Mass Multi Table or Higher stakes??

F

Fanch

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Total posts
191
Chips
0
**Opinion Poll: Just wondering what your all's thoughts are on this: should I play fewer mtts and ring tables with higher stakes , or more with lower stakes. I feel like as a PLO/PLO8 player, it's to my advantage to play fewer, higher stakes tables, which the Ferguson rules allow. However, a lot of sources indicate a better learning/mastering experience playing multimass tables of lower stakes. In his book Treat Yout Poker like a Business, Dusty Schmidt advocates playing only 1% per table, but playing as many tables as possible. However, this seems a bit tough given the current online situation in the US, especially for a non hold em player. PLEASE share your thoughts!!!
 
sam1chips

sam1chips

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Total posts
800
Chips
0
I found for myself (playing Holdem cash games, for what it's worth) that it was easier for me to multi table lower stakes than single table a higher stakes game. I get to play much more hands/hr, and am only risking a smaller % of my bankroll in any given hand.

It all comes down to personal preference though, in my opinion. If they're both under good bankroll management then do what you want!
 
Top