mbrenneman0
Legend
Silver Level
In Arnold Snyder's "the poker tournament forumula" He advocates a rock paper scissors strategy, where rock is chips, paper is cards, and scissors is position. according to Snyder's advice, chips beat position, position beats cards and cards beat chips.
Is this advice still relevant? or would a averaging approach be relevent, where chips + position + cards /3 = play the hand or not (i hope that makes sense the way i said that)
Currently I play in a way where i wont make a position play if I have terrible cards even if the conditions are prime to make that position play. is that just me being afraid to trust the position strategy or is it a smart conservative play.
I will admit, i need to read Snyder's book again, its been a long time since i've read it. also I have not read Harrington, but I've heard that Snyder's book is considered on par with Harrington.
Is this advice still relevant? or would a averaging approach be relevent, where chips + position + cards /3 = play the hand or not (i hope that makes sense the way i said that)
Currently I play in a way where i wont make a position play if I have terrible cards even if the conditions are prime to make that position play. is that just me being afraid to trust the position strategy or is it a smart conservative play.
I will admit, i need to read Snyder's book again, its been a long time since i've read it. also I have not read Harrington, but I've heard that Snyder's book is considered on par with Harrington.