D
Deedoox
Rising Star
Bronze Level
Hey!
I'm a physics student and I see poker in a more mathematical way than the average. I guess it is only about 50% math and 50% anything else. I mean I see it in a way that usually you have to estimate first the opponent ranges (which is usually not math) and then calculate some probability etc.
But what do you think which game type (cash game or tournament) fits the most for a less intuitive and more scientific playstyle?
I read that in cash games the only downswing come from long run good decisions which was unlucky at the moment (assuming that you are a decent player).
Why doesn't fit this on tournaments? You make a good decision going all in with strong cards against a loose opponent but he gets lucky and wins 70-30 for instance and you are out. But if you play a lot of tournament and do the same good decisions, will you get the same results from that as the cash games?
Somebody said you can play tournaments intuitively with profit but you can't play cash games with the same results.
I'm a physics student and I see poker in a more mathematical way than the average. I guess it is only about 50% math and 50% anything else. I mean I see it in a way that usually you have to estimate first the opponent ranges (which is usually not math) and then calculate some probability etc.
But what do you think which game type (cash game or tournament) fits the most for a less intuitive and more scientific playstyle?
I read that in cash games the only downswing come from long run good decisions which was unlucky at the moment (assuming that you are a decent player).
Why doesn't fit this on tournaments? You make a good decision going all in with strong cards against a loose opponent but he gets lucky and wins 70-30 for instance and you are out. But if you play a lot of tournament and do the same good decisions, will you get the same results from that as the cash games?
Somebody said you can play tournaments intuitively with profit but you can't play cash games with the same results.