+EV how to figure it out?

T

Teebone

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
180
Chips
0
How do i figure out on my own, whethere a play i just made is a +EV play or not?

Sorry about the fishy question i know i should know this by now.

Started watching video's and stuff, really working on my game. Im going back and looking at my sng's but i dont know how to tell if a play i made is +EV.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
equity is comprised of pretty much 3 things:

1. Pot equity - this is the chance your hand has of being the best relative to pot odds (there's a very good discussion of pot odds and equity in the Strategy Articles tab).
2. Fold equity - this is the chance (an estimate) that Villain will fold his hand to your action (i.e., your bet or your raise). Harder to quantify, since you don't literally KNOW what % of the time he'll fold.
3. Implied odds - this is the chance that Villain will pay off more than is currently in the pot when you have the best hand at showdown. Again, harder to quantify, depends on whether Villain will pay off your (for example) rivered flush when you shove all in, or will fold when the flush hits.

So for any specific action, you can evaluate the overall equity by adding up your pot equity (straightforward math - you either had the odds to make your action or you didn't relative to the size of the pot, the size of the action, and how likely your hand is to be best at showdown), your fold equity (estimated), and implied odds (estimated).

For SnG's and MTT's, you also need to distinguish your cEv (chip accumulation expected value) vs. your $Ev (money won expected value) - a plus cEv action may not be a plus $Ev action. I'm weaker on this topic, so I'll let someone who knows this better expand... ;)
 
jernest

jernest

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Total posts
187
Chips
0
For SnG's and MTT's, you also need to distinguish your cEv (chip accumulation expected value) vs. your $Ev (money won expected value) - a plus cEv action may not be a plus $Ev action. I'm weaker on this topic, so I'll let someone who knows this better expand... ;)

Basics are, in MTTs and SnGs, each registrant starts off with their own share of $Ev(equity) of the prize pool and given various factors like skill level of individual and playing style/skill of opponents each individual player will have their own personally sized expected piece of the pie. each time someone is eliminated all other participants gain the $Ev that is left behind (whatever their share was.

If say you are fresh into a 9 seat SnG, have QQ and super LAG raises all in just like his last 4 hands. You have 1500 chips and villain has 1600ish. This is a +cEv call. However it is possibly a -$Ev call because you are risking your entire equity on this call, depends on villains, albeit loose, range.

Say you and villain have identical stacks and villain shoves into you on the button with QQ. We'll say first hand of the tourney. If you call and win you gain his chips but his equity gets distributed amongst all other participants. You doubled your chips but your equity does not now double.
Basically you risk your entire tournament equity for only part of villains.
The equity odds are not favorable for the call.

Well, not for you anyways, only for your tablemates your call is +++$Ev. In that situation (early tourney) calling with less than KK is not recommended. They gain equity for no risk.

Later in the tourney and ITM calling with QQ on shorthanded table, there, is +$EV. In the end game shoving a -cEv hand is many times +$Ev.

If you are not a tourney player, I am sorry if I may have confused things here, because tourney cEv/$Ev decisions are f*@%ing confusing when you start to work with them... hence why many can't go between Ring and cash.:eek:

If you are a tourney player, Colin Moshman's SnG book explains the cEV/$EV situation pretty well and you should read it if you can.

Hope this helps.
Good Luck
 
W

WiZZiM

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Total posts
5,008
Chips
0
Basics are, in MTTs and SnGs, each registrant starts off with their own share of $Ev(equity) of the prize pool and given various factors like skill level of individual and playing style/skill of opponents each individual player will have their own personally sized expected piece of the pie. each time someone is eliminated all other participants gain the $Ev that is left behind (whatever their share was.
equity when we talk in terms of tournaments usually refers to how much of the prize pool your stack is worth at any given time... this uised to be worked out using the chip chop method.. but it had its obvious flaws. so they developed ICM to counter these problems... One key concept is this though.. when you win a tournament you only win a certain % of the prize pool. all the equity is based of that.

but assuming equal skill level.. at the start of a tournament everyone starst off the with same amount of equity. then after the first hand that changes, as someone gains chip and someone loses chips.. but yes.. that is not really true as some players with higher skill actually have more equity if they think they are better than most of the field.. so his chips are actually worth more than some novice whos never played before..


If say you are fresh into a 9 seat SnG, have QQ and super LAG raises all in just like his last 4 hands. You have 1500 chips and villain has 1600ish. This is a +cEv call. However it is possibly a -$Ev call because you are risking your entire equity on this call, depends on villains, albeit loose, range.
early on with QQ this is usually both plus Cev and +$EV to get it in with Queens.. depends on your stake of playing sng.. say your on the bubble and a big stack raises you all in.. you have the same QQ,, then its more likely to be +cEV and -$EV
Say you and villain have identical stacks and villain shoves into you on the button with QQ. We'll say first hand of the tourney. If you call and win you gain his chips but his equity gets distributed amongst all other participants. You doubled your chips but your equity does not now double.
Basically you risk your entire tournament equity for only part of villains.
The equity odds are not favorable for the call.
The first hand of the tourney a small % of equity is distributed.. in later stages.. its personified and becomes a massive spew of equity if say you shove and get called on the bubble..

Well, not for you anyways, only for your tablemates your call is +++$Ev. In that situation (early tourney) calling with less than KK is not recommended. They gain equity for no risk.
This is true for STT but with MTT were only concerned with CEV,, only at the final table are we concerned about $EV

Later in the tourney and ITM calling with QQ on shorthanded table, there, is +$EV. In the end game shoving a -cEv hand is many times +$Ev.

If you are not a tourney player, I am sorry if I may have confused things here, because tourney cEv/$Ev decisions are f*@%ing confusing when you start to work with them... hence why many can't go between Ring and cash.:eek: tourney players are only concerned with accumulating chips, so its cEV.

If you are a tourney player, Colin Moshman's SnG book explains the cEV/$EV situation pretty well and you should read it if you can.

Hope this helps.
Good Luck


just to show examples of what hes reffering to.. when we go all in a lose equity.. here its a standard 9 handed table sng. first hand we do lose equity but we gain quite a bit.. second example is on the bubble, here its a massive spew of equity to get it in with equal stacks...
 

Attachments

  • ICM.JPG
    ICM.JPG
    115.9 KB · Views: 44
  • ICM2.JPG
    ICM2.JPG
    98.6 KB · Views: 44
W

WiZZiM

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Total posts
5,008
Chips
0
as ytou can see in the later example, were spewing 11% equity to the other players when they werent even involved in the hand..

sorry and to repeat again we used cEV in MTT, until the final table then were concerned about $EV...

in sng were using $EV

Heads up its strickly cEV
 
Last edited:
jernest

jernest

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Total posts
187
Chips
0
WiZZiM - thanks for expanding on my post... better explained with your additions
 
T

Teebone

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Total posts
180
Chips
0
Definately going to have to re-read these post's a couple times to get the hang of it.

Thanks guys much appreciated.
 
Top