What's the best way to play 2 2

Elliegurl

Elliegurl

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Total posts
792
Chips
0
Any thoughts on how and when it is the best time to play this hand? Most of the time, I just fold 2 2 rather than play it.

Suggestions anyone?
 
NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
Fold it. Except button stealing blinds perhaps, or when small stack went all in, nobody else called, and you are a very big stack. I only play MTTs though.
 
cardplayer52

cardplayer52

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Total posts
1,232
Chips
0
i play them like any small pair. i most will only put about 5% of my stack in the pot pre flop. i hope to flop a set. i will rarely raise with them. but i will raise to steal the blinds later in a tourney. if i don't thik i can get the correct odds to set mine i usaully fold them as well as 66-33.
 
P

perry

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Total posts
115
Chips
0
I call with any small pair from any position simply because they can go from weak to strong on the flop of a set. An interviening raise causes me to fold depending size of raise and chips I have. If I'm in a late position - any raise from the right shuts me down. It is hard for me to throw away any potential winning hand - regardless of the pair value.
 
NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
I am much less likely to play 22 than I am 66, 77, or 88, because 22 loses to any other pair out there, so it's quite weak. Unless I have a big enough stack to be set mining.
 
T

tdude

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Total posts
109
Chips
0
the best way is fold unless you are big blind, in which case if you do not hit a set on the flop, fold
 
H

highstakes64

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Total posts
9
Chips
0
i slow play them..never raise just calls and checks..and hopefully you can catch another 2, and if you do..wait till the river to finally bet, and if you dont then fold
 
T

teksmith

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Total posts
128
Chips
0
Try to limp from late position to see a flop. If no 2 check/fold as you probably are far behind. eary position they are non-starters.
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Chips
0
heads up, 22 is a foldable hand for sure
 
JessyMoneyAA

JessyMoneyAA

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Total posts
42
Chips
0
I fold never pairs unless there is a raiser before me. So 2 2 i would call in any position
 
twizzybop

twizzybop

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Total posts
2,380
Chips
0
so what I am reading is to fold, fold, fold it. So lets see lets fold any pocket pair. There are circumstances to not folding any pocket pair and of course the obvious is when the set hits on the flop. Being scared to play pocket 22's is like being scared of playing A,K but hey more will race with A,K compared to pocket 22's. Yet odd that pocket 22's are ahead A,K in a race..

Pocket 22's can also be treated like pocket KK's when an ace comes on the flop as well. Would I play them? Not in early postion based that any raise it is hard to make a call with. Late postion is more likely for me to either limp or raise with.
 
NoWuckingFurries

NoWuckingFurries

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Total posts
3,834
Awards
1
Chips
29
It is incorrect to suggest that folding 22 is the same as folding any pocket pair. Let's suppose that the flop is 3 6 9 rainbow for example, anybody with a 3, a 6 or a 9 has us beaten if we have 22. If we had pocket 8s, for example, only a 9 or an overpair would beat us. 22 will only just beat ace high!
 
K

kevkojak

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Total posts
555
Chips
0
Why is everyone so blinded by the fact that 2 2 could, possibly, maybe make a set? If you pull that off and find a 3rd on the flop (8-1 odd's against it roughly), would you still be willing to back them against a pot sized bet? Pocket pairs lower than 8's have gotten me in trouble more times than I'd care to remember, set or no set. There are far better cards to get your cash behind, throw away low pairs unless your 6 handed or less, or your last to act with no bets in the pot.
 
twizzybop

twizzybop

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Total posts
2,380
Chips
0
yeah only a 9 beats you not to mention any 2 pair and A9,K9, someone looking for the straight especially one whom holds 10,7(granted it gives him less outs to hit but if it does come you are in trouble). Not to mention the limper whom limped with pocket 10's or JJ's. But no 22's on that flop beat more then just ace high, with that flop your options with 88's are just about equal with 22's. If you aren't afraid of that high 9 then by all means become a calling station with the pocket 88's when someone bets out. What we want at most whilst holding any pocket pair is the set on the rainbow flop.
 
twizzybop

twizzybop

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Total posts
2,380
Chips
0
Why is everyone so blinded by the fact that 2 2 could, possibly, maybe make a set? If you pull that off and find a 3rd on the flop (8-1 odd's against it roughly), would you still be willing to back them against a pot sized bet? Pocket pairs lower than 8's have gotten me in trouble more times than I'd care to remember, set or no set. There are far better cards to get your cash behind, throw away low pairs unless your 6 handed or less, or your last to act with no bets in the pot.


Such as?? A,K or A,Q that needs help to win whilst the pocket pair needs no help. Somewhere there is a need for leveling out of being afraid to play small pocket pairs and over valuing A,K and A,Q...

The happy medium is the way to go, compared to constantly folding small pairs and constantly raising 2 cards just because it is the A,K and/or A,Q.
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Chips
0
Such as?? A,K or A,Q that needs help to win whilst the pocket pair needs no help. Somewhere there is a need for leveling out of being afraid to play small pocket pairs and over valuing A,K and A,Q...

The happy medium is the way to go, compared to constantly folding small pairs and constantly raising 2 cards just because it is the A,K and/or A,Q.

when you're playing AK or AQ, you're playing it because your opponent can have lower Ax's, such as AT or AJ, and when the flop comes A53r, you can win a fair bit of money from him.

when you're playing 22 and your opponent has those same Ax hands in his hand, you're much less likely to win even close to that amount of money from him (you'll need to flop a set and have him flop a pair).

so when you're playing 22 against the slew of hands your opponent can have, you're putting yourself in a less profitable situation than if you had a hand such as AQ in that spot.

the fact that 22 "doesn't need to improve" or "is ahead of AK in a race" means nothing because you aren't pitting those hands against each other, you're pitting those hands against your opponent's possible holdings
 
twizzybop

twizzybop

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Total posts
2,380
Chips
0
can have(hope to have, stop thinking superstitiously), on your suggestive flop means opponent can also have AX which that rag has paired whilst your A,K needs help, You are forgetting the cardinal rule that most people who play this game over value the ace, so your A,K or A,Q is in trouble. Just because you've now over valued the hand(hence re-read the part about having a happy medium). Less likely to win?? Long term even pocket 22's vs A,K you are a favorite to win(51% to be exact). Again a pocket pair is , will be, and always be ahead against 2 random cards that aren't a pocket pair that is higher then yours. If you think that playing 22's is less profitable then playing the over valued ace and/or king. Then you are crazy

The over valued ace and king need help no matter what, and they will always be behind any pocket pair, so long term it is much better to have a pocket pair compared to 2 random cards that aren't a pocket pair.

So it doesnt matter what my opponents have especially since that number 1 the ace or king they hold is over valued by them, 2 they ace and king need help in catching up to me, 3 it is easier to dump the pocket pair compared to the over valued ace and king.

Now you don't think the ace and king is over valued, then by all means watch some of the wsop or even hold-em tournies that are shown on t,v and see how many call all-ins pre flop while holding the ace or king.
People are predictable, once they see that ace(bells and whistles go off in thier head thinking they have the cat's meow, not to mention the king as well). With a pocket pair even the 22's that doesn't hardly happen, easy cards to get away from and long term can win the race more often against the a,k.
 
A

andres_arg

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 14, 2007
Total posts
76
Chips
0
I would fold this, or check/call min raise if im BB or SB. This may be good if you get trips on the flop or a straight draw.. it depends of your stack imo.
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Chips
0
can have(hope to have, stop thinking superstitiously), on your suggestive flop means opponent can also have AX which that rag has paired whilst your A,K needs help, You are forgetting the cardinal rule that most people who play this game over value the ace, so your A,K or A,Q is in trouble. Just because you've now over valued the hand(hence re-read the part about having a happy medium). Less likely to win?? Long term even pocket 22's vs A,K you are a favorite to win(51% to be exact). Again a pocket pair is , will be, and always be ahead against 2 random cards that aren't a pocket pair that is higher then yours. If you think that playing 22's is less profitable then playing the over valued ace and/or king. Then you are crazy

The over valued ace and king need help no matter what, and they will always be behind any pocket pair, so long term it is much better to have a pocket pair compared to 2 random cards that aren't a pocket pair.

So it doesnt matter what my opponents have especially since that number 1 the ace or king they hold is over valued by them, 2 they ace and king need help in catching up to me, 3 it is easier to dump the pocket pair compared to the over valued ace and king.

Now you don't think the ace and king is over valued, then by all means watch some of the wsop or even hold-em tournies that are shown on t,v and see how many call all-ins pre flop while holding the ace or king.
People are predictable, once they see that ace(bells and whistles go off in thier head thinking they have the cat's meow, not to mention the king as well). With a pocket pair even the 22's that doesn't hardly happen, easy cards to get away from and long term can win the race more often against the a,k.

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

3,349,266,624 games 0.011 secs 304,478,784,000 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 43.972% 40.36% 03.61% 1351673676 121075614.00 { 77+, A7s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QJo }
Hand 1: 56.028% 52.41% 03.61% 1755441720 121075614.00 { AQo }


Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

2,054,764,800 games 0.005 secs 410,952,960,000 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 57.325% 56.93% 00.39% 1169792160 8099112.00 { 77+, A7s+, K9s+, QTs+, JTs, ATo+, KTo+, QJo }
Hand 1: 42.675% 42.28% 00.39% 868774416 8099112.00 { 22 }


you lose.


/thread
 
blankoblanco

blankoblanco

plays poker on hard mode
Silver Level
Joined
May 16, 2006
Total posts
6,129
Chips
0
twizzy, almost every winning cash player with a large enough sample wins more on average with AK than they win with 22. this isn't debatable. IS. NOT. DEBATABLE. if you had HEM or PT3 or some other hand tracking device, you could make this and all sorts of other neat discoveries and maybe actually become decent at poker

get any winning cash player with hold 'em manager who has a large sample to post their top winning hands. AK will be near the top 5 most of the time. 22 will almost never be, and the only way it will be is if they've run super ridiculously abnormally above expectation at flopping sets with deuces
 
S

switch0723

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Total posts
8,430
Chips
0
oh cool twizzybop is back
 
Dwilius

Dwilius

CardsChat Regular
Silver Level
Joined
May 5, 2008
Total posts
7,584
Awards
34
Chips
0
Saying pocket twos are a favorite over ace-king long term and at the same time saying not to call with eights on 9 high flop is just silly. Obviously you are going to get pushed off deuces when AK cbets a flop that misses you both. You'll be folding the best hand often, 50%+ is only relevant on preflop allins.

To play 22 you should have well more than set odds and a likelihood your opponent will get all in with one pair hands since your set won't always get action and when it does you'll also see combo draws and sometimes higher sets that have good or excellent equity against your hand.
 
Last edited:
Top