Money management in poker, plain and simple from Mike Caro

kidkvno1

kidkvno1

Sarah's Pet
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Total posts
16,281
Awards
4
Chips
50
http://www.poker1.com/archives/12630/
You’re all grown up now, and it’s up to you to determine how much risk you’re willing to take in gambling and in life. Players ask me frequently about the secrets to money management. What they crave is some mystical formula that will keep them safe and defend against pain. Alas, there aren’t any.

The bigger risks you take, the more likely you are to find yourself suddenly wealthy and the more likely you are to go broke in the process. As poker Hall-of-Famer and 10-time world champion Doyle Brunson and I explained in a course we filmed last month for iAmplify.com: If you want more certainty of getting rich eventually, but not right away, you should be cautious with your bankroll. Here’s a tease from that Brunson-Caro course…

The course

There are mathematically solid methods for managing your poker bankroll. The so-called Kelly Criterion is one. It prevents destruction of your bankroll by requiring smaller and smaller wagering, when funds shrink. And it allows larger and larger wagering as your bankroll grows. This assumes you can find games small enough when a meager bankroll is in jeopardy.

Application of this Criterion to poker is problematic, because a poker game isn’t just one wager, but a complex series of interwoven wagers. You can decide the size of the game you’ll enter, but not the size or number of wagers you’ll need to make during the course of that game. For that reason, the Kelly Criterion is somewhat impractical for poker.

Also, there’s no real reason to protect a small bankroll indefinitely. If you lose it, you’ll probably find a way to gather another small bankroll from the real world.

The list

Here’s a short list of tips that will help you manage your poker bankroll…

Choose a number of minimum buy-ins to play at your beginning level.
Make sure the number of minimum buy-ins increases as you move up the ladder.
Choose a game you qualify for with the highest profit per hour.
Leave games when you don’t know why you’re losing.

First, let’s say the minimum buy-in for a $2/$4 fixed-limit game is $20. Assume you’ve decided that 10 minimum buy-ins is required to get started at this first level. That’s $200.

With just 10 buy-ins, you have a strong chance of going broke, because luck plays a big part in poker in the short term. But you figure you can get another $200 and try again later if you fail. Now here’s the trick that will gradually reduce your chances of going broke as you build your bankroll.

It’s point number two. Make sure the number of minimum buy-ins increases as you move up the ladder. For simplicity, we’ll assume the minimum buy-in required is always proportional to the size of the game.

This means that if you set a requirement for yourself of at least 10 minimum buy-ins to play $2/$4, then you should increase that to, say, 12 when you jump up to $3/$6. So, instead of your bankroll staying proportional — $200 to play $2/$4 and $300 to play $3/$6, you now require $360 to play $3/$6.

Doyle and I recommend that you continually increase your required number of minimum buy-ins as you move up levels, so that if you’re playing $200/$400, you need, say, 50 minimum $2,000 buy-ins — or $100,000. If you do it that way, the bigger your bankroll grows, the more protection you provide it.

Chances enhanced

And if you lose and no longer have the required number of minimum buy-ins to sit at that previous level, move down until you earn enough to move up again. Do it that way and money management becomes simple, and your chances of lifelong success are greatly enhanced.

Number three reminds us that we don’t always have to play for the highest stakes that we qualify for. Choose a game you qualify for with the highest profit per hour. If there’s a more profitable, smaller game, sit there.

And number four says to leave games when you don’t know why you’re losing. That’s very important. It’s okay to stay in a game if you know you’ve been unlucky so far, and the conditions are good enough that you expect to earn a decent profit from now on. But sometimes you’re bewildered by your losses, and you can’t explain them. Maybe the game isn’t as good as you assumed. Whatever the reason, if you don’t know why you’re losing, you’ll do your bankroll a favor by simply quitting.

If you have the skills to win and always play according to this list, you’ll have an excellent chance of building and maintaining a significant poker bankroll. — MC

Would you tell this to someone new to poker or not??
I see it being ok for a skilled player, but not to someone starting out. Whats your thoughts on it.
I hope it was ok to post this in Learning poker.
 
Worak

Worak

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Oct 25, 2008
Total posts
6,024
Chips
0
I think that 50 buy-ins is too little but I'm a BR nit - and haven't made the hall of fame yet ;) .
 
Colbefc

Colbefc

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Total posts
2,656
Awards
2
Chips
524
I agree with Stefan but like him I am a BR nit, I always like to have 100 buy ins for cash games and playing normally I have never gone broke sticking to this, some players will say this is way too tight but it works for me, alart from when I have played way above my BR when drunk it works 100% :D
 
L

luckyhearts

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Total posts
299
Chips
0
Interesting...yes I think that is prolly better suited to the experienced player.
A more simple rule that I try to stick to, is:
Never risk more than 10% of your bankroll....in theory you will never go broke-though obviously eventually you could get into stakes lower than available. Then its back to freerolling.
 
Colbefc

Colbefc

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Total posts
2,656
Awards
2
Chips
524
I think 10% is way way too much to risk but as you say every player has their own way of BR management and as long as it works for you.
 
OMGITSOVER9K

OMGITSOVER9K

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Total posts
2,994
Chips
0
for fixed limit or no limit?

because Caro's talking about fixed limit and there's a BIG difference.

25 buyins is average, I'm not so much of a nit but I generally use about 30 - 40 BI for NLHE.

for a newbie though since they'll make more mistakes etc give them a cushion.. 40BI should be ok, enough time for them to learn and stuff before they go broke..
 
MediaBLITZ

MediaBLITZ

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 29, 2011
Total posts
2,206
Chips
0
Actual numbers aside - the principles and concept should absolutely be shared with any new player you care about.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
It's important to reinforce what MediaBlitz said, that the underlying principles- are more important than the actual numbers, assuming the latter are within reason of course. If you play a high-variance style or high-variance games, you should set your buyin guidelines higher than if you aren't subject to such swings.

There's also the matter of emotional comfort. I'm pretty conservative in my BRM. In my case, the main reason isn't about the percentage of my roll in play, but about the number of dollars. And my comfort level isn't always the same, so depending on my mood at any given time, I may play at any of several different levels.
 
Real Money Poker - Real Money Casinos
Top