Which client has the best MTT structures

I currently use Betonline and am thinking of jumping ship due to the structure changes.

as for me, i like 888 because of their promotions, but poker stars have much more bigger choice of tournaments

It depends on where you live as to the options you will have. ACR is where I play the most with the best structures but my options here are limited as can be.

Rackbone said:

I currently use Betonline and am thinking of jumping ship due to the structure changes.

Click to expand...

888Poker has a variety of tournaments with different structures as well as pokerstars, the structure of the acr tournaments are usually slow tournaments most, in partypoker the majority changed to turbo but almost all tournaments are deepstack with 100k, 200k, and 50k starting chips

happy

Rackbone said:

I currently use Betonline and am thinking of jumping ship due to the structure changes.

Click to expand...

I think Americas cardroom is the best bigger and better and graphics are better

veritasi said:

as for me, i like 888 because of their promotions, but poker stars have much more bigger choice of tournaments

Click to expand...

well unfortionately us USA players we don't have them options:elefant:

Its because they have nothing to loose they want a quick jumpstart on there chipstack and will go allin with any 2 cards

Acr has the best structure and betonline had a nice structure as well.

nolifescotty said:

well unfortionately us USA players we don't have them options:elefant:

Click to expand...

didn't know this)

pokerstars by far, if nothing more because they have most tourneys so many different game tipes...

Stars is unbeatable though 888 competes well. I sometimes go on Stars to play the Cards Chat home games and dream of playing their high value tournaments.

nolifescotty said:

Its because they have nothing to loose they want a quick jumpstart on there chipstack and will go allin with any 2 cards

Click to expand...

Hey I see you on ACR tourneys frequently. Good to see you are on CC also.