$25 NLHE Full Ring: What is going on here!

ALL IN CLUBS

ALL IN CLUBS

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Total posts
1,423
Chips
0
I folded a set once... and then I woke up to discover it was a dream.

He had AcQh and you would have won because I saw it in the bottom of my cuppa this morning.

:D LOL
 
ALL IN CLUBS

ALL IN CLUBS

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Total posts
1,423
Chips
0
BTW Acky ,i'm not sure what i would do , that's why i post my HH in here also. I'm thinking he just has Ace of clubs and whatever else but on a draw he prob didn't hit yet and your like 70% to win i believe.
 
mrmonkey

mrmonkey

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Total posts
680
Chips
0
I agree with Deco here, I think this is a fold. The main reason is due to the nut flush combos he could have (AcTc+) and bigger sets that have us crushed. The only other things I see villain playing this way on turn are TP+FD, and that's only if he's aggro and thinks he has FE (which in this case I think he does). But even if we include TP+FD in his range I think we're still crushed.

Hand 0: 25.668% { 2d2h }
Hand 1: 74.332% { QQ, 99, 55, AcKc, AcQc, AcJc, AcTc, AcQd, AcQh, KcQd, KcQh }

I don't think any two pair combos are in villains pf calling range, and suited connectors that hit the flop flush are probably raising the flop.

I think the real question here is whether villain really plays QQ, 99, & 55 without raising pf (QQ) or on the flop with any of them. If we don't include bigger sets, it changes things drastically:

Hand 0: 51.989% { 2d2h }
Hand 1: 48.011% { AcKc, AcQc, AcJc, AcTc, AcQd, AcQh, KcQd, KcQh }
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
I think we are beyond almost all the time here and it sucks to have to pay off nits with retarded ranges but we have odds to call it off because his range is going to be mostly flushes and rarely sets other than QcQx. I mean, it looks SO much like QcQx I can understand wanting to fold but at least you get to laugh at how retarded his range is.
 
ALL IN CLUBS

ALL IN CLUBS

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Total posts
1,423
Chips
0
I think we are beyond almost all the time here and it sucks to have to pay off nits with retarded ranges but we have odds to call it off because his range is going to be mostly flushes and rarely sets other than QcQx. I mean, it looks SO much like QcQx I can understand wanting to fold but at least you get to laugh at how retarded his range is.

If he had QQ wouldn't he reraise Pre??
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Chips
0
Why on earth would TP+FD raise here?
Firstly I'd expect a raise from the flush draw on the flop. But say villain is a little on the passive side and opts to flat why would he raise now he holds the the same draw but now with good showdown value. He would fold out all hands he beats.

I also think the sets are far more numerous than the flush draws. Nits are not going to be flatting Axs or SCs preflop here.
 
D

DEdwardsNJ

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 13, 2009
Total posts
233
Chips
0
QxQc is possible but other than that I think a bigger set is not in his range because I gotta believe 99 or 55 raises that flop.
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Chips
0
QxQc is possible but other than that I think a bigger set is not in his range because I gotta believe 99 or 55 raises that flop.

There's someone yet to act behind on the flop + villain is a nit. (they've a tendency to slowplay more and are not as astute as a good regs)
Under normal circumstances I'd negate sets very heavily. Here I think a 50% negation, the call is even more likely if MP is a fish.
 
acky100

acky100

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Total posts
3,523
Chips
0
Meh, this hand sucks.
villain isn't a nit, he's a 14/10 reg, but i really cant see him making moves here without the best hand.

Ive looked through my database to try and see what kind of hands he's cold calling etc but all i could really see is that one time when a reg isolated a fish he cold called AKs in position.

Think its time to just give up on this one, i cant figure out what is best, if it happens again with him i will probably just call to see! We've only played 300 hands together so i dont actually know how he plays certain spots.
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
Even for FR, 14/10 is reasonably on the nitty side.

This is Stars NL 25 where regs in 6-max have a 3-bet range OTB of like 2% (vs. 20% from the blinds), FR regs are probably 3-betting even less OTB.
 
acky100

acky100

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
Total posts
3,523
Chips
0
He's just a standard TAG, i dont think 14/10 is really nitty for FR, and you'd be surprised, i think most standard regs like this guy are 3betting a bit more on the btn, this guy is 7% on the btn iirc
 
Top