B
braun_kan
Enthusiast
Silver Level
Winning Poker, Hold'em No Limit - $0.01/$0.02 - 5 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat
UTG: $3.08 (154 bb)
CO: $2.00 (100 bb)
BU: $2.00 (100 bb)
SB (Hero): $2.33 (117 bb)
BB: $0.69 (35 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.03) Hero is SB with K♦ K♣
UTG raises to $0.06, 2 players fold, Hero 3-bets to $0.24, 1 fold, UTG calls $0.18
Flop: ($0.50) 8♣ 9♥ 9♣ (2 players)
Hero bets $0.37, UTG calls $0.37
Turn: ($1.24) 7♠ (2 players)
Hero bets $0.93, UTG raises to $1.86, Hero calls $0.79 (all-in)
Villains Hand: JsTc
Villain Stats: 31/20/1 Fold to 3-bet: 50, Fold to C-bet: 33 (165 hands)
Villain is very LAG pre-flop but passive and sticky post-flop. I know villain hates folding pre since I had a previous hand with them where they called a 4-bet with QTo and then stacked off with a gut shot.
On the flop I am raising for value against his draws and pocket pairs. Should I have made my raise size even bigger since I know this villain is incredibly sticky even with low equity? The turn connects the board and completes JT and 76 which for this villain I think all 32 combos of these hands are in his range. But I should still be betting big for value here since I know he is continuing with tons of draws and pocket pairs still, right? Would there be any argument for pot control here? Now when he jams on me my odds are too good to fold, but his AF of 1.07 basically tells me he has the nuts. I dont think he has TT,JJ or QQ since he would be going all in pre with those. Would folding the turn be too fancy? Sucks to call off 40bb when I basically know I am beat.
Replay this hand on CardsChat
UTG: $3.08 (154 bb)
CO: $2.00 (100 bb)
BU: $2.00 (100 bb)
SB (Hero): $2.33 (117 bb)
BB: $0.69 (35 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.03) Hero is SB with K♦ K♣
UTG raises to $0.06, 2 players fold, Hero 3-bets to $0.24, 1 fold, UTG calls $0.18
Flop: ($0.50) 8♣ 9♥ 9♣ (2 players)
Hero bets $0.37, UTG calls $0.37
Turn: ($1.24) 7♠ (2 players)
Hero bets $0.93, UTG raises to $1.86, Hero calls $0.79 (all-in)
Villains Hand: JsTc
Villain Stats: 31/20/1 Fold to 3-bet: 50, Fold to C-bet: 33 (165 hands)
Villain is very LAG pre-flop but passive and sticky post-flop. I know villain hates folding pre since I had a previous hand with them where they called a 4-bet with QTo and then stacked off with a gut shot.
On the flop I am raising for value against his draws and pocket pairs. Should I have made my raise size even bigger since I know this villain is incredibly sticky even with low equity? The turn connects the board and completes JT and 76 which for this villain I think all 32 combos of these hands are in his range. But I should still be betting big for value here since I know he is continuing with tons of draws and pocket pairs still, right? Would there be any argument for pot control here? Now when he jams on me my odds are too good to fold, but his AF of 1.07 basically tells me he has the nuts. I dont think he has TT,JJ or QQ since he would be going all in pre with those. Would folding the turn be too fancy? Sucks to call off 40bb when I basically know I am beat.