Warrior1961
Legend
Bronze Level
Hi everyone.
I am by nature and perhaps by my age (58), quite conservative when it comes to poker.
I do not know if that is right or wrong but being like this allowed me in other times not to lose roulette and even get a few dollars (in fact we are, with an old friend spinner, putting together something to return, but that is not the subject of this forum and I will not debate about it).
Basically I play freerolls and sit and go nanolimits (cash still scares me and I play it very little).
My type of management is hyper conservative. For example to play sit and go of a table I have to have 200 buy in.
Another thing I do is if I play a sit and go of 0.20 +0.02 and lose it, it automatically goes down to recover 0.22 lost and 0.11 more.
This type of management I bring from my origins of roulette and my approach (for myself obviously, I do not pretend nor I am able to teach absolutely anything about poker) is that if with a management similar to this I could survive for quite some time and win a few dollars in a game of negative mathematical expectation such as roulette, maybe in poker it would give me good results, beyond the obvious differences between both games.
Well, I hope my newbie idea is understood.
Thanks for always being there.
Best regards from Buenos Aires.
I am by nature and perhaps by my age (58), quite conservative when it comes to poker.
I do not know if that is right or wrong but being like this allowed me in other times not to lose roulette and even get a few dollars (in fact we are, with an old friend spinner, putting together something to return, but that is not the subject of this forum and I will not debate about it).
Basically I play freerolls and sit and go nanolimits (cash still scares me and I play it very little).
My type of management is hyper conservative. For example to play sit and go of a table I have to have 200 buy in.
Another thing I do is if I play a sit and go of 0.20 +0.02 and lose it, it automatically goes down to recover 0.22 lost and 0.11 more.
This type of management I bring from my origins of roulette and my approach (for myself obviously, I do not pretend nor I am able to teach absolutely anything about poker) is that if with a management similar to this I could survive for quite some time and win a few dollars in a game of negative mathematical expectation such as roulette, maybe in poker it would give me good results, beyond the obvious differences between both games.
Well, I hope my newbie idea is understood.
Thanks for always being there.
Best regards from Buenos Aires.
