R
R1ace
Enthusiast
Silver Level
I think this is an over-generalization. It's personal / situational, with various possible reasons not to. For instance, the more tables you play, the more ABC your game has to be since you have less time to read opponents as much or as well. This doesn't do much to help prepare you for the times you move up to a new level and find you need to adapt your thinking, your reading and your game because the opponents' tendencies and patterns differ more often from those you're used to.If you are a winning player, then there is no reason not to add more tables if you can handle it.
They say if you are a beginner and trying to truly learn about the game, it is best to focus on a single table, and focus on player tendencies, how people play, etc. Obviously you will play more hands if you play at 6 tables, but you will be oblivious to some of the learning points that are happening while you aren't paying attention.
imo a beginner should stick to 2 tables. Jumping ahead & playing more tables if anything will just stunt your growth as a player (in initial stages) imo.Currently i play 6 tables and sometimes tend to loosen up for 1 or 2 hands. Im sure if i played more tables i would be able to fold more hands as I would have more action. Is it good for a beginner to play around 10+ tables? or should I stick to 6 for now?