opinions on my HUD stats

I had a hard time uploading a picture of my HUD stats on CC so I types down my stats. Also, this contains a lot more hands so it should be more accurate.

This is Betonline tournaments with buy-ins of $3-5 and two or three in the range of $10-20 buy ins.


Net Money Won 706Total Hands 2565
VPIP 23.9
PFR 17.1
3-Bet 9.4
Agg 21.4
AF 2
WTSD 53.6
W$SD 48.3
W $ WSF 45.1
Bet When Checked to 47.4
C-Bet 67.1
C-Bet in position 76
C-Bet Out of Position 63.3
Cold Call 10.7
donk Bet 16.3
Double Barrel 70.6
Limp 5.4
River Agg 14.3
Squeeze 8.1
Steal 43.1
Seen River 25.5

Let me know if you see any possible leaks, any pattern that I have and I need to be aware of. I appreciate it. :icon_thum

if there is not 10,000 this is too small:captain:

That's right, 10k is too small a distance to draw conclusions))

What!?

2565 hands is too small a sample to determine whether he is a winning player long-term, but it's a large enough sample for these stats.

No one waits to have 10k hands on an opponent to assess whether they are tight pre-flop, aggressive post-flop, etc.

Mory, are these mostly MTTs or SNGs?

Your stats generally look solid.

The WTSD is the only individual stat that jumps out at me, it's about ten points higher then what I estimate is the top end of the optimal range.

Your AF, VPIP, and PFR are all on the low end of the optimal range. Each of those stats individually look OK to me. But in combination with the high WTSD they tell a story.
You are tight pre-flop, so you often have a good hand post-flop. But post-flop you don't bet those hands enough, and you call too much. Your c-bet stats are pretty good, but it looks like you are too passive and loose on the turn and river.

AlexTheOwl said:

What!?

2565 hands is too small a sample to determine whether he is a winning player long-term, but it's a large enough sample for these stats.

No one waits to have 10k hands on an opponent to assess whether they are tight pre-flop, aggressive post-flop, etc.

Mory, are these mostly MTTs or SNGs?

Your stats generally look solid.

The WTSD is the only individual stat that jumps out at me, it's about ten points higher then what I estimate is the top end of the optimal range.

Your AF, VPIP, and PFR are all on the low end of the optimal range. Each of those stats individually look OK to me. But in combination with the high WTSD they tell a story.
You are tight pre-flop, so you often have a good hand post-flop. But post-flop you don't bet those hands enough, and you call too much. Your c-bet stats are pretty good, but it looks like you are too passive and loose on the turn and river.

Click to expand...

Thank you for the detailed feedback.
These are 100% MTTs with buy-ins of mostly less than $6. It’s on Betonline so basically playing with a fishbowl.
Most of these tournaments are rebuy-Add ons and in the first hour of the tournament I play only premiums or enter those super multiway pots with a hand that plays easily post-flop(baby pair suited connectors)
If I have 88-99+ I shove pre and usually get 1-2 callers which brings in the variance of going to show down too much and also loosing at show down.
This makes the stats tighter than what it actually is because I play like 4-5 hand in the first hour. People just call everything and rebuy so you need to hit hard to win.

I get your point and I have that tendency. I think I rely too much on pot control-show down value when I have a marginal hand like top pair weak kicker or bottom pair on a missed draw river.

So play more aggressive post flop specially on turn and get less sticky with marginals?

MoryMorte said:

Thank you for the detailed feedback.
These are 100% MTTs with buy-ins of mostly less than $6. It’s on Betonline so basically playing with a fishbowl.
Most of these tournaments are rebuy-Add ons and in the first hour of the tournament I play only premiums or enter those super multiway pots with a hand that plays easily post-flop(baby pair suited connectors)
If I have 88-99+ I shove pre and usually get 1-2 callers which brings in the variance of going to show down too much and also loosing at show down.
This makes the stats tighter than what it actually is because I play like 4-5 hand in the first hour. People just call everything and rebuy so you need to hit hard to win.

I get your point and I have that tendency. I think I rely too much on pot control-show down value when I have a marginal hand like top pair weak kicker or bottom pair on a missed draw river.

So play more aggressive post flop specially on turn and get less sticky with marginals?

Click to expand...

Your VPIP and PFR are fine, especially in long-ish nine-handed tournaments (this is why I was asking about STTs). Let me correct myself. I said above that your VPIP was on the low end of the optimal range, but it's really not for this format.

My estimate is that most (not all) winning players in this format will have VPIPs between 15 and 25, with PFRs that are within five points of their VPIP (your VPIP/PFR gap is a little large).
I have no statistical analysis to back that up, it's just an estimate from a modestly profitable long-time winning player in the micros and small stakes.

Pot control with marginal hands is a good thing against opponents who are tight and passive post-flop. But if you are in games where "people just call everything" then the way to take advantage of that is by getting two streets of value with top pair.

More aggressive on the turn and/or river, and less sticky with marginal holdings, sounds like a good plan to me.

These are some solid stats.

AlexTheOwl said:

Your VPIP and PFR are fine, especially in long-ish nine-handed tournaments (this is why I was asking about STTs). Let me correct myself. I said above that your VPIP was on the low end of the optimal range, but it's really not for this format.

My estimate is that most (not all) winning players in this format will have VPIPs between 15 and 25, with PFRs that are within five points of their VPIP (your VPIP/PFR gap is a little large).
I have no statistical analysis to back that up, it's just an estimate from a modestly profitable long-time winning player in the micros and small stakes.

Pot control with marginal hands is a good thing against opponents who are tight and passive post-flop. But if you are in games where "people just call everything" then the way to take advantage of that is by getting two streets of value with top pair.

More aggressive on the turn and/or river, and less sticky with marginal holdings, sounds like a good plan to me.

Click to expand...

Awesome. Thank you again for devoting your time. Everything you said makes sense [emoji41]

playinggameswithu said:

These are some solid stats.

Click to expand...

Thank you [emoji1374]