat at the table playing? Surely you already know that your stack size is now effecting your decisions and you should have left a while ago.
Instacall
Weird, never see many knits in local cash games. My cash games people call my all-in's with k-2 suited and q-10 suited.
I gave my friend the following ridiculous cash game hypothetical:
Folds to CO, who moves All-in for 10% of your bankroll. You have him covered. He also flips over his hand, AhKs. You look down at QhQs on the button.
I told him he was about 55% to 45% to win (actually 56.1% to 43.4%). He advocated folding because it wasn't worth the variance.
I argued that the edges in poker are so small that to fold in this spot would be absolutely insane.
The blinds are in the pot. They have really, really low odds of holding big pocket pairs since you hold the QQ and your opponent holds the AK.
Is my friend a risk-averse nit? Or does his variance argument actually have some merit?
In a cash game: insta call
Tournamament:Umm it depends. Late/in the money: insta call, very early with a large field MAYBE not.
Your friend is not insane, yes i know AK is only AK high, but in that situation a QQ vs AK is almost a coinflip. If you do not want to risk 10% of your br on a flip of a coin, than you would most likely fold the QQ. If you are a good poker player, you do not risk your tournament life or money on coinflips all the time, you play hands out and try to win the cash.