C
Casey55
Rock Star
Silver Level
pokerstars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.01/$0.02 - 5 players
Hand delivered by Upswing Poker
UTG: $1.93 (97 bb)
CO (Hero): $2.53 (127 bb)
BU: $5.67 (284 bb)
SB: $1.93 (97 bb)
BB: $2.34 (117 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with A♥ Q♣
1 fold, Hero raises to $0.06, BTN 3-bets to $0.18, 2 players fold, Hero calls $0.12
Flop: ($0.39) K♦ 2♦ T♣ (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.20, CO (Hero) folds
Villain's stats: VPIP 23/PFR 20/ AF 5 (58 hands)
does 5 AF mean they are very aggressive?
I am wondering if I should 4-bet here, I watched some material that made sense to me and I can't fully remember it I am going to go back and re-watch but it was basically implying sometimes its better not to 3 or 4-bet if you think the range that will call you will put your equity in a tough spot say you 3-bet a player with AK and they call with all their over-pairs and AK ... then your hands equity is actually not loving it ..but if you just call then your ahead in equity.. idk if that makes any sense but I have been trying to think about this concept during hands like this one. If I 4-bet here OOP what am I accomplishing? Villain will likely continue with good hands and fold the weaker parts of his range.. feels like of like a lose-lose..we would be OOP versus a strong 4-bet calling range, what are your thoughts on this? I am wondering against a player of these stats though if we can 4-bet for value.. if he is 3-betting 15% of hands and has an AF of 5 seems quite active.
Hand delivered by Upswing Poker
UTG: $1.93 (97 bb)
CO (Hero): $2.53 (127 bb)
BU: $5.67 (284 bb)
SB: $1.93 (97 bb)
BB: $2.34 (117 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with A♥ Q♣
1 fold, Hero raises to $0.06, BTN 3-bets to $0.18, 2 players fold, Hero calls $0.12
Flop: ($0.39) K♦ 2♦ T♣ (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $0.20, CO (Hero) folds
Villain's stats: VPIP 23/PFR 20/ AF 5 (58 hands)
does 5 AF mean they are very aggressive?
I am wondering if I should 4-bet here, I watched some material that made sense to me and I can't fully remember it I am going to go back and re-watch but it was basically implying sometimes its better not to 3 or 4-bet if you think the range that will call you will put your equity in a tough spot say you 3-bet a player with AK and they call with all their over-pairs and AK ... then your hands equity is actually not loving it ..but if you just call then your ahead in equity.. idk if that makes any sense but I have been trying to think about this concept during hands like this one. If I 4-bet here OOP what am I accomplishing? Villain will likely continue with good hands and fold the weaker parts of his range.. feels like of like a lose-lose..we would be OOP versus a strong 4-bet calling range, what are your thoughts on this? I am wondering against a player of these stats though if we can 4-bet for value.. if he is 3-betting 15% of hands and has an AF of 5 seems quite active.