N
nameless1537
Rock Star
Silver Level
I'm looking over my hands, and reading over some of the responses to my recent request for hand analysis and one of the responders said something that really got me thinking.
Much of the literature that I've read seems to be more for higher stakes poker, and so the bet-sizes are usually designed to have a minimum gap between odds you give a player and the odds the player needs to win draw for a hand, but enough to make it profitable. So I've been going with half-pot bets for the most part if there is a flush draw or a straight draw.
But based on what I've been reading in these forums, that bet size is not enough at the microlimits (2NL) to exploit bad players for maximum profit... but might be adequate for higher limit tables where presumably, players are better and play the odds better. Is there truth to this in your observation? When playing 2NL tables, are many of the fish and non-regulars just so happy to see a flush draw on their suited hole cards that they will call just about anything on turn and river just to get their hand? And if so, I am guessing that each level up I go, my bet sizing probably needs to be toned down a bit more?
If that's the case, I really need to start throwing pot-sized bets or higher on wet boards if I have a decent hand to exploit this huh (if I am putting an opponent on a drawing hand)? Put in at least a pot-sized bet if I'm up against a non-regular, and maybe higher. I might occasionally get punished by a suckout, but I'd like to think that if I get someone to call on that large of a bet, I should be pretty happy in the long run right?
Much of the literature that I've read seems to be more for higher stakes poker, and so the bet-sizes are usually designed to have a minimum gap between odds you give a player and the odds the player needs to win draw for a hand, but enough to make it profitable. So I've been going with half-pot bets for the most part if there is a flush draw or a straight draw.
But based on what I've been reading in these forums, that bet size is not enough at the microlimits (2NL) to exploit bad players for maximum profit... but might be adequate for higher limit tables where presumably, players are better and play the odds better. Is there truth to this in your observation? When playing 2NL tables, are many of the fish and non-regulars just so happy to see a flush draw on their suited hole cards that they will call just about anything on turn and river just to get their hand? And if so, I am guessing that each level up I go, my bet sizing probably needs to be toned down a bit more?
If that's the case, I really need to start throwing pot-sized bets or higher on wet boards if I have a decent hand to exploit this huh (if I am putting an opponent on a drawing hand)? Put in at least a pot-sized bet if I'm up against a non-regular, and maybe higher. I might occasionally get punished by a suckout, but I'd like to think that if I get someone to call on that large of a bet, I should be pretty happy in the long run right?