Positional aggression or tight play

Is it beter to be agresiv from position no mater what card you hold or is it smarter to sit tight and whait for boomb card like AK suited or pair 10ns and stronger and play it agresiv?

There are so many other factors involved it would be a mistake to just decide one way or the other. The great thing about position is not only can you make more money with smart play, like being aggressive with any cards at the RIGHT time, but you can save a lot of money by folding what started out as strong preflop hands that got ruined by juicy board textures against the wrong opponent.

I prefer the latter one which is being TA.

But add of course playing with position on my repertoire.

Agree above, mix it up since poker is dynamic and situational.

poker is all about mixing up .... there is no only one way to Play to optimal way... see the table n Players n mix it up .. mix ur game to be lag , tag n maniac game somtimes .. but of course we Need huge loads of games to be able to Play like this .. remember experience is key

I don't think you want to play every pot when you have positional advantage. You can loosen your starting range a little bit, but you should still only get into hands where you have an edge.

i agree , aggressive play its not good for your money realy i try it and its not good at tables u have tons of fish who call u with 5 pair on table whats next?

my mind tells me if you begin to play agression - play it all the board.
That's the right desicion