Its a good style to play. You also want to be able to change and be loose-aggressive if your table is tight. It all will really depend on the people you are playing.
seems to me at full tilt the most profitable style is comlete retardation/luckbox...
seems to me at full tilt the most profitable style is comlete retardation/luckbox...
seems to me at full tilt the most profitable style is comlete retardation/luckbox...
seems to me at full tilt the most profitable style is comlete retardation/luckbox...
I was playing in the Hubble freeroll last night and people were playing ATC, then somebody limped with a pair of aces and took about four people out of the tournament that went all-in with nothing. He was really criticised for limping in with a pair of aces, but actually I thought it was a very effective strategy in that situation, and have subsequently used it myself at tables where people are willing to play any old rubbish.I recently had the privalege of attending a seminar given by Phil Gordon. He definitely hold on tightly to the tight aggressive style. However, I don't aggree with everything he said. He is dead set against limping in on a hand. He claims that he will never do that. In most cases I aggree with him, but I feel that limping into a pot is the best play in a very select situations. What's your opinion? Do you aggree with Phil?
seems to me at full tilt the most profitable style is comlete retardation/luckbox...