PLO pf play

slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
These are general thoughts about pf play in PLO from a noob who's converting from NLHE. I've put in about 45k hands at micro now (almost all at 6max) and watched some vids, and thought it'd help me to write out what my current thinking is. A lot of these thoughts specifically compare/contrast what I think the "correct" NLHE concept is vs. the "correct" PLO concept, since I think alot of what I'm challenged by in PLO is a set of preconceptions I have from NLHE.

I appreciate corrections/comments/additional suggestions!

1. Position - Everyone puts this first, so I'm going w the flow. But postflop play in PLO is so much about having position that it has to inform pf decisions. So, a couple of things about position:

a. Completing from the small blind is a leak, just like completing A rag or small pairs in the sb in NLHE. If you complete a raggy hand in PLO, you're going to be forced to c/f most flops, and worse if you catch a piece of the board, you're going to c/c or b/f the flop, and if you get to the turn you're going to c/f the turn. If you do happen to hit the flop, you're going to have problems extracting value from the hand (just like in NLHE).

b. EP opens need to be strong, and calling open raises from BB need to be relatively strong - see a. above.

c. Our LP range can be really really wide - we can make frequent stabs at small/medium pots that get checked around to us. Anyone who's c/c'ing the flop is generally drawing or has a weak made hand (overpair, top pair), and anyone who c/r's the flop is generally showing up w a monster.

2. Opening the pot - In general, open the pot w a raise - initiative is still important in PLO, but is not as much of a factor postflop as in NLHE - there are many boards that we'll open raise and c/f or check behind as pfr because they're too dangerous to cbet. But open limping is bad in PLO just like in NLHE. Overlimping, though, is not a leak in PLO the way it is in NLHE. FE in PLO is very poor because hand values run so close together in PLO (and because PLO players call too much pf). Seeing a flop w a good hand ip cheaply is a good thing, and bloating the pot w very little FE pf w a good hand is a leak.

3. 3betting - Why do we 3bet in NLHE? For value when we have a strong hand, for value when we think we're ahead of Villain's range, for FE, to isolate, and obv for image.

First off, in PLO, 3bets have very little FE cuz hand ranges run so close together and cuz people call pf w marginal holdings (micro stakes, but from vids I believe this is the case up through small stakes as well).

Isolating and 3betting when we think we're ahead of Villain's range have value in PLO, say when you're on BTN vs. a CO open, but trying to isolate over multiple limpers does not.

In PLO, we obv 3bet for value when we have a strong hand. But what's a strong hand when equities run so close together and 3betting has little FE? Strong hands are those that will flop well. What hands flop well? Highly coordinated hands, specificaly suited rundowns and suited AAxx/KKxx. Pairs suck, though coordinated pairs have value (JJT9ss for example).

In PLO, having a very small 3bet range is an immediate tipoff that you're only 3betting AAxx. Against regs, this is a problem, since your hand is face up. For this image purpose alone it's important to have other hands in your 3betting range - but we shouldn't stray too far from those very solid hands (except against really bad players who we know fold a lot to 3bets and/or fold a lot to cbets).

4. Calling 3bets - If villain is almost certainly 3betting AAxx, we'd first like to know if he'll fold postflop - a player who gets it all in w an overpair is a goldmine and is spewing implied odds. Setmining and calling w strong rundowns is good. If villain's range is wider, we can 4bet our strong rundowns. Setmining loses some of it's value against players who will fold AAxx and/or have wider 3betting ranges, so calling w pairs that aren't coordinated (i.e., JJT9ss) isn't as profitable.

5. Villain types and table dynamics - Obv we can be more aggressive against villains who play very poorly postflop (by poorly I mean either they can't hand read or they're so predictable postflop that their hands are face up). Need to pay attention to ss's when opening just as in NLHE (they can bloat the pot and force a premature decision point just like in NLHE). Need to pay attention to everyone's stack sizes in determining whether to enter the pot just like in NLHE - but because of the pot limit restriction on betsizing, we need to pay attention very specifically to how many psb's remain in effective stacks in order to manage risk - pf open raise sizes will change that dynamic in a hurry. Need to pay attention to how passive/agg players are postflop - passive players are easy to play against postflop, but bloating the pot pf against an agg player is a tricky proposition postflop (and we really want position on the agg player postflop).

6. Open raise sizing - This is something I'm just starting to play w. I've been using pot open raises, but this is a prob against ss's (for the same reasons it's a prob against NLHE ss's). But it's also a pot management exercise - open raising psb limits your ability to make plays postflop if you have 100bb's effective. Vanessa Selbst makes this point explicitly, but bluntly I haven't had much success w less than psb open raises to this point.
 
Last edited:
IveGot0uts

IveGot0uts

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Total posts
444
Chips
0
Great post sly. I have been thinking more and more of making a move towards some flavor of omaha for the new fishville shinyness of the game. In moving to Omaha did you experiment with PLO v FL or NL? How about 6max v FR? What did you play primarily in NLHE, 6max or FR? If you would, could you give reasons why you settled on the variation that you have?

I love the compare/contrast approach with NLHE for someone trying to get his brain more in the proper frame for the Omaha.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
Great post sly.

Thanks!

I have been thinking more and more of making a move towards some flavor of omaha for the new fishville shinyness of the game. In moving to Omaha did you experiment with PLO v FL or NL? How about 6max v FR? What did you play primarily in NLHE, 6max or FR? If you would, could you give reasons why you settled on the variation that you have?

I play 6max NLHE. I dabbled at FR, but it's incredibly boring to me, and I don't play well when I'm bored :D . I think my NLHE game is better suited to FR, I'm pretty tight for a 6max player (17/12), but I really don't like FR.

I'm going w PLO 6max for a couple of reasons. One is that, as w NLHE, I think 6max lends itself to learning more quickly. In FR, you can sit around waiting for the nuts alot of the time - but you can't at 6max, so you have to get good at reading villain types and situations more quickly. I also think it's easier to translate the 6max game to FR than the other way around. There's also the built in bias I have from NLHE, that I just don't like FR much. I could be wrong about the value of 6m, though, it's just my thought process.

I tried FL O Hi, but didn't enjoy it - but then again I don't really enjoy FLHE either, so it wasn't a surprise. I did enjoy FL O8, though - there's more strategy involved in trying to scoop and hand reading who's going hi/low/both, and found that alot of people in O8 don't have a clue about scooping/getting quartered/etc. I also enjoy PL08, more than I enjoy FL08, but I end up tilting when I get counterfeited on the river, which seems to happen very frequently in O8 games generally (O8 is rigged imo :D ).

I did find, though, that O8 and FL games are much lower variance than PLO Hi (Jeff Hwang makes the point that FLO8 is both profitable and relatively low variance). In the 45k hands of PLO I've played so far, I've already had 4 +/-10bi swings, so my graph looks like a heartbeat monitor for a heart attack victim being revived (fortunately, I'm winning, so it's all good), but my swings at O8 and FL are minimal.

Oddly, I find the swings at PLO much less tilt inducing than at NLHE. Since we're getting it in w small edges very frequently, and since the hands lend themselves to so many turns and rivers, I'm just happy when I get it in good regardless of outcome. In NLHE, I have a real "entitlement" problem - "Geez, my hand was 75/25, how could that %^$# suck out on the river like that!!!" - but I know that in PLO I'm going to lose a substantial number of all ins, so it doesn't bother me as much.

I'm still getting over my surprise, though, when I go back and review hands and find out I was much more of a dog than I thought I was when I got it in...

I love the compare/contrast approach with NLHE for someone trying to get his brain more in the proper frame for the Omaha.

I see alot of posters in multiple forum sites who are NLHE players trying out PLO, and quite a few of the vids I'm watching now are addressed specifically to this type of player. But I still haven't found a condensed written document addressing a structured approach to pf play for the converting NLHE player, beyond the very basic "hand chart" types of documents. Glad this made sense!
..
 
NineLions

NineLions

Advanced beginner
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Total posts
4,979
Chips
0
Yup, nice post Sly. I've donked around at PLO and you almost make me want to give it another go.
 
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
2
Great post. I might add something later but everything seems really accurate and true.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
I finally found a written summary document on PLO pf play for the NLHE player!

Well, sort of - it's a powerpoint in a DC vid, series Hellomaha, episode 2, really fantastic, watching it now...
 
bubbasbestbabe

bubbasbestbabe

Suckout Queen
Silver Level
Joined
May 22, 2005
Total posts
10,646
Awards
1
Chips
7
I'm just the opposite. I like the FR in O hi. It has taught me to be real patient. However those swings can be a real bitch. You have to have a strong heart for that.:p

What do you use for a HUD? I bought Holdem manager pro and I stilll can't get the bloody thing to work. I'm looking for another to try.

What stakes are you playing at? I find the micros really loose. I also like cap tables. More often than not you will get wider play at these tables because of the mental set of "Well it's only X amount I can lose here". But that X amount sure does add up when they lose it 5 or 6 times.:D

And when you are calling 3 bets, are these just str8 3 bets or pot size 3 bets? Big difference there.

I agree with completing the SB is a big leak. I have found that if you have limpers before you they will most times call a raise. You then have control of the flop play.

Have you ever played NLO?

And what about tournament play?

And lastly, Do you find that concentrating on PLO has made you a better or worse HE player?
 
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
2
I'll just answer your last question and let sly deal with the rest but PLO has definitely made me a worse NLHE player to the point that I do not play it anymore.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
I'm just the opposite. I like the FR in O hi. It has taught me to be real patient.

Sigh, this is why I suck at FR NLHE - I'm not very patient... :(

However those swings can be a real bitch. You have to have a strong heart for that.:p

What do you use for a HUD? I bought Holdem manager pro and I stilll can't get the bloody thing to work. I'm looking for another to try.

I just bought HEM small stakes a few weeks ago - it's been working great, but I admit to being too lazy so far to figure out how to reconfigure the HUD - it took me a long time to get good at it in PT3, not looking forward to the effort. I find it pretty straightforward, but I had a lot of practice from using PT3.

What stakes are you playing at?

I played 2plo and 5plo for a while to be able to see how hands hit flops, currently splitting time between 10plo and 25plo, hoping to be full time 25plo in February.

I find the micros really loose.

Completely agree, really really really really loose. Someone told everyone that hand values run close in PLO, and they forgot to tell everyone that position is important, so nobody folds pf... :D

I also like cap tables. More often than not you will get wider play at these tables because of the mental set of "Well it's only X amount I can lose here". But that X amount sure does add up when they lose it 5 or 6 times.:D

Sounds neat, I'll def try that sometime (though I primarily play PS)!

I'm under the impression from comments in forums that there isn't an equivalent to the NLHE professional shortstacker in PLO. I find that micro ss's are willing to get it in w some fairly marginal holdings pf (say AJTxss) and on the flop (any pair) - from an SPR standpoint, they're prob correct to do so - but just like your description of the cap tables, I'll see ss's give away 3 to 5 20bb bi's in a very short period of time.

And when you are calling 3 bets, are these just str8 3 bets or pot size 3 bets? Big difference there.

Definitely. Still getting a feel for it. I tend to call when the player's 3bet% is tiny and/or seems like a really bad postflop player regardless of 3bet size. Agg players (high 3bet%) frequently are 3betting smaller than pot for obv reasons, which seems inviting - but I don't like the way I'm playing these pots, I still have this thing about playing "fit or fold" from NLHE, and I'm not comfortable in 3bet pots w real heavy-duty aggs. I also get pretty selective against TAG's w around a 3-5% 3bet - I don't expect to get paid off as well by these guys, so whatever their 3bet size I want to make sure I have a hand that'll hit the flop well. But I'm generally tight in the first place, so I'm only folding around 15% of the time to any 3bet.

One thing the DC vid mentioned that I didn't think about before - most people play poorly in 3bet pots - this is also true in NLHE, and it's another reason to 3bet in both games. They didn't go into detail on what that poor play consists of, and I don't know anything about this in PLO beyond SPR play, prob my next project to go and figure this out. I found 3bet pots to be extremely profitable in NLHE - if it's as big an opportunity in PLO, it'll be worth the effort.

What guidelines do you use when facing 3bets, and potsized vs. 2-3x?

I agree with completing the SB is a big leak. I have found that if you have limpers before you they will most times call a raise. You then have control of the flop play.

Have you ever played NLO?

The idea terrifies me, no, haven't tried. I realize that in some ways NL makes things easier - but I'm imagining pf shoves every third orbit around the table and shuddering...

I've never played HU NLHE - always meant to try, never got around to it - once I feel much more comfortable (say 6 months from now) I intend to give HU PLO a try.

And what about tournament play?

:D Actually, yes, I've played around 15-20 inexpensive MTT's and a few SnG's, mostly on UB, for fun. And I did find it fun!!! I ft'd one MTT and won a couple of SnG's. I've also played a few PLO8 and HORSE MTT's - ft'd one PLO8.

I suck at MTT's (I'm not a good ss player, don't get it in when I should), though, these are definitely "change of pace" events for me even though I enjoy them.

And lastly, Do you find that concentrating on PLO has made you a better or worse HE player?

No question I'm a better HE player for the experience. I played a few sessions of NLHE a couple of weeks ago and felt much sharper in recognizing opportunities postflop than I had in the past, and in explicitly exploiting position than I had in the past.

But I did get passive in spots that I shouldn't have - in NLHE, you don't worry that Villain's holding the nuts as much as you have to worry about it in PLO, and I wasn't pushing hard enough in those spots.
..
 
bubbasbestbabe

bubbasbestbabe

Suckout Queen
Silver Level
Joined
May 22, 2005
Total posts
10,646
Awards
1
Chips
7
What guidelines do you use when facing 3bets, and potsized vs. 2-3x?

The famous "It depends":D

I've been playing a lot of the cap games lately. And I will usually push any 3bet to the cap if my hand is good pf. If playing a reg, PLO table I pot reraise most times. It just doesn't make too much sense to just call. You want control of the table. And at micros you will always get a caller. But then again, I am a very aggressive player.:D
 
bazerk

bazerk

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Total posts
1,091
Chips
0
Good thread slycbnew! I really like PLO but it doesn't always like me, I play HiLo though...it may not be the wisest decision because there are a # of agressive players in the freeroll & microstake tournaments trying to build up the pot for a Lo hand. I have found that playing Omaha has helped me to be more aware, overall, of potential dangereous board textures in my NLH games.
 
Weregoat

Weregoat

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Total posts
665
Chips
0
Very interesting read. Thanks for sharing, OP.
 
Top