Starting hand selection.
I keep a sklanski chart on my desktop, fairly stuck on it for starting hands, but my question to everyone is how much weight should I place on my recorded history and results for each hand.
Just started back with poker stars
a little while ago and only have a 5000 hand sample size, but according to my hand history my hands are presently ranked according to winning as follows.
Some surprising results for the biggest losers, 7-3s has beaten ATo and AKs is near the bottom of the pack. Nearly every hand has beaten AKs. AKs has only returned me chips once.
Some of those top hands are instant folds, just played cheap from the blinds.
My question, may sound stupid, but should I pay attention to these stats, or pitch them and assume things will even out given more hands.