I do know one thing for certain, these things like a lot of others in the social media. Should not be guilty until you can prove you are innocent.
That is true in principle, and ideally it would have been good, if the people, who got suspicious about this, had taken the time to collect some of the evidence and do some number crunching, before they went public, so they could say "this is our edidence". Like his winrate, his river stats, his showdown stats, damming footage etc.
However its also important to remember, that all this evidence has only been collected due to the combined effort of people looking into this, who would not have done so, had the accusations not been made public.
Finally there is a history for this kind of cheating not actually being punished by the actual law. The online superusers for instance were never procecuted and convicted, they were just removed from their jobs.
So this self regulation by the poker community might be all, there even is to it. And its hardly particularly unfair, that someone, who has almost certainly cheated, like we are now 99,99% sure, has to afterwards find another profession than playing poker.