Amaya. Good for the game - or bad?

NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
As you guys may be aware, I stepped away from poker for quite a while after Full Tilt hit one or two challenges with their leadership style, although I did eventually manage to retrieve my funds from them. At that point in time pokerstars were far and away the best poker site, not just in their amount of traffic but in terms of a total commitment to quality customer service and trying to give everybody as pleasant a playing experience with them as possible.

I wasn't keeping up with poker news during the time that I was away, but I think it might be fair to say that PokerStars aren't quite as adored by the poker community now as they were at the time that I left. In fact, some members here seem to unleash personal attacks on any other members who don't loathe PokerStars the same way that they do. They have reduced the number of website affiliates, they have increased rake, in fact they have done many of the things that you would expect a company owned by shareholders to do in an effort to maximise returns on the money that those shareholders have invested in them.

Quite frankly, I'm not particularly bothered what poker pros or players that make a living from grinding think about the changes, they have little relevance to my life as I'm a casual player and I can see why they have an axe to grind about these changes. They're quite clearly biased. As Daniel Negreanu said: "Winning players are killing poker". I assume that he was referring to online poker, because seeing "ordinary" people winning enormous sums of money obviously attracts a lot of new players to the game.

I read somewhere, can't remember where, that because Amaya is a publicly quoted company, with shareholders, this means that they are more likely to be able to swing a deal for online poker to return to the USA. Most people here would probably see that as a good thing? I certainly would.

PokersStars did a trememendous job in helping to build up the worldwide interest in, and following for, poker. A lot of their big tournaments still go out on TV all around the world. Now poker is well established, they have a dominant position in the online poker industry and their shareholders want them to cash in on that. They're not there to mollycoddle multi-tablers and poker pros, they're there to earn a good return for their investors.

Obviously they are going to lose players, so we might see other poker sites gaining more prominence, especially now that they seem less customer-service-orientated. Full Tilt is also now part of the Amaya stable, but there are plenty of other poker sites available. Check out this page if you would like to find some more sites to sign up with, and help to support CardsChat by doing so:

https://www.cardschat.com/poker-site-reviews.php

So guys, what do you think - is Amaya good for the game of poker or is it damaging it?
 
O

onemorechance

live free or die
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Total posts
2,925
Chips
0
I'm in a similar position to you, coming back to the game after some time away.

It's probably been a good six or seven months since I closely followed what was happening in the 'poker world', and in that time the general of view of Stars both here and on 2p2 has gone from almost universally positive to pretty sceptical at the very least in the direction it's going. I'm not saying I blindly follow mob mentality, but it strikes me as significant change in general attitude and is why I've started back elsewhere, when previously I don't think I'd have considered playing anywhere but Stars
 
NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
I don't play at PS myself, but it's for a far more basic reason and one which I think was already in force long before Amaya became involved. We have three recreational poker players in this house, I have a high-spec PC and work funny shifts, the other members of the family have a laptop and a netbook respectively, so when I am at work they like to play poker on a good PC with a hard-wired internet connection instead of wifi.

PS seem to put spyware on your PC (which I assume that many sites will), then when you go to play with a second account on the same PC they stop that second account from accessing a whole range of benefits, such as when I tried to use their poker school. I'm sure they think that they are very clever but I don't like the feeling that I'm being spied on. At that point I decided to do without them in my life, especially as their astronomy-orientated freerolls are such a waste of time.
 
mendiolacubicle

mendiolacubicle

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Total posts
133
Chips
0
Overall in my opinion it's a global expansion which means more players coming in from places of "opportunity".

I'm still very much positive with how events will turn out for PokerStars under Amaya, hopefully our US brothers an. sisters would be able to play in PS really soon.
 
Syltan

Syltan

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Total posts
2,810
Awards
8
Chips
35
I think it was followed by many changes, the main increase rake in the cache and tournaments, and selling only a farce that would pay less taxes!!
 
I

IvanShovski

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Total posts
590
Awards
1
Chips
0
PS seem to put spyware on your PC (which I assume that many sites will), then when you go to play with a second account on the same PC they stop that second account from accessing a whole range of benefits, such as when I tried to use their poker school. I'm sure they think that they are very clever but I don't like the feeling that I'm being spied on. At that point I decided to do without them in my life, especially as their astronomy-orientated freerolls are such a waste of time.
PokerStars doesn't need to use spyware to determine that multiple accounts are using the same device or IP address to connect to their servers. They use this information to protect all players from the threat posed by multi-accounters, and I don't think that you should be too concerned about it.

A change of ownership seemed to be essential if PokerStars were ever to be allowed back into the U.S. market. For this reason, the purchase by Amaya would seem to be good for poker.
 
veltins

veltins

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Total posts
2,756
Awards
2
JP
Chips
66
i guess it s good for amaya , not really for poker . Amaya has aquired PS and ft to make much more Money . they dont care about Players n giving back too much.
 
theRaven68

theRaven68

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Nov 16, 2013
Total posts
2,336
Awards
2
Chips
1
good or bad, it depends.
grinders are affected with changes and casual players are not, and dont forget about potential of old/new market in the USA...and they will not play only poker
 
rogerdelpk

rogerdelpk

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 23, 2014
Total posts
218
Chips
0
Amaya cares only about profit, not about poker........
 
NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
Roger that, as with any other BUSINESS!!! The bottom line is Profit.

To a certain extent that is true, but the previous owners of Pokerstars appeared to be totally focussed on giving players a great experience and their customer service was superb, which in turn helped the rapid expansion of online poker. Obviously they made profits along the way.
 
curtinsea

curtinsea

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Total posts
495
Awards
1
Chips
2
To a certain extent that is true, but the previous owners of Pokerstars appeared to be totally focussed on giving players a great experience and their customer service was superb, which in turn helped the rapid expansion of online poker. Obviously they made profits along the way.

Previously, Pokerstars was privately held. This made the owners quite rich(er). Amaya, on the other hand, is a publicly held corporation, who has many, many, many owners it must answer to, and needs to be far more profitable. It also has a lot of debt to service now as well.

Calculated decisions are being made to increase the margins.
 
NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
I think that a lot of players in the USA would be delighted to see Pokerstars return, regardless of the controversy that they seem to be causing.
 
A2345Razz

A2345Razz

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 4, 2012
Total posts
1,190
Chips
0
Clearly the answer is getting worse and worse for the game.

Whether they are better or worse than other operators is really besides the point; Amayastars has clearly turned the corner and is looking for short term margin building over long term health for the game.


If they change course and start reinvesting a bunch of money to initiate new programs to support micro ring games or attract new players, etc, I will be the first to talk about it.
 
TeUnit

TeUnit

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Total posts
4,734
Awards
14
Chips
77
I think its good and bad for the game, as they continue to increase rake it should help traffic at the smaller sites, and hopefully these guys have their eye on the prize and push for a federal solution
 
D

da_goat

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2014
Total posts
81
Chips
0
If they will somehow see that you need to throw us players a bone and not get too greedy, it would be good for all parties.
 
DonV73

DonV73

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
May 12, 2012
Total posts
672
Chips
0
My opinion is that it is not good for the game, based on first changes they made since buying ps. But maybe it is too quick of a conclusion.
 
arizoney

arizoney

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Total posts
386
Awards
1
Chips
1
https://www.cardschat.com/news/amaya-gaming-canada-raided-8788 this might not be a big deal but is this enough to keep them out of the real money markets for poker in the US at least i think it makes them a bad actor now. so if it does we can write them off but im no legal analyst but i wonder what is now in store for these people lol. just goes to show if it isnt one thing its another
 
Last edited:
S

sashwerter

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Total posts
26
Chips
0
If they reduce the payment for the status Sn or SNE and the money sent for promotions and bonuses for other players, it was excellent
 
Mark Gavr

Mark Gavr

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Total posts
94
Chips
0
It seems to me that Amaya is not thinking about the game of poker, it is more concerned about their profits ....
 
Y

YouPay4MyCrack

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Total posts
81
Chips
0
As you guys may be aware, I stepped away from poker for quite a while after Full Tilt hit one or two challenges with their leadership style, although I did eventually manage to retrieve my funds from them. At that point in time PokerStars were far and away the best poker site, not just in their amount of traffic but in terms of a total commitment to quality customer service and trying to give everybody as pleasant a playing experience with them as possible.

I wasn't keeping up with poker news during the time that I was away, but I think it might be fair to say that PokerStars aren't quite as adored by the poker community now as they were at the time that I left. In fact, some members here seem to unleash personal attacks on any other members who don't loathe PokerStars the same way that they do. They have reduced the number of website affiliates, they have increased rake, in fact they have done many of the things that you would expect a company owned by shareholders to do in an effort to maximise returns on the money that those shareholders have invested in them.

Quite frankly, I'm not particularly bothered what poker pros or players that make a living from grinding think about the changes, they have little relevance to my life as I'm a casual player and I can see why they have an axe to grind about these changes. They're quite clearly biased. As Daniel Negreanu said: "Winning players are killing poker". I assume that he was referring to online poker, because seeing "ordinary" people winning enormous sums of money obviously attracts a lot of new players to the game.

I read somewhere, can't remember where, that because Amaya is a publicly quoted company, with shareholders, this means that they are more likely to be able to swing a deal for online poker to return to the USA. Most people here would probably see that as a good thing? I certainly would.

PokersStars did a trememendous job in helping to build up the worldwide interest in, and following for, poker. A lot of their big tournaments still go out on TV all around the world. Now poker is well established, they have a dominant position in the online poker industry and their shareholders want them to cash in on that. They're not there to mollycoddle multi-tablers and poker pros, they're there to earn a good return for their investors.

Obviously they are going to lose players, so we might see other poker sites gaining more prominence, especially now that they seem less customer-service-orientated. Full Tilt is also now part of the Amaya stable, but there are plenty of other poker sites available. Check out this page if you would like to find some more sites to sign up with, and help to support CardsChat by doing so:

https://www.cardschat.com/poker-site-reviews.php

So guys, what do you think - is Amaya good for the game of poker or is it damaging it?

I'm in all of those sites except Sportsbetting and Sportsboook, but play most on BetOnline and Full Flush. I miss the days of Hero Poker and missed out on the days of PokerStars in the USA.
 
hulinada

hulinada

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Total posts
283
Awards
2
Chips
0
When they raised the rake, they knew that we would not like it. We still have nowhere else to play, so it makes no sense to pretend that we are somewhere leave.
 
ccocco

ccocco

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Total posts
460
Chips
0
Today day 10 years ago there was so many online poker rooms, knows that PS so I always have promotions and joins Internet sites to promote tournaments, would be good for poker as Daniel Negreanu, who has not said much money for a winner. you have more winners to hand over well among many players positions. and so attract people.
 
horizon12

horizon12

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Total posts
4,126
Chips
0
For US players well, now has a chance to enter the US market and to legalize poker in many states..
 
Top 10 Games
Top