Recently began playing limit games. Doing much better with respect to chip bleeding and losing buy in stacks. Anyone else have the same experience?

why forced?
you can play no limit and limit, you don't have to give up because lose streaks

Hi There

Do not forget that limit games as the name says it limit your losses
but also you gains
You can play whatever you like and waht suits you
Rgds

Originally Posted by BullXT

why forced?
you can play no limit and limit, you don't have to give up because lose streaks

I'M JUST RELATING THAT LIMIT HAS BEEN GOOD TO ME AND NO LIMIT HAS BEEN A BANE.

Originally Posted by Gorblimey

I'M JUST RELATING THAT LIMIT HAS BEEN GOOD TO ME AND NO LIMIT HAS BEEN A BANE.

why caps lock? are you crazy

play all night and the other day don't even sleep

I find limit is good if I am on a bad streak, it stops me from going all in and I step away easier. But I much before NL because I can wait out the bad streaks and capitalise when the cards are good.

Originally Posted by manzanillo53

I find limit is good if I am on a bad streak, it stops me from going all in and I step away easier. But I much before NL because I can wait out the bad streaks and capitalise when the cards are good.

I'm playing whatever I'm winning at.

PokerStars often creates incredible situations on the river. Setting a limit is a good way to minimize risk.

Originally Posted by Vallet

Setting a limit is a good way to minimize risk.

Thank you. I was trying to induce someone to admit that.

Limit is a game of pushing small edges over and over again.

So even if you of course don't lose a whole stack in a betting round the variance can be brutal, and the losing steaks can be very long.

But if it suits your personality and you like it more you should play it.

I'm more comfortable with limit games than no limit.
I was playing $3-$5 NL with a $1500 buy in max and a $500 bet max. The rake was $4/$3. Which I don't believe is beatable. Then I switched to $30-$60 limit with the same rake structure.