is it every good to call when short stacked(15BB or under)

P

pat3392

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Total posts
565
Chips
0
been working on my short stack game and realised that if i'm blinds or under and i'm going to raise i need to go all in, as if they reraise me all in i will have the correct odds to call. when antes are applied i should go push/fold mode earlier.

however, what about calling a hand? is this always a bad mood? and if so, why? of course it may be acceptable to call if you have a monster hand and wish to trap players.

when a player has 6 bb or less then calling is a non profitable move, unless they are going to add some all in bluffs on the flop. i worked out some math behind it but i doupt you guys would be interested so i'll omit it.

please give me a detailed answer with some good reasoning, i need to understand the mechanics and not just that calling is bad. thanks in advance!
 
NeverFold

NeverFold

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Total posts
115
Chips
0
Short stack has a very small chance when playing in poker games especially when your other poker players have a large stack margin. It's better to put all in. Short stacks will lose only from ante or post blind.:D
 
O

only_bridge

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Total posts
1,805
Chips
0
been working on my short stack game and realised that if i'm blinds or under and i'm going to raise i need to go all in, as if they reraise me all in i will have the correct odds to call. when antes are applied i should go push/fold mode earlier.

however, what about calling a hand? is this always a bad mood? and if so, why? of course it may be acceptable to call if you have a monster hand and wish to trap players.

when a player has 6 bb or less then calling is a non profitable move, unless they are going to add some all in bluffs on the flop. i worked out some math behind it but i doupt you guys would be interested so i'll omit it.

please give me a detailed answer with some good reasoning, i need to understand the mechanics and not just that calling is bad. thanks in advance!

When you go all-in you have two chances to win. Either everyone folds or you win a showdown.
When you call all-in you only have one chance to win.
Therefor you need a stronger hand to call with than to raise with.

Limping, or smoothcalling, with a shortstack is usally not a great move, but sure, you could limp and make a stop and go, and push all-in on the flop, or limp with a very strong hand to induce a bluff.
 
P

pat3392

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Total posts
565
Chips
0
sorry, i meant limp, not call. so, if i decide to call it should only be to go all in on a not so scary flop?
 
M

mypokergrind

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Total posts
19
Chips
0
sorry, i meant limp, not call. so, if i decide to call it should only be to go all in on a not so scary flop?

You should be going all in pre......and not wasting chips calling to see the flop......short stack poker is push/fold poker......rarely ever is it right to be seeing flops unless of course someone called your all in and that is the reason you see the flop.
 
thepokerkid123

thepokerkid123

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Total posts
917
Chips
0
When <10bb, shove or fold with everything. A little before you get down to 10bb you can be playing shove/fold anyway if you've got reason to be playing tight.

Even at 15bb though the amount of situations where you should be just calling are very minimal. If you're playing fit or fold, you're going to cripple your stack very fast. If you're going to try and steal the pot you have lots more fold equity if you start off raising (it makes your range stronger and removes the call/check options).

As for being short stacked and calling to get action, this is bad for two main reasons:
1: The fold equity is almost always worth more than the extra action. Especially when you're close to or already in the money.
2: If you slow play only your premium hands then your raising range is really, really weak and anyone with eyes and a brain is restealing really wide.
 
kmixer

kmixer

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Total posts
2,936
Chips
0
If you limp or raise you may be doing one of two things.

1) Wasting chips if someone come over the top and you have to fold
2) Allowing medium or big stacks a chance to see a somewhat cheap flop

You want to go all in to avoid number 2 for sure. Number one is just passive play. Do you know any poker pros that have a passive style?
 
Poof

Poof

Made in the USA
Silver Level
Joined
May 21, 2008
Total posts
14,419
Chips
0
When you are SS do not limp. It is shove or fold. You need to be very particular on the hands you play and either raise them or fold them. I suck at tournaments, lol so take my post with a grain of salt, but if you are going to raise it be prepared to go all the way if reraised. If you have ppl acting before you raising, I do not consider calling an option unless you hold nutz, pick a better spot.
 
lektrikguy

lektrikguy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Total posts
1,559
Chips
0
sorry, i meant limp, not call. so, if i decide to call it should only be to go all in on a not so scary flop?

If you just call then push on the flop you are giving him better odds to call, especially if he hits the flop, since there is already more preflop money in the pot. If you decide to play that hand and you are 10-15 BB then your only play is to push preflop.
 
P

pat3392

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Total posts
565
Chips
0
Well, I decided to do so math to help me answer this question, tell me what you think. The math is going to quite rough as there are too many variables to do accurately; criticism welcomed!


Ok, so let's make a scenario: let's say that I'm at my local venue, I've got 13BB and am the big blind. They're were 5 limpers and I look down at J10o. Ok, their is 3 options:

1) Fold. This move has a EV of 0. Obvious, huh? The good thing to this is that you could potentially get a better hand to make a move. Not going to focus on this though

2) Call. Ok, now this part is going to be quite dodgy; hopefully it is reasonably accurate. At this particular venue they call quite lightly, so I doubt moving all here would be a profitable move. 2/3rds of the time I will miss entirely. The 1/3rd of the time I do hit I'll bet 2.5 blinds. I expect most players would call if they hit any piece of the board, such is most of these players nature. Therefore, 5x1/3 of the time players will call. Therefore, 10.2 will be on the turn on average(6 from blinds, 4.2 from calls[5/3 *2.5 =4.2]). If I bet again they'd either fold , or call me till the end. So, if they fold, I'll make on average 3.4 (10.2*1/3=3.4). If they call till the end, I reckon I'd be ahead more than 50% of the time. I could do lots of math to figure out how often they'd call till the end and when they do, how often I'd beat them, but I'll see what you guys think first.Let's say I'd win 60% of the time. If they did call till the end I would make 17.52 on average (I have 13BB. Called once, then raised 2.5. Therefore I'd have 9.5BB left when there's 10.2 in the pot. Let's say one player call till the end. 10.2 +9.5+9.5=29.2 29.2*.6=17.52)

Actually, the all in EV is probably a little less, as I did not count in when I call and miss a flop, that would reduce my stake until I actually hit.

3) Ok, now for going all in. They call all sorts of stuff here. I reckon that they'd:
call suited connectors from 34 till 89, raise the rest
call all aces, raise from A8 onwards
call all kings, raise from K9 onwards
call all queens, raise from Q9 onwards
call all jacks, raise from J9 onwards
call all pockets, raise from 77 onwards

Now that I am going over this, I'd reckon they'd call more hands than that and raise much less, which makes errors in the data.

I think they'd call an all in with:
A5-A8
K-6-9
Q9
22-77

Therefore, each player would fold 2/3rds of the time (did it through combination's; going to skip some of the math. If you are actually interested then ask and I'll add how I did it.) Therefore, on average I'll get 2 callers. This is flawed though; they are less likely to call my all in if someone else has already done that, and I havn't factored in image whatsoever; when I'm justing starting to go into push/fold mode, people's calling range would be MUCH higher, but after I have abused it a fair bit they tend to call me this lightly. I guess for this scenario we can presume that I have being pushing a lot.

Ok, now I did some more math that I will omit, but J10 suprisingly has 50% equity against they're calling range. This to is flawed as it is presuming that people are not slow playing monsters, and I think players would probably raise less of those hands and call more of them, which makes my equity lower. Let's say then that my equity is 45%, and that if one player calls my all in another won't call it. Therefore, I'll get called 2/3rds of the time.

When they fold I'll make 5 BB. This happens 1/3rd of the time so I will make 5/3 BB from stealing. When they call I'll make 30*.45*2/3, which is 9. So, from going all in I'd make 5/3+9 which equals 14.3, so approximately 14BB on average.



So, If I call I'll make 3.4BB on average if I don't get much action, and 17.5BB If I do. If I go all in, I'd make 14BB on average.

This is obviously quite rough; I think the players don't call/limp that lightly, I just probably notice it more when someone does call really lightly. I should also work out how often that they would call an all in if they call the turn, so that I can compare the numbers. However, by doing this I think that if I have been raising all in a little too much then I should slow down and play mediocre hands in decent position. This will help disguise a monster too if I want to slow play.

Obviously, this probably won't apply to most of you guys as you probably don't play with these sorts of players. Still, let me know what you think. I am going to play at the local venue in a few hours so I'll take note of what cards they limp with and what they call with.
 
dwolfg

dwolfg

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Total posts
583
Chips
0
In general, I agree with the majority opinion here, but poker is a game of situations. If you can limp in, and still have your stack be somewhat threatening to the others at the table if you have to fold postflop, at a table that is loose passive preflop with a hand that you can hit hard or fold easily, then I can agree with the limp.
 
P

playerk7

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Total posts
256
Chips
0
i wouldnt recommend it but if you have something you think is good like aj and are unsure if your out kicked, id see a flop first
 
T

tookie21

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Total posts
68
Chips
0
I've no math to back it up, but sometimes you just get a feeling that your cards are good. If I can limp in short stacked, see if I'm right, and still have a reasonable amount of chips left to mount my comeback - I'll do it.
 
P

playerk7

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Total posts
256
Chips
0
the only time i like to call short stack is when i get dealt a monster and i want to try and triple up, the backdraw to that is i might get sucked out on which i can live with those consiquences before seeing the flop
 
Top