Why go "all-in" In?

veronica

veronica

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Total posts
571
Chips
0
When you are between 40 and 60 big blinds you should not be afraid to finish all in with hands like A-K or 10 to 10 before the flop or A-Q and Q-7-3 flop. You should do well control with hands like top pair, weak kicker, but with better hands should be happy to finish all in in a tournament.
If you make a raise pre-flop with AQ, AK, 10-10, JJ, QQ, KK or AA and receive a re-raise in response, you should go all in when you have less than 60 blind unless your opponent is an extremely passive player .
Here's an example: You have a stack of 50 big blinds and raise pre-flop 2.5 big blinds with A-Q. An aggressive player responds with a 3-Bet 7 big blinds on the button. In this situation you should go all in pre-flop.
If you made the preflop raise in top positions, the situation changes slightly as your opponents will mean you're coming up with a strong range of hands. In that case, you should fold the A-Q to a 3-bet, but go all in with A-K, 10-10 J-J, Q-Q, K-K or A-A.
Against the most aggressive players you must be willing to gamble pre-flop with a wider range of hands. Suppose you have an aggressive style of play, a stack of 40 BB and raise pre-flop 2.5 blind in middle position against tight players in the blinds. A rival tight (solid). "> Loose aggressive (LAG) who knows your game reraises to 7 blind in the cutoff.
In that case you can gamble pre-flop with a variety of hands as likely that you achieve the fold of your opponents. To do this you must know their tendencies and playing styles.
 
thechamp5

thechamp5

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Total posts
102
Chips
0
Dude, 60 BB is a ton of BB and you should probably slow down. Punting away tournaments on coin flips and using push-fold charts to make decisions is only increasing variance and going to provide negative results. I am going to have to disagree with your philosophy and say you shouldn't be shoving with all these hands with 60 BBs, re-raising and bullying stacks with less than 60 BBs is totally acceptable, but to make deeper more profitable runs you shouldn't play like that. If poker was that simple than everyone would win.
 
TeUnit

TeUnit

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Total posts
4,777
Awards
14
Chips
122
no, you should not go all in with 60bbs

to be able to go all in with 60bbs you should have AA and be calling, not shoving
 
BentleyBoy

BentleyBoy

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Total posts
2,384
Awards
8
Chips
309
Hmm! Is there any 'one way' of playing poker?

If you feel like going all in with 60bb then that is your style of play. It may not be as profitable as playing a more conventional approach, but if that's how you want to play then play on...... Just don't be surprised if no one calls you and you don't make real progression in tournaments...... Or a better made hand calls you and you lose.

There are optimum ways to play poker to maximise the benefit you get from other players, either because they are weak, or they have worse hands..... But simply shoving at the stage you describe, won't necessarily provide a strong base for winning tournaments.
 
Ekateriba Zapletnyuk

Ekateriba Zapletnyuk

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Total posts
131
Chips
0
I go all-in , only if I have AA or KK , and sometimes when I'm really tired:D
 
R

redmast

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Jun 12, 2016
Total posts
1,989
Awards
2
Chips
138
You're wrong. When I have 60bb then I try to play even tighter. And Allin go only at very high premium pair. If you play by your scheme is not long remain without any chips. This is only possible if your card goes well at the moment. But you can not all the time happy.
 
Dunc8b

Dunc8b

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Total posts
660
Chips
0
Not that I have lots of experience so far but I am regularly seeing players in MTTs (and *nit* in the early Bingo times) who seem to think that because they have a huge chip lead on the table they are invincible and keep gong all-in. They are only normally picking up the blinds and maybe a couple of other antis. THEN... someone decides that their AA is enough to take a chance. They win and it's shown that the hotshot was going all-in with nothing.

That then opens them up to other players taking a chance with a lesser pairing and before long they are either out or have damaged their stack to put them back with the crowd.

I would agree that it is an option, but not a certainty.
 
EvertonGirl

EvertonGirl

Professional Fish
Loyaler
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Total posts
8,423
Awards
3
GB
Chips
112
I don't like to get it all in with AK when I have 60bbs.

I like to have 30bb when I think about shoving AK pre... for AQ I like to shove that when I have 15bb.
 
D

DB21

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Total posts
12
Chips
0
I don't think with 60BB in hand there is any way to go all-in pre-flop .. Only if you are 100% after the flop/turn/river I think you should go all-in. 60BB are too many chips to go all-in, even with A-A IMO
 
pretorijan

pretorijan

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Total posts
279
Chips
0
hmm,hard question.I think its right to go all in.
 
SorinNeamtul

SorinNeamtul

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Total posts
30
Chips
0
Dude, 60 BB is a ton of BB and you should probably slow down. Punting away tournaments on coin flips and using push-fold charts to make decisions is only increasing variance and going to provide negative results. I am going to have to disagree with your philosophy and say you shouldn't be shoving with all these hands with 60 BBs, re-raising and bullying stacks with less than 60 BBs is totally acceptable, but to make deeper more profitable runs you shouldn't play like that. If poker was that simple than everyone would win.
I love your answer! By the way, are you a chess player?
 
Top