G
gustav197poker
Legend
Bronze Level
In this hand I find myself in the BTN and I am handed Kh-Kc, I face the Co. This player is probably a LAG, usually proposes strong actions, when he takes the initiative. That's why I think of an induction from the preflop. I have not modified my perceived game structure, nor have I made any obvious adjustment, with respect to the form it had been taking, during this day that I commented.
Previously I had some preflop clashes with this villain, and we just quit. So I have a weak range image, against 3-bets and 4-bets in preflop, taking position.
So this sequence is designed based on preliminary statistics, which the villain has about me. And the victories that PF had.
Co makes a standard opening at 2.5 BB. We make 3-bet at X 2.7 times the increase of the villain. This amount is designed based on the previous times, that we increase your bet on PF. On these occasions, the villain made us 4-bet being V out of position. So we wanted to induce an increase. The goal was to create a trap from this place. The villain calls and we go all flop.
Flop: Qd 2c Tc Boat: $ 20. (2 players).
Villain check. I make a standard 1/3 cbet of the pot and villain called. Against this player, at first I thought about making a bigger size. But my rank blocked the AK combinations; Q-K and K-J. And possibly some small pocket, decide to leave in this place. In addition, one of the strongest combinations, which villain could have in his range, was A-Q. And probably this line, would look out of position for an increase, to block the color line that appeared on the board. Also villain could have A-T, so I thought to pronounce a standard size. Villain called and we went on the turn.
Turn: Qd 2c Tc Ah Boat: $ 49
We both checked. There wasn't much sense in betting. Any defense could shoot with Ax, 2 pairs, or even a set of ten. We remain in position with a defensive line. Villain could still keep Q-J in its range, and if I place a bet, I could turn it into a bluff, which would put me in a complicated situation, considering that we are now OPP.
River: Qd 2c Tc Ah 8c Boat: $ 49
Villain comes forward and makes a bet of 40% pot size. We are not happy to block the flush now, because this bet almost always means strength of value. In fact, the chosen size is misleading and many times the villain with this bet is inciting an induction. So now, v probably bet on Ax or double pairs at least. It is a difficult situation, but we decided to turn our hand into a semi bluff receiver. We can be wrong but we have an reasonable price, considering the whole hand.
I would like to know your opinion about this hand in general. Any comments or advice will be welcome for me.
Here the hand link:
https://www.cardschat.com/replayer/1qdPqk5
Regards.
Previously I had some preflop clashes with this villain, and we just quit. So I have a weak range image, against 3-bets and 4-bets in preflop, taking position.
So this sequence is designed based on preliminary statistics, which the villain has about me. And the victories that PF had.
Co makes a standard opening at 2.5 BB. We make 3-bet at X 2.7 times the increase of the villain. This amount is designed based on the previous times, that we increase your bet on PF. On these occasions, the villain made us 4-bet being V out of position. So we wanted to induce an increase. The goal was to create a trap from this place. The villain calls and we go all flop.
Flop: Qd 2c Tc Boat: $ 20. (2 players).
Villain check. I make a standard 1/3 cbet of the pot and villain called. Against this player, at first I thought about making a bigger size. But my rank blocked the AK combinations; Q-K and K-J. And possibly some small pocket, decide to leave in this place. In addition, one of the strongest combinations, which villain could have in his range, was A-Q. And probably this line, would look out of position for an increase, to block the color line that appeared on the board. Also villain could have A-T, so I thought to pronounce a standard size. Villain called and we went on the turn.
Turn: Qd 2c Tc Ah Boat: $ 49
We both checked. There wasn't much sense in betting. Any defense could shoot with Ax, 2 pairs, or even a set of ten. We remain in position with a defensive line. Villain could still keep Q-J in its range, and if I place a bet, I could turn it into a bluff, which would put me in a complicated situation, considering that we are now OPP.
River: Qd 2c Tc Ah 8c Boat: $ 49
Villain comes forward and makes a bet of 40% pot size. We are not happy to block the flush now, because this bet almost always means strength of value. In fact, the chosen size is misleading and many times the villain with this bet is inciting an induction. So now, v probably bet on Ax or double pairs at least. It is a difficult situation, but we decided to turn our hand into a semi bluff receiver. We can be wrong but we have an reasonable price, considering the whole hand.
I would like to know your opinion about this hand in general. Any comments or advice will be welcome for me.
Here the hand link:
https://www.cardschat.com/replayer/1qdPqk5
Regards.