Again, your risk is relative to your BR. So, if you can't fold QQ in a .10 game because it's <1% of your BR, then you should be able say the same for a 1k buy-in game if you're risk is also <1% of your BR in the exact same situation.
Yes, I agree, for most players, calling an all-in with QQ in a .10 is a no brainer because the risk is usually minuscule, but it's all relative to that players BR. Calling an all-in in a $100 buy-in (more common than 1k buy-in) might be a harder decision if it's a significant amount of money, so you might not want to take that risk and wait for a better spot. However, a player with a $500K BR might say, 'It's only a $100. Easy call with QQ." You might disagree because your BR is only $5K, but it's still all relative.
We should be teaching others how to make +EV decisions based on information given and not what the buy-in is. What if OP just has loads of cash, deposited $10K and hopped into a $200 buy-in MTT and came into this situation. How would the replies differ and would the buy-in be a major factor?