leosam18
Rock Star
Platinum Level
If you turn this on its head and instead of learning "how" to play by the book but use the book as a means to exploitation. I have this thing about TAGs... I love em... they're so easy to beat as they do play by the book. There's nothing wrong in TAG playing by itself... it's a winning strategy...but... if everybody except me played by the book... I'd be winning as I'd know how you're all playing
Hi just want to hear other players think....
Does it make a player terrible by not playing by the book ?? on taking a risk by playing a thrash hands like 72 etc.. vs. premium hands but winning the trash hand with flying colors...
Thanks and pls feel free to comment..
Hi just want to hear other players think....
Does it make a player terrible by not playing by the book ?? on taking a risk by playing a thrash hands like 72 etc.. vs. premium hands but winning the trash hand with flying colors...
Thanks and pls feel free to comment..
This is partly true but not as easily exploitable as you might think.
If you are targeting the tags at the table instead of the loose passives then you wont be particularly profitable.
Hi just want to hear other players think....
Does it make a player terrible by not playing by the book ?? on taking a risk by playing a thrash hands like 72 etc.. vs. premium hands but winning the trash hand with flying colors...
Thanks and pls feel free to comment..
Like all things Poker, it depends.
If you are telling us you have read the books, seen the videos and understand them, but you want to play unconventionally beating TAGs with surprise hands it might work. One has to be very good for this to work in the long run. Why? TAGs will adjust and some time when you drop the hammer with top 2, you are going to be shown trips.