MTT: how often do you have to cash to be profitable?

C

chattin35

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Total posts
73
Chips
0
In your individual past experience, roughly how often do you have to cash to be profitable in multi-table tournaments?

Running basic estimates myself... It seems like, if you go out soon after cashing, and the money on the bubble pays 2.5x's your buy in (typical numbers from what I've seen), you have to cash roughly 40% of the time you play just to break even. Is it realistic to think you can cash that often? Given that typical tournaments pay the top 10% it seems like the odds are not in your favor.

Of course, there will be times when you go deep into the tournament. My other questions is, in your experience, how often does this occur? How do you figure that into deciding whether or not to persue tournament play (ie: I need to make the final table in 1/15 tournaments to make it worth my time, etc)? What is your personal reasoning and break even point?

Anyway, just wanted to get the forum's thoughts and comments. Thanks.
 
Debi

Debi

Forum Admin
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Total posts
74,639
Awards
20
Chips
1,331
To be profitable at MTT's your goal would really have to be final tabling -not just cashing. And once you make that your goal you will find yourself cashing a lot less often. You have to have a big cash at least periodically to sustain.

It is not easy.
 
buckster436

buckster436

Cardschat Hall of Famer - RIP Buck
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Total posts
15,125
Awards
2
Chips
0
i figure it this way, if i play Ten $10. games, i have to cash once for at least $100. just to be even, anything above that is profit,, if you play 10 $50. games you have to cash at least once for $500. to break even, anything over that is profit, them are just examples, thats the way we figured it out 40 years ago, im sure there are newer ways to figure it out, im from the Old School, if you make a Penny, you made a profit,,buck:)
even that way, like daks said, its not easy,its a long battle,
 
ace2daface

ace2daface

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Total posts
663
Awards
1
Chips
0
dont forget to factor in rake, either Buck. :)
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Once. Cash in the 1st MTT you play and never play again. Easy game.
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

Fully Tilted
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
25,596
Awards
6
CA
Chips
968
You're estimates are off by quite a bit. In micro buyin levels, you'll typically see players cashing (I.T.M., 'in the money') at a higher frequency than in the larger buyin MTTs (I believe from many going by the theory... play to get ITM... then try to move up the money ladder... quite often we're then in bad shape and unless we get lucky once the bubble pops we usually don't run that deep in it).
Another note here... usually the payout for just making it ITM (just making it past when the bubble pops) is only around 1.5x your buyin (or even less). Try looking thru the lobbys of tournaments that have been completed and you'll see this to be the case.

The best online MTT players generally finish I.T.M. at a rate of 11-12% (this seems to be the average amongst the top guys who play online tournaments, with avg. buyin $100+... same goes for the med.-stakes buyin MTT players ($26-$75).. avg. ITM is ~11-12%). Players with higher I.T.M. usually don't have a higher ROI% (<< return on investment). ROI is the number you should actually be more concerned with.

So... what's a decent ROI%? It 'depends', lol. It depends on what your primary motivation for playing MTTs is, what buyins you're playing, etc. (ie. if you're playing for the highest winrate/hr. then you'd obviously need a decent ROI% if playing the micro levels, because there will be many times that you'll play for 4hrs. in a tournament and not make much more than your buyin in return).
Some good (high buyin) MTT players only have an ROI of +25% but at the same time they might play a very high volume of them. Others are +150%.

As mentioned above, you really want to shoot for the final table when playing MTTs. At first you might just want to play to get in the money which is fine but without a decent cash along they way it'll be difficult to maintain a bankroll, nevermind increasing it.
MTTs are a tough go... until you get a decent cash that is. This is why most MTT players suggest not playing an MTT that is more than 2% of your bankroll (many say only 1%).

I think if you just focus on improving your game along the way, gaining more experience all the time, play with good bankroll management, etc., the bankroll will take care of itself (in other words.... you don't need to calculate that you'd need to be cashing 40% of the time).

Sidenote.... for SNG play (single table SNG's that is)... 40% ITM is about what you'd need to be shooting for to be playign profitably. Anything below 35% ITM and I'm pretty sure you'd be running with a -ROI% (unless you had a disproportionately large number of 1st place finishes).

GL on the tables!!
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

Fully Tilted
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
25,596
Awards
6
CA
Chips
968
? Given that typical tournaments pay the top 10% it seems like the odds are not in your favor.

.

If you have an edge over the other players... the odds will be in your favour (over the longrun).
 
SilentJay

SilentJay

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Total posts
526
Chips
0
Absolutely positive I pay rake in every MTT I play in lol. :)

You pay a tourney fee every tourney, there's your rake

Pretty sure i pay rake (entree fee) in every MTT ive ever played in, mate.:rolleyes:
He was talking about "factoring in" the rake in the calculations. If he meant tournament fee, he would've said tournament fee. When you play a tourney, you know what you're paying from the start. There's nothing to "factor in" (unless you're a bit dense - in which case you probably shouldn't be playing at all.) If you pay 10 bucks and win 100, you've won 90. Pretty simple. But maybe there's actually rake on every hand in some tournaments these days or something. I haven't played much for the last 6 months. Who knows...
 
Debi

Debi

Forum Admin
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Total posts
74,639
Awards
20
Chips
1,331
Nah he meant rake and rake = tournament fee.
 
SilentJay

SilentJay

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Total posts
526
Chips
0
My bad. Sorry Ms. Knowwhatotherpeoplemeant. Now I remember why I haven't been here much anymore...
 
Dwilius

Dwilius

CardsChat Regular
Silver Level
Joined
May 5, 2008
Total posts
7,584
Awards
34
Chips
0
Seems you were the only one who didn't know what he meant, even though you claim to yourself "He was talking about "factoring in" the rake in the calculations. If he meant tournament fee, he would've said tournament fee."

Your interpretation assumes ace is completely ignorant to how tournaments function. Somehow I think referring to entry fee as rake (the houses cut) is more likely.

If you're too stubborn to interact with other people, then by all means don't come back at all.
 
SilentJay

SilentJay

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Total posts
526
Chips
0
Well, maybe most people do need to factor in these things. It's second nature to me. Didn't mean to offend anyone.
 
Debi

Debi

Forum Admin
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Total posts
74,639
Awards
20
Chips
1,331
My bad. Sorry Ms. Knowwhatotherpeoplemeant. Now I remember why I haven't been here much anymore...

Well, maybe most people do need to factor in these things. It's second nature to me. Didn't mean to offend anyone.

Well you failed miserably.

No need to get so upset because you misunderstood something. :eek:
 
J

j0sh1ngU

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Total posts
42
Chips
0
a lot of it depends on your style. Some are aggressive and either are big winners or losers. Others are conservative and just try to make cash. Be aware of what you are as it affects how often you must cash
 
FatBasset

FatBasset

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Total posts
365
Chips
0
I've frequently read the proposition that it is better to "play to win" the tournament rather than to "play to cash." In my opinion this is not a very useful simplification. You have to make it ITM before you can win the tourney. To win tournaments you have to be willing to take chances at some point and I think the difference in philosophy is when and to what degree do you start taking chances. Everyone has witnessed the maniac who builds a big stack early and is out of the tourney long before the money and most have probably seen a short stack catch a hot run of cards at the right time and win a tournament. With experience you'll learn your own style of patience and risk taking.
 
ace2daface

ace2daface

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Total posts
663
Awards
1
Chips
0
ok i ll clear this up

i actually meant tourney fee as it happens. i mainly play cash games so i used the term rake(mistakenly perhaps).

i suppose what i was trying to get at was that you're ROI must take account of the tourney fee(aka rake to me) before you determine profitability.

soz bout confusion:)
 
C

chattin35

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Total posts
73
Chips
0
Thanks for the reply Poker Orfice. Really good things to think about. Could you take it a step further and actively select tournaments with a greater potential to cash and/or they have individual sites promotions; bounties, gaurentees, etc. which could potentially increase your own overall ROI?

How do you select the tournaments that you play in? ROI perspective? win-rate/hr perspective? And why?
 
W

WurlyQ

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Total posts
760
Chips
0
If you are learning to play the game, all the winrate stuff is secondary to improving your game. If your goal is to make immediate profits, your bottom line is $/hr.

In terms of game selection, bankroll management, effective buy in compared to your actual buy in (overlays, money added, etc), and your edge against the field are the factors to be considered. Note that tournaments generally have the highest ROI potential but that comes at the cost of variance and a lot of time invested. Bounties reduce variance because the final prize distribution isn't as skewed as normal tournaments.

As has been stated, the money to be made is at the top couple of spots in large MTTs and your goal from the outset should be to make a few large cashes as opposed to lots of small ones. This results in larger variance but it is widely accepted as the optimal way to maximize ROI.
 
LuckyChippy

LuckyChippy

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Total posts
4,987
Chips
0
You only need to cash once. It just has to be a big one.
 
liv3player

liv3player

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Total posts
136
Chips
0
NAil on the head

I've frequently read the proposition that it is better to "play to win" the tournament rather than to "play to cash." In my opinion this is not a very useful simplification. You have to make it ITM before you can win the tourney. To win tournaments you have to be willing to take chances at some point and I think the difference in philosophy is when and to what degree do you start taking chances. Everyone has witnessed the maniac who builds a big stack early and is out of the tourney long before the money and most have probably seen a short stack catch a hot run of cards at the right time and win a tournament. With experience you'll learn your own style of patience and risk taking.
I think this about sums it up.After playing you will decide when to start taking these chances to win the tournament and when folding is also key to potentially winning.Many times after the bubbled has popped and I';m sitting with a relatively small stack say 9k with blinds at 1200 and pick up a PP such as 99 but see an allin from early position called by another early position player and fold this because I am almost surely beat and would need to hit a 9.Folding is also a big key to winning sometimes people forget this.Needless to say I pick up something like AK/AQ a few hands later and double up where as if i called with my 99 i would have had a chance to triple up but ultimately lost and folding was the right play.Since i doubled up a few hands later.
 
the lab man

the lab man

CardsChat Irregular
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Total posts
3,557
Awards
1
Chips
1
ok i ll clear this up

i actually meant tourney fee as it happens. i mainly play cash games so i used the term rake(mistakenly perhaps).

i suppose what i was trying to get at was that you're ROI must take account of the tourney fee(aka rake to me) before you determine profitability.

soz bout confusion:)

Ace Generally the lowest payouts in most Mtts will cover the tourney fee.
Hence your ROI will be low if you to continue just to make the money.
You do need to final table at lower levels to improve ROI
 
Real Money Poker - Real Money Casinos
Top