How to play poker

D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
The topic title isn't me asking how to play.. I'm actually going to take some time and explain a few things even though with american thanksgiving I should really be on the tables right now. There's been a few questions and more than a few opinions about this and that and w/e on this board and well maybe I can clear some things up. What comes to mind at least.

About this whether or not to vary your raise size stuff, the answer is yes of course. No one size will be best for every situation you're in. You might want to vary a bit depending on position, effective stacks, who's in the blinds, who you expect to go to a flop with you, etc etc not to mention your own vpip. For instance you obv want to 3bet smaller vs short stackers (and by short stackers I do ~not~ mean monotabling fish who're playing short). You'll want to 3ball larger (and adjust your range) against weak/passive players you have position on who won't fold or 4bet because they want to see if they hit 2p+. If you're stealing from the BTN with a 3.5× open (perhaps against against nitty rakeback warriors to your left who keep the fold to any bet box checked) when 2.5 has every bit the success % then make the adjustment. None of this has anything to do with your hand so you're not giving away your cards, but hey, you can even vary your sizing based on that too until you think you might start being exploited for it.

One of the things I try to hammer home to a number of ssnl players is to focus maybe a little less on trying to play an unexploitable style and more on exploiting the players you're playing against (which obv you have to play in a potentially exploitable manner to do). This kind of shift in mindset can do wonders for one's win rate. You would not believe how many times I've seen people justify terrible calls for balance reasons or because they'd otherwise be folding too much in that spot or w/e yet they're up against someone who is just never ever bluffing there and/or it's just a really uncommon situation to begin with. I snap folded QQ earlier today to a check/raise on a QTTT6 board because there was no chance villain was bluffing. Another player was in the pot so I saw his JT at showdown but I didn't need a showdown to feel good about the fold. Exploitable to fold the 2nd nuts to a check/raise? Sure. Is this guy going to start check/raise bluffing rivers a lot against me on ABBBC boards because I folded 2 unknown cards the only other time he did it? Not likely lol.

To the guy getting owned by 2NL, much better to start off playing too tight and then loosening up after getting a feel for the game than to start off playing too loose. Regarding the question about basing your bet size on your perceived equity, the answer is no. Sizing is based on a number of things but I guess the response I'll go with is your opponents' ranges for calling/raising etc and how they change in relation to the size of your bet.

Play chip poker will help you if you're unable to consistently beat those games. If you can, then no, not really.

For LB's topic about playing too tight at a live table, playing the mentioned A5s and K5s is not guaranteed to lose you a ton of money necessarily. The worse your competition is (especially in the relatively passive dynamic of a typical 1/2 live table where the players suck albino buffalo **** for the most part) the more hands you can profitably play. That said I'm pretty sure LB is no expert so I'll reiterate what I just said above that playing a bit too tight is better than playing too loose in games like these. At least until you know what you're doing. If you're going to try and see more flops (which in itself isn't a bad idea), whether it's by limping behind in late position or via isolation raises/squeezes, then try to pick hands that play well in pots that have the number of players you expect to see and try not to overplay hands that make top pair no kicker when there's 5 other people in the hand heh. Stack depth is also pretty key in deciding which hands to play and when, as it tends to vary greatly by player as you go around the table.

What else. There's a topic I didn't click on asking if pros are easier to play against than donkeys or w/e. Yes of course they are. That's why they're pros. The higher stakes you play, the more your opponents will respect your raises. Avoiding tables with bad players will do wonders for your win rate.

3betting/4betting: Because many uNL players play poorly in 3bet pots, it's a huge edge to understand when and why to build the pot pre. There's that bugs article that I think is a couple of years old now which should help a lot in building some (more or less) unexploitable ranges for preflop betting wars. Handy stuff if you feel you're getting abused or if you're just really bad in 3bet pots. Cold 4bet bluffing is starting to become a little bit more of a thing these days but it's still pretty rare at 50NL/25NL or thereabouts. It can be remarkably effective not just because players usually have a monster when they do it but because a lot of players now are 3betting/squeezing pretty wide ranges especially in certain preflop situations but their range for getting it in is still quite tight. I would go as far as to say that many regs at these limits do not have a 5bet bluffing range whatsoever. Anyway make sure f3bet is on your HUD if it isn't already. It's remarkable how high it is for some.

BvB stuff: A number of people are getting lost in blind vs blind situations based on some of the topics here. In 100NL and 200NL games a lot of players open from the sb way too often - or rather they would be if these same players didn't also fold vs sb opens way too often. Flat calling from the bb is always an attractive idea because position in poker is pretty awesome and most players are pretty bad post flop (particularly in comparison to their preflop game). Why do I write post flop as 2 words and preflop as one? wtf. You have to love those players with a giant grand canyon-esque chasm between their 1 and 2 barrel frequencies eh. 3betting vs the sb also fun and lucrative whether or not they try flatting oop with whatever junk they were trying to steal with (they pretty much won't). Good regs will 4bet bluff in this spot though at a frequency at can be pretty tough to abuse sometimes (the 3bet does unfortunately partially mitigate your positional advantage) so know your opponent obv and allow your HUD to benefit you.

Opening from the sb at around the same frequency you do from cutoff is pretty normally. You'll do it more against some players and less against others ofc. If you're the big blind and sb likes to try and limp a lot in unopened pots (completing with some hands in opened pots isn't actually terrible and can be a cheap way for nits to inflate their stats) then take a second to have a good laugh and then make sure you're raising a wide range. That's an automatic raise against most of the fish who try it.

For how to play pocket pairs, it's the same as any other hand. You're playing range against range, and if you can win a pot without a showdown you're generally best off doing just that. A lot of people flat 3bets with them hoping to spike a set otf when they really don't have the implied odds to do so. Try not to do that. Note with with implied odds, villain's range and their play is just as great a factor than any so called rule in regard to effective stack depth. You can also be ~too~ deep to set mine in the strictest sense of the term with baby pairs. Quad mine maybe.

A great villain profile to set mine against would be something akin to that guy in cash game hand analysis lamenting how his AA is always getting stacked by hands like T7. He probably only 4bets premium pairs (poker is tough when your opponents can reliably put you on a super narrow range), plays oop with them super deep when he probably isn't very good with deep stack play, and repeatedly gets in his entire stack as a massive dog (think Clifford) or drawing dead entirely. Be more inclined to set mine against players who are bad at poker. They're more liable to pay you either by by overvaluing a hand, bluffing off their chips drawing slim to none, or just making all kinds of mistakes trying to play post.

In 6max cash play opening every pair from UTG isn't terrible. In FR however you might want to open fold 22 to say 55 from EP. Depends on the table.
 
R

rumsey182

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Total posts
432
Chips
0
only thing i would add is learning unexploitable play or at least the mechanics of it does help a lot in forcing you to learn equitys and be able to help beginning players get a feel for what is and isn't +EV
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
You should absolutely strive to understand it (even though it doesn't actually exist but that's another topic). You need to be able to recognize when other players as well as yourself deviate from it, and it's also great to fall back on when you're playing skilled or unknown players. Equity and expected value is sort of a different thing.
 
JaxA

JaxA

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 10, 2013
Total posts
316
Chips
0
Excellent post, thank you so much. I'll have to reread sometime to digest more of the advice.
 
R

rumsey182

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Total posts
432
Chips
0
You should absolutely strive to understand it (even though it doesn't actually exist but that's another topic). You need to be able to recognize when other players as well as yourself deviate from it, and it's also great to fall back on when you're playing skilled or unknown players. Equity and expected value is sort of a different thing.
uhm don't know what you mean there has to exist a Nash equilibrium ( at least one possibly many possibly infinite)
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
A nash equilibrium does not equate to unexploitable when it comes to multiway play. Still, if you can show me a nash equilibruim for 6 or 9 handed NLH 100 blinds deep, I'd love to see it lol.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
What else. There's a topic I didn't click on asking if pros are easier to play against than donkeys or w/e. Yes of course they are. That's why they're pros. The higher stakes you play, the more your opponents will respect your raises. Avoiding tables with bad players will do wonders for your win rate.
Opponents will respect your raises more after you've shown that you raise a range they should respect. It's not automatic. Indeed, quite a few regs, when they see a new player, will give him less respect than they give to other regs who have earned said respect.

Also, respect doesn't mean they'll lay down for you. Better players have more plays in their arsenals. So as just one example, micro-players pretty much never check-raise bluff the river. This doesn't happen all that often at high levels either, but it does happen much more in a relative sense because many more players are capable of this play, which means they'll do it sometimes vs basically never for micro-players. You'll also face more floats, more raising with draws, etc.

Avoiding tables with bad players will decrease your win rate. You win the most money at poker from players who aren't as good as you are. The broader the skill gap, the greater your EV. Sure, they'll suck out on you more, but overall, they'll also give back more through the poor and mediocre plays they make.

This doesn't mean you should be willing to sit with players who are better than you because there are a couple of fish. But if you can hold your own against the better players at a given table, you definitely want some fish there too.
 
R

rumsey182

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Total posts
432
Chips
0
A nash equilibrium does not equate to unexploitable when it comes to multiway play. Still, if you can show me a nash equilibruim for 6 or 9 handed NLH 100 blinds deep, I'd love to see it lol.
as long as it is a none cooperative game a nash equilibrium exists, the problem is the math gets insane when you add multiple people in the pot

i don't think we have that figured out or solved but not being able to compute the variables let doesn't mean it doesn't exist

it exists for push fold charts the thing is once we hit enough people and enough BB's to make many options possible it becomes too messy to calculate
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
Opponents will respect your raises more after you've shown that you raise a range they should respect. It's not automatic. Indeed, quite a few regs, when they see a new player, will give him less respect than they give to other regs who have earned said respect.

Also, respect doesn't mean they'll lay down for you. Better players have more plays in their arsenals. So as just one example, micro-players pretty much never check-raise bluff the river. This doesn't happen all that often at high levels either, but it does happen much more in a relative sense because many more players are capable of this play, which means they'll do it sometimes vs basically never for micro-players. You'll also face more floats, more raising with draws, etc.

Avoiding tables with bad players will decrease your win rate. You win the most money at poker from players who aren't as good as you are. The broader the skill gap, the greater your EV. Sure, they'll suck out on you more, but overall, they'll also give back more through the poor and mediocre plays they make.

This doesn't mean you should be willing to sit with players who are better than you because there are a couple of fish. But if you can hold your own against the better players at a given table, you definitely want some fish there too.

Preposterous. Bad players are easily the most dangerous poker players to go up against thanks to their unpredictable nature and reluctance to fold when they're supposed to. Even if it's true they check/raise bluff the river less often they have a whole slew of plays you'll see ~more~ often... like the patented preflop limp double check snap min raise coupled with the the 2bb river bet. You just never know if they're trying to block a shove or induce one. For this reason I usually recommend less experienced players start out at the higher limits against more straightforward opponents and eventually work their way down into the tougher games full of bad players when they're ready to.
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
as long as it is a none cooperative game a nash equilibrium exists, the problem is the math gets insane when you add multiple people in the pot

Cooperative play doesn't have to be deliberate... a pair or set of mutually beneficial strategies can obv be wholly incidental. You're arguing with me from a theoretical perspective but it's kind of missing the point. In return for the very basic lesson on game theory you're trying to give me I suppose I could get into why looking for nash equilibria in multiway NLH is overvalued (by some) but I'd rather do it via PM. Feel free to shoot me one if that interests you.

i don't think we have that figured out or solved

Your guess is correct - in fact we're not even remotely close. It might never be entirely solved.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
Preposterous. Bad players are easily the most dangerous poker players to go up against thanks to their unpredictable nature and reluctance to fold when they're supposed to. Even if it's true they check/raise bluff the river less often they have a whole slew of plays you'll see ~more~ often... like the patented preflop limp double check snap min raise coupled with the the 2bb river bet. You just never know if they're trying to block a shove or induce one. For this reason I usually recommend less experienced players start out at the higher limits against more straightforward opponents and eventually work their way down into the tougher games full of bad players when they're ready to.
Are you being a sarcastic troll, or do you actually believe what you've said?

If the latter, can you point out where any recognized experts have agreed with you?
 
W

WizardRubic

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Total posts
125
Awards
1
Chips
0
reluctance to fold when they're supposed to.

I think this makes bad players exploitable. Just bet a ton when you have it and check it down when you don't. Chances are they'll pay since they won't fold to your bets when you've got it.

As for the limp then 2bb bet on the river, it's probably best to solely limp in with hands like a-x suited, suited connectors, and small pocket pairs against the bad players. Raise the premiums, fold out the rest. Play the limped hands fit or fold. If you limped with speculative hands and hit a speculative holding, and encounter the 2 bb on the river thing, I'm not sure about, but I'd look at how often the villain is doing it and with what kind of hands and make my decision from there.
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
Are you being a sarcastic troll, or do you actually believe what you've said?

If the latter, can you point out where any recognized experts have agreed with you?

I can point out where recognized fish have not agreed with me. That's almost the same thing right. Rest assured that many very good mid stakes players would fully support the concept of more novices learning the ropes and cutting their teeth on the same tables these veteran grinders earn their income off of.

I would never use anyone's reputation or results (be it my own or anyone else's) to justify or discredit any advice when it comes to poker. I much prefer to use logic and reason, and I'd also hope that nobody here blindly does something at the tables or makes changes to their play/stakes without a clear understanding as to exactly why they're doing it. No one will ever succeed at this game simply by following directions because that's not how poker works. There's a plethora of bad advice on poker forums and this board in particular but's that's fine as long as it provokes thinking or even discussion on strategy and theory (even on a fundamental level as that's often the most important).
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
I can point out where recognized fish have not agreed with me. That's almost the same thing right.
It's nowhere close to the same. You can find examples of fish who say a whole lot of things. Including some who have agreed with you.

Rest assured that many very good mid stakes players would fully support the concept of more novices learning the ropes and cutting their teeth on the same tables these veteran grinders earn their income off of.{
Feel free to point out where these many have actually agreed with you.

And again, it seems curious that I don't recall even a single instance where an expert player has stated what you believe to be sound advice.

I would never use anyone's reputation or results (be it my own or anyone else's) to justify or discredit any advice when it comes to poker.
You just did. You used some fish having said something opposite to what you believe to justify your position.

I much prefer to use logic and reason, and I'd also hope that nobody here blindly does something at the tables or makes changes to their play/stakes without a clear understanding as to exactly why they're doing it. No one will ever succeed at this game simply by following directions because that's not how poker works.
This is a straw man. I did not suggest playing blindly or following directions in a formulaic manner is good poker.
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
lol. Hello again.

You can find examples of fish who say a whole lot of things.

Oh totally. Experts too ofc, but certainly fish as well. Might take them a couple of days when the conversation had already run its course and you legit think the topic is over with, but yeah.

You just did. You used some fish having said something opposite to what you believe to justify your position.

Nah you're just really, really confused right now. You asked me a question and that's about as far as I was willing to go to humour you. Actually that's not necessarily true... maybe I'll bring in a poker expert here to support my side of this intriguing debate using the power of science/maths. We'll see how far you want to go with this though before I call in Dr. Pokerpwnage.

Play whatever stakes you want dude. It's no skin off my back.
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
Yeah np. Any specific questions just post here or PM and I'll see whether or not I can help at all.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
Oh totally. Experts too ofc, but certainly fish as well.
If your advice is so sound, shouldn't it be easy to show everyone where multiple experts have suggested it? Indeed, shouldn't it be their consensus view?

Nah you're just really, really confused right now. You asked me a question and that's about as far as I was willing to go to humour you. Actually that's not necessarily true... maybe I'll bring in a poker expert here to support my side of this intriguing debate using the power of science/maths. We'll see how far you want to go with this though before I call in Dr. Pokerpwnage.
By all means, please show me why I should change my thinking. I'll be grateful since it will help me improve. So far however, I've seen basically nothing that supports your opinion, and thus have no reason to re-think.
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
By all means, please show me why I should change my thinking. I'll be grateful since it will help me improve. So far however, I've seen basically nothing that supports your opinion, and thus have no reason to re-think.

If you are serious about improving then my suggestion is to move way up heh and play some actual half way decent poker players. I would even volunteer for that because that's how nice I am. It stands to reason that better competition will help you become a better player, and I mean it worked for Blom right. If you decide not to do this because I didn't round up multiple poker experts for you or w/e (like how many others do you even need) then cool fine I don't care do what you will enjoy your life good luck godspeed shuffle those pennies back and forth etc etc. I probably shouldn't link to other forums and well being CC there's a paucity of sorts when it comes to people possessing profuse powers of potent poker prominence. You're just going to have to use your own brain on this one. ;)
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
If you are serious about improving then my suggestion is to move way up heh and play some actual half way decent poker players. I would even volunteer for that because that's how nice I am.
It would be nice of you to point me toward some recognized players who support what you put forward as solid advice. Doing so would also give you at least a shade more credibility.

It stands to reason that better competition will help you become a better player, and I mean it worked for Blom right.
Anecdotal "evidence" that can be an outlier is not proof.

If you decide not to do this because I didn't round up multiple poker experts for you or w/e (like how many others do you even need) then cool fine I don't care do what you will enjoy your life good luck godspeed shuffle those pennies back and forth etc etc.
You rounded up a grand total of zero.

As for denigrating me and my opinion by suggesting I only play for pennies at levels below where you play, what does that have to do with how valid my point of view is? Do you even what levels I play? What if I actually play higher than you? Would that mean your opinion is invalid?

I probably shouldn't link to other forums and well being CC there's a paucity of sorts when it comes to people possessing profuse powers of potent poker prominence. You're just going to have to use your own brain on this one. ;)
My brain tells me that since you won't provide anything from credible sources to support your point of view, the most likely reason is that a paucity if not a total absence of recognized players who agree with you.
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
You rounded up a grand total of zero.

Others as is other than me, since I would certainly count as one... relatively speaking. Knowing you you're going to try and cast doubt on my credentials so let's just clear that up right now and inform you that I have played in the very highest stakes games Zynga offers. I am a rank champion based on the experience points I've accumulated there and my profile is decorated with almost every Zynga achievement you can obtain. I've won 10 hands in a row without folding anything in between. I've gone from 0 to 750,000,000 play chips in a single session. So yeah, I mean this in the humblest way possible ofc but I'm kind of a big deal.

If this debate is to be decided on the number of "poker experts" vouching for each side's position (which, again, is a stupid way to go about this) then I'm afraid you're losing by a score of 1-0.

As for denigrating me and my opinion by suggesting I only play for pennies at levels below where you play, what does that have to do with how valid my point of view is?

About as much as the experts you need from me to validate mine lol.

Do you even what levels I play?

I even. Such is the power of the internet.

What if I actually play higher than you?

Unless I'm playing freerolls that are somehow even more free than the ones you invest your time into, I'm going to remain skeptical that this is in fact the case.

My brain tells me that since you won't provide anything from credible sources to support your point of view, the most likely reason is that a paucity if not a total absence of recognized players who agree with you.

Rest assured that many very good mid stakes players would fully support the concept of more novices learning the ropes and cutting their teeth on the same tables these veteran grinders earn their income off of. You've been doing this for the better part of a week now but it's going to click for you soon. I know it will. You don't need a team of experts assembled to spell it out for you either. You think you do but you really don't.

Are you in Mississauga? Or am I wrong. Great city. Pretty nice poker scene as well.
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
Others as is other than me, since I would certainly count as one... relatively speaking. Knowing you you're going to try and cast doubt on my credentials so let's just clear that up right now and inform you that I have played in the very highest stakes games Zynga offers. I am a rank champion based on the experience points I've accumulated there and my profile is decorated with almost every Zynga achievement you can obtain. I've won 10 hands in a row without folding anything in between. I've gone from 0 to 750,000,000 play chips in a single session. So yeah, I mean this in the humblest way possible ofc but I'm kind of a big deal.

If this debate is to be decided on the number of "poker experts" vouching for each side's position (which, again, is a stupid way to go about this) then I'm afraid you're losing by a score of 1-0.
It's not a contest. All I'm asking is for you to show me evidence to support your position. One way to do this would be to point out where recognized players have agreed with you.

I find counting yourself as a poker expert, with or without the quotation marks, does absolutely nothing to support your position.

I'm willing to be convinced. I'm here to learn, which includes changing my opinions. But insisting you're right because you think so gives me no reason to re-think.
 
DaReKa

DaReKa

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Total posts
264
Chips
0
DunningKruger said:
Rest assured that many very good mid stakes players would fully support the concept of more novices learning the ropes and cutting their teeth on the same tables these veteran grinders earn their income off of.
Read this and think about it carefully, Arjonius.

I'm starting to wonder if this is some elaborate anti-troll..
 
Jblocher1

Jblocher1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Total posts
2,645
Chips
0
Sounds to me dunning like you would love to see really crummy players at your higher stakes tables so you can make some extra money lol.

Dude give it up.... We can all tell ur totally full of crap. Your a solid player and you would never EVER consider winning on Zynga an achievement. I commend you on ur epic trolling sir, but I think it's time for u to "kick in your cards" and admit to the forum that what your saying is only backed by full time grinders who want the worst players possible at their tables
 
D

DunningKruger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Total posts
1,030
Chips
0
Oh they're achievements alright. At least try it yourself before you belittle them. It's not as easy as you might expect.
 
Top