from a mathematical point of view, they are not so profitable, but I myself often play in this format in the hope of breaking the jackpot
Why is it from the mathematical side not so profitable? Variance? This is a thing, which I'm long thinking about ... U have the same variance in mtts. Have to deal with downswing more than with rungoods. So, in my opinion . Just because, even if you finish in the money, it is almost a feeling like lose ,cuz mincashing for 6-8 hours of work are a lost.
However, I think it is the most profitable way in poker. It's fast. That's important to get results for staying motivated and focused. It's calculable on sites like stars, cuz mostly there playing the same dudes the same games.
There is only ONE POINT .
Find me a site with rakeback and a good traffic for SNG players.
Stars are the only one which offering a wide variety of different types of games. On demand sng format .180 turbo. 45 entrants. Etc....
But the point is: No rakeback!
partypoker or ACR ...?
There is no traffic ...
Do you know a site?