Take all your rebuys at the beginning?

Jacki Burkhart

Jacki Burkhart

long winded rambler...
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
2,960
Awards
6
Chips
0
I play in a lot of live guarantee tourneys where in order to make their guarantee they let you have your 1 or 2 rebuys anytime.

I notice a few players just automatically buy a double or a triple stack from the get go.

I almost never do, I'd prefer to try to win it and then I can always buy it later.

My thought process basically goes like this "I'm probably one of the better players at the table, it shouldn't be too hard for me to run it up so if I can acquire a $200 stack for the cost of only $100 I've essentially just "cashed" in this tournament for $100....via the logic of a penny saved is a penny earned.

If variance strikes, or I endure a massive cooler I'll lose fewer chips and still have an opportunity to start over fresh. Also, I'll have armed my opponent with fewer chips to use against my new fresh stack (to the victor goes the spoils of war....)

I know there must be other schools of thought out there, I'd like to hear them! What do you do? What do you recommend and why?
 
suby_rafael

suby_rafael

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 24, 2014
Total posts
1,039
Chips
0
I think not rebuying right away can be a profitable strategy.

Without rebuying if you make it into the money then you get a nice pay day with limited investment. With this strategy i think you should look to play tight in the early stages as there are going to be wild players in the rebuy period who are going to gamble more.

We can play tight and hope to hook one of them fishes and then steadily look to build the stack until the rebuy period is over. Then we can addon if required and now players are not going to gamble as much as they were before.

Then i would still try to make the money and so not start playing loose. After making the money we can play a lot looser until we bust out or make a decent stack again after some run good and then play solid again and look to go super deep into the tournament.
 
R

RamdeeBen

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Total posts
7,745
Chips
0
It's massively -EV to not buy to the maximum assuming you feel you have an edge vs most of the players. It's even more so if the fish double/triple rebuy and you don't. If your thought process really is you feel you're one of the better players at the table and everyone else is rebuying then the logic doesn't make sense.

Sure you might run it up, but look at how much you're passing up on.

Say it's 6 handed and 5 of the players all have 3000x starting stack and all triple rebuy to 9000x stack and you're better than them all yet you decide to just not rebuy. Instead of potentially winning 9000x in a hand, you have to win 2 stacks worth from other stacks during the rebuy period to just get to even vs the bad players.

It's like the same logic with the cash games, if you're the best player at the table you NEED to have at the least everyone covered at the table or you're just passing up way to much on EV. Coolers or variance shouldn't effect your decision to rebuy either by the way.

The only time I'd advocate not rebuying is if either, you don't have an edge (which you shouldn't really be playing the game anyway) OR if you're shot taking and it's just terrible BR management to rebuy etc. Problem with these situations though is you shouldn't even be in the game to start with unless your'e some how free rolling the event by winning a ticket from somewhere or someone just decided to buy you in then you can just try run it up and try play it like a freeze out. Oh and also maybe one other circumstance where not rebuying is an option. Say you feel you have an edge in the actual tournament yet somehow manage to draw the worse table and are -EV vs everyone then not rebuying to the maximum seems correct until a table change.
 
Last edited:
youregoodmate

youregoodmate

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Total posts
2,683
Chips
0
Ditto PokerBen. Not buying for max is -EV.
 
Farseer

Farseer

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Total posts
388
Awards
1
Chips
3
I usually play rebuys that award larger add-on with same price than rebuys. Then it is usually very +EV either to late reg right into add-on (possible in many sites). This is especially true in 3x turbos (which still have 90 min latereg in Stars.fr) which give 10x add-ons, but also notable in regular/satellite rebuys which give 2x add-on.

In general regular rebuys last too long to be as profitable to play than other tournaments time/moneywise. Upside is that many players are there just playing maniac and throwing their chips away and rebuying after rebuying.

In live tournaments with shallow stacks I usually prefer to play with small stack for half price than 2x small stack for full price, especially with antes. And they also usually have much larger add-on than rebuy. If they're deepstacked with add-on chips being the same than rebuy and/or your table is full of fishes, then take rebuy in the beginning for sure.
 
H

hffjd2000

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Total posts
2,329
Chips
0
From the get go, I want to be the highest stack.

That would be a tremendous advantage in my part since at the beginning, Im already so deep.

Same with cash games live, you want to cover them all.
 
sunirico

sunirico

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Total posts
966
Awards
12
Chips
0
The first time I played a rebuy tourney it dawned on me that you might just as well consider minimum bet to be equal to 1 times starting stack (1xSS) since every hand someone would shove. I decided to do an experiment on a play money rebuy tournament.

From the first hand I shoved and it costed me 3 buy-ins before I hit and was 3xSS strong. You could probably be more selective at this stage but I wanted to get in as early as possible. From here I didn't play every hand but played very loose, range with any Jack and above high card, using an opening bet of 1xSS.

This forces short stack opponents to go all in pre-flop and puts pressure on the few who have doubled up to commit to a large pot. Playing short handed for much larger side pots levels out the odds of your looser range and pays in itself for what u lose to a stronger hand winning the main pot.

When add-on period came I was chip lead 125xSS strong and could probably have sat out until final table but what is the fun in that. :D Least it to say I didn't buy the add-on but I agree with Ben, if I was shorter stacked I would add the extra chips to increase my score doubling up into larger stacks ahead.

Conclusion: Playing rebuy tourneys as tight or even tighter than 1 buy-in tournaments makes no sense to me. I believe we have to recognize the opportunities and exploit them to our advantage.
 
Jacki Burkhart

Jacki Burkhart

long winded rambler...
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
2,960
Awards
6
Chips
0
Well it's not like everybody buys a double or triple stack and I don't. Maybe 1-2 players at each table buy the additional chips and everyone else waits.
 
Jacki Burkhart

Jacki Burkhart

long winded rambler...
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
2,960
Awards
6
Chips
0
Also these are not $1 or $2 online tourneys. Usually $100 gets you 100bbs. And so paying $200 gets you 200bbs. So we're not "buying short" by buying a standard stack...
 
Slawa1986

Slawa1986

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Total posts
97
Chips
0
I do rebuy from the beginning of the tournament! This gives the advantage at the start of the tournament! You can put pressure on the opponent Bank!
 
Jacki Burkhart

Jacki Burkhart

long winded rambler...
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
2,960
Awards
6
Chips
0
Ditto PokerBen. Not buying for max is -EV.

Ok, but why? I hear this a lot and for cash I understand it and accept it to be true...but I guess I'm just not ready to assume it's also true for tourneys just because it's true for cash...I want to delve into the topic and understand WHY before I invest in that as my new strategy.

Now, it may turn out to be true but I think it's healthy and wise to question assumptions.

For instance until 2007/2008 it was generally assumed to be true that tight aggressive was the way to play tournaments. Until some creative fresh minds starting questioning the old assumptions and landed on a new profitable strategy (LAG play). And started crushing tourneys and really revolutionized the game.

I'm not saying this is the same thing; but I suspect the dilemma of how big a tourney stack to buy is at the very least a more complex discussion than "always buy the max"

One possible consideration is your table draw. In a cash game you have complete control over where you sit, when you sit, if you sit, when you leave etc. in a tourney you do not; you sit where they put you and you move when they say so.

So for instance if I had a loose passive calling station on my left I'd want a big stack to fully extract. If I had a talented LAG on my left I might hold off because having position between 2 big stacks plays right into the LAG's style. Since he likes to take away lots of pots on the turn and river; and needs to have huge implied odds for when his weird hands bink hard and you decide to make a stand with TP or better...if effective stacks are smaller he can't have huge implied odds against me and I won't be facing as many tough river decisions...
 
Last edited:
intents09

intents09

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Total posts
3,188
Chips
0
I see both sides here. I'm going to attempt to keep it simpler and avoid the deeper thinking side of this. For me, it's fairly simple. If the tourney is micro and I know there are going to be 2x rebuys for every entry or more, I'm rebuying straight away and possibly more later if I go broke still in rebuy period. Until I've spent what I'm comfortable spending, which is typically just under or at a min cash worth at the absolute most, but usually do fine getting to addon on the rebuy from the start, or one double rebuy later on.

In the example you bring of 100$ for 100bb and 200$ for 200bb, I would see that it really doesn't matter here which way you go, and especially if there aren't loads of rebuys. Say 60 entries, what do 5 people rebuying at the start really have an advantage over?

I guess subconsciously I consider total chips in play, or an estimation of, and decide whether or not I feel a rebuy right away has any advantage over waiting or not having to at all. With less rebuying straight away, I'm less inclined to.

This is also not something I stick to, probably because there's no strict reason for me to rebuy or not straight away, as occasionally when less rebuy at the start and I am confident in my game but have some better players at my table, I may rebuy in this case but this is random and again, dependent on mood, table, etc.
 
Debi

Debi

Forum Admin
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Total posts
74,638
Awards
20
Chips
1,331
I am totally with Ben on this - I would never pass up the opportunity to have more chips. If only 1 or 2 people are doing it per table I would always want to be one of those 1 or 2 and have most of the table covered.

For the same reasons already stated - mostly by Ben. :)
 
duggs

duggs

Killing me softly
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Total posts
9,512
Awards
2
Chips
0
100% agree with Ben.
 
H

HooDooKoo

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Total posts
985
Chips
0
I agree 100% with PokerBen and youregoodmate and Debi and duggs and hffjd2000 and Slawa1986. Methinks we have a quorum.

I will agree to be open-minded IF you can sufficiently answer the following question: if you KNOW that buying-in for the table maximum maximizes EV at a cash table --- which is absolutely true --- then why wouldn't the same be true in a tournament setting? The same reasons that it's max EV in a cash game apply in a tournament setting.

-HooDooKoo
 
Last edited:
duggs

duggs

Killing me softly
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Total posts
9,512
Awards
2
Chips
0
Some quick thoughts but I'll come back later

Deeper stack bigger edge,

Deeper stack longer before you are short, edge is more persistent,

Bigger stack bigger Roi

Ou have already pointed out you are best at the table, so why not?
 
C

Caissa

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Total posts
56
Chips
0
I agree 100% with PokerBen and youregoodmate and Debi and duggs and hffjd2000 and Slawa1986. Methinks we have a quorum.

I will agree to be open-minded IF you can sufficiently answer the following question: if you KNOW that buying-in for the table maximum maximizes EV at a cash table --- which is absolutely true --- then why wouldn't the same be true in a tournament setting? The same reasons that it's max EV in a cash game apply in a tournament setting.

-HooDooKoo

It's not the same as a cash game. ICM. a 50/50 all-in shot on a 30BB give you an EV of 30BB. a 50/50 all in shot in a tournament gives you an EV of 30BB also, but that is cEV not $EV which we all know is different.

In a cash game EV for each pot is independent. A tournament is one big "pot" in its entirety. So in a tournament a 100% increase in chips does not equal a 100% increase in $EV. If fact, the earlier in the tournament it is the more this is true that's why we try to exercise pot control in early stages.
 
Jacki Burkhart

Jacki Burkhart

long winded rambler...
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
2,960
Awards
6
Chips
0
I guess my thinking on this topic is hard to describe (maybe because it's illogical....?)

So if I have an edge doubling my stack doesn't double my edge. It less than doubles my edge, but it does double my risk.

So, if I can buy a standard stack and very reliably run it up to average with little risk (because remember a minority is buying double stacks) then I feel I have above average skills with an average stack and a below average investment.

The tournament value in dollars of "doubling up" early is not nearly as valuable in terms of payouts as being average stacked later.

So if you can double up "for free" early on then woohoo...but if you have to buy your double up I doubt if it doubles your average payout...

It's not a cash game where I can just top up after each hand if I catch a cooler; and it's not an unlimited rebuy where I can keep trying and trying to build a big stack; so it seems being mindful of variance and saving a bullet for only if I need it maybe wise...

Does any of this make sense to anybody else? I realize I may be wrong. But my gut tells me there's more to this and I don't want to just concede the point based on peer pressure. I'm not trying to argue out of stubbornness either...genuinely trying to understand the equity of buying chips in a tourney...
 
Jacki Burkhart

Jacki Burkhart

long winded rambler...
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Total posts
2,960
Awards
6
Chips
0
In these tourneys typically there will be 90-120 players and about 40-60 rebuys by the end of the rebuy period... But maybe only 15-20 players actually buy a double stack from the start. The rest rebuy when they bust or get really short.
 
duggs

duggs

Killing me softly
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Total posts
9,512
Awards
2
Chips
0
well the situation you described is kinda moot,
A)you rebuy instantly, and lose half your stack because you cover when you get coloured

B) you get coloured and rebuy, stack is the same as above.

the value comes in being deeper. your edge is amplified in terms of chips. i would think the payoff takes care of itself. consider it a 300 tourney which people are allowed to buy in short. would you actively buy in short?
 
H

HooDooKoo

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Total posts
985
Chips
0
It's not the same as a cash game. ICM. a 50/50 all-in shot on a 30BB give you an EV of 30BB. a 50/50 all in shot in a tournament gives you an EV of 30BB also, but that is cEV not $EV which we all know is different.

In a cash game EV for each pot is independent. A tournament is one big "pot" in its entirety. So in a tournament a 100% increase in chips does not equal a 100% increase in $EV. If fact, the earlier in the tournament it is the more this is true that's why we try to exercise pot control in early stages.

I'm well aware of ICM and how ICM theory creates differences in optimal tournament play versus optimal cash game play. Irrespective of those (generally minor) differences, the same principles apply to big stack situations in both tournaments and cash games:

1. The bigger stack allows you to put more "pressure" on your opponents, especially if you open card dead (because most of us are much more willing to steal and/or re-steal when we have a big stack);
2. Every extra chip in your stack increases the number of chips you can win in a given hand --- a huge edge if you're a good player; and
3. You can make an early mistake or suffer an early bad beat and survive --- potentially still with a bigger than average stack. This fact makes most players more willing to be aggressive, which is generally good for their game.

-HooDooKoo
 
Last edited:
H

HooDooKoo

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Total posts
985
Chips
0
the value comes in being deeper. your edge is amplified in terms of chips. i would think the payoff takes care of itself. consider it a 300 tourney which people are allowed to buy in short. would you actively buy in short?

What duggs said! This is no different than cash game players buying-in for the table min, which is -EV unless you are a bad player.

missjacki believes she's, generally, one of the stronger players at her tables, so I'll take her word on that. In that situation --- as one of the best players at given table --- having a big stack is a big advantage.

-HooDooKoo
 
Everybodylovesdeuces

Everybodylovesdeuces

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Total posts
148
Chips
0
It would be worth mentioning (I play these same games with MJ) that even if we double and get a big stack early we are almost always taking the rebuy at the end of the rebuy period. So the real question is do you take it right away or at the end of the rebuy period? I usually lean to waiting until the end of the rebuy period unless something goes wrong early and I loose a bunch of chips (I'll usually wait until I loose over half a starting stack).

Also I'll mention MJ is always one of the top two players at any table in these tournaments.
 
Top