how to play pocket aces when....

blikbleek

blikbleek

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Total posts
127
Chips
0
how would you play pocket aces when you raise 5x BB and you get like 5 or 6 callers?

should i fold to any reraise?
should i reraise an initial raiser?
when is it time to fold?
 
P

ph0n3_j4ck

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Total posts
222
Chips
0
Usually people don't call a raise that is that big pre-flop.
I'd say you should reraise anyone that tries to reraise you pre-flop.
As for reraising an initial raiser, it depends. Is the reraiser an aggressor? Can you make anymore money off of him?
It's time to fold when you see a scary board. Usually any pair on the board should scare you if there are too many players in the pot. However if you eliminate the players down, you should have the best hand.
 
taaron

taaron

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Total posts
716
Chips
0

+1 more information needed please. . .and lol

Usually people don't call a raise that is that big pre-flop.
I'd say you should reraise anyone that tries to reraise you pre-flop.
As for reraising an initial raiser, it depends. Is the reraiser an aggressor? Can you make anymore money off of him?
It's time to fold when you see a scary board. Usually any pair on the board should scare you if there are too many players in the pot. However if you eliminate the players down, you should have the best hand.
^lol. . .care to elaborate???
 
bgomez89

bgomez89

Resident Thugmaster
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Total posts
3,127
Chips
0
Do you mean postflop or pre?
 
Cafeman

Cafeman

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Total posts
3,200
Chips
0
how would you play pocket aces when you raise 5x BB and you get like 5 or 6 callers?
Look to your left. Look to your right. Put on your shades. Shove it over on those bitches and watch them crumble.
 
pcgnome

pcgnome

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Total posts
2,054
Awards
1
Chips
9
Where are you seated at the table?
How many BB's do you have?
How many BB's do the caller's have?
etc. not enough info really... but what i would probably do is re-raise, call any 4-bet, and wait for the flop. If another ace shows up, then I would go all in.
 
mrmonkey

mrmonkey

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Total posts
680
Chips
0
Look to your left. Look to your right. Put on your shades. Shove it over on those bitches and watch them crumble.

I think he means postflop though. It's ambiguous the way it's worded, but if they're all just calling his raise then I'm guessing a flop is on its way.

In which case, playing your aces postflop in a 6-way pot will depend a lot on:

* The board texture
* The table dynamics
* Your position
* Your opponents

Pre-flop though, AA is always an insta-shove no matter how many others are in the hand with you.
 
pcgnome

pcgnome

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Total posts
2,054
Awards
1
Chips
9
Pre-flop though, AA is always an insta-shove no matter how many others are in the hand with you.
Don't insta-shove pre-flop in early position. All you'll usually get is the BBs & the SBs, because everybody will know that you have a monster.
 
mrmonkey

mrmonkey

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Total posts
680
Chips
0
I meant if facing action or resistance, it's an insta-shove... obviously you don't want to shove as your first act unless for some reason you expect to get some calls that way.
 
pcgnome

pcgnome

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Total posts
2,054
Awards
1
Chips
9
Here is an example of what I'm talking about...

Everleaf Gaming Game #326361546
Tournament #1797525
***** Hand history for game #326361546 *****
Blinds 200/400 NL Hold'em - 2011/11/14 - 04:23:37
Table 2
Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players: 7
Seat 1: promason ( 20641 Chips )
Seat 2: Xgnomrcyx ( 29474 Chips )
Seat 3: GabeKaplan ( 19710 Chips )
Seat 4: crushed ( 14968 Chips )
Seat 5: rofo ( 12874 Chips )
Seat 6: luckylucy21 ( 18625 Chips )
Seat 8: Covington ( 18660 Chips )
promason: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
Xgnomrcyx: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
GabeKaplan: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
crushed: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
rofo: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
luckylucy21: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
Covington: posts ante [ 50 Chips]
Xgnomrcyx: posts small blind [ 200 Chips]
GabeKaplan: posts big blind [ 400 Chips]
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Xgnomrcyx [ Ad, Ac ]:ad4: :ac4:
crushed folds
rofo folds
luckylucy21 folds
Covington raises [ 1,066 Chips]
promason folds
Xgnomrcyx raises [ 3,748 Chips]
GabeKaplan calls [ 3,548 Chips]
Covington folds
** Dealing Flop ** [ Ah, Qc, 3s ]:ah4: :qc4: :3s4:
Xgnomrcyx checks
GabeKaplan checks
** Dealing Turn ** [ 8s ]:8s4:
Xgnomrcyx checks
GabeKaplan checks
** Dealing River ** [ 8h ]:8h4:
Xgnomrcyx: bets [ 3,200 Chips]
GabeKaplan calls [ 3,200 Chips]
Xgnomrcyx shows [ Ad, Ac ] a full house, aces full of eights
GabeKaplan does not show cards [ 9s, 9h ]:9s4: :9h4:
Xgnomrcyx wins 15712 chips from main pot with a full house, aces full of eights [ Ad, Ac, Ah, 8s, 8h ] :ad4: :as4: :ah4: :8s4: :8h4:

Was I not right to check until the river? I might have bet more. I dunno.
If I were in his spot I would have folded pocket 9's w/ 2 overcards on the board after the flop tho. In the end he came in 4th, and I came in 2nd.
 
Last edited:
mrmonkey

mrmonkey

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Total posts
680
Chips
0
I'm not really sure what you are trying to illustrate with the hand you posted.

In any case, some thoughts on your hand:

1. It's a tourney, the original post and the game is talking about cash ring

2. Your preflop raise size looks good

3. The flop check is probably fine given the texture of the board, especially if villain is prone to cbetting or aggression -- but I'm most definitely leading the turn with a 3/4 pot bet

4. As played, I'm betting the river hard, probably pot-size or maybe just shoving... If villain is bad enough to call off 20% of his stack in this spot with middle pair, he's probably bad enough to also call off his whole stack with it as well.

5. You are too focused on results. Even your signature, if not sarcastic, shows how results-oriented you are being.
 
blikbleek

blikbleek

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Total posts
127
Chips
0
heres how the hand went from what i remember:
$.2-$.4 cent NL cash

im second to act i raise to .20
a few folds and 5 callers (there was 9 players)
about 2 callers have me covered the rest have about equal stack

flop comes 5-6-7 rainbow
i raise like 1/2 pot, and now i got a little more than half my stack in
all fold and 1 guy shoves. i knew right there some donk hit 2 pair and possibly a straight, but i got equity now, so i call

villain turns over 3-4s (clubs), which made me want to vomit that someone played this, and that what was likely the worst hand ended up winning
 
pcgnome

pcgnome

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Total posts
2,054
Awards
1
Chips
9
I thought this thread was kind-of useless without somebody posting a hand.
I am still wondering how anybody could possibly be stupid enough to call a 3/4 pot bet on the turn w/2 over-cards already on the board. That could be a leak.
What do you specifically mean by "results oriented"?
BTW my signature is just a joke
 
pcgnome

pcgnome

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Total posts
2,054
Awards
1
Chips
9
heres how the hand went from what i remember:
$.2-$.4 cent NL cash

im second to act i raise to .20
a few folds and 5 callers (there was 9 players)
about 2 callers have me covered the rest have about equal stack

flop comes 5-6-7 rainbow
i raise like 1/2 pot, and now i got a little more than half my stack in
all fold and 1 guy shoves. i knew right there some donk hit 2 pair and possibly a straight, but i got equity now, so i call

villain turns over 3-4s (clubs), which made me want to vomit that someone played this, and that what was likely the worst hand ended up winning

I know that it's hard to fold pocket aces, but there were at least 9 hands that could beat you after the flop. Don't be a calling station.
 
taaron

taaron

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Total posts
716
Chips
0
heres how the hand went from what i remember:
$.2-$.4 cent NL cash

im second to act i raise to .20
a few folds and 5 callers (there was 9 players)
about 2 callers have me covered the rest have about equal stack

flop comes 5-6-7 rainbow
i raise like 1/2 pot, and now i got a little more than half my stack in
all fold and 1 guy shoves. i knew right there some donk hit 2 pair and possibly a straight, but i got equity now, so i call

villain turns over 3-4s (clubs), which made me want to vomit that someone played this, and that what was likely the worst hand ended up winning

I understand having pp's cracked, but have no knowledge of whether or not the villain is a bad player, I do know that this is merging range, and can be super profitable in the right spots, like here.
I'm not saying that calling a x5bb raise w/ low SC's was solid, but it worked, alot of the best players know to play merged hands facing a decent preflop raise (5xbb), because based on a particular ppl's table image a 5xbb raise is usually a very strong hand and often JJ+>
a merged hand allows someone to out flop PP's a good percentage of the time, if not its a very easy fold decision, flop or turn.

make a note that: villain plays low SC's, and will call strong preflop rasies. alot to learn imo from the frustrating beats. . .all the best!
 
KerouacsDog

KerouacsDog

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Total posts
9,410
Chips
0
heres how the hand went from what i remember:
$.2-$.4 cent NL cash

im second to act i raise to .20
a few folds and 5 callers (there was 9 players)
about 2 callers have me covered the rest have about equal stack

flop comes 5-6-7 rainbow
i raise like 1/2 pot, and now i got a little more than half my stack in
all fold and 1 guy shoves. i knew right there some donk hit 2 pair and possibly a straight, but i got equity now, so i call

villain turns over 3-4s (clubs), which made me want to vomit that someone played this, and that what was likely the worst hand ended up winning
I play 34s if Im last to act after that action, and I feel like gambling. if i hit the flop hard I win, if i dont I fold. if someone has 89 so be it. first time ive seen this thread.
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

Fully Tilted
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
25,599
Awards
6
CA
Chips
968
I understand having pp's cracked, but have no knowledge of whether or not the villain is a bad player, I do know that this is merging range, and can be super profitable in the right spots, like here.
I'm not saying that calling a x5bb raise w/ low SC's was solid, but it worked, alot of the best players know to play merged hands facing a decent preflop raise (5xbb), because based on a particular ppl's table image a 5xbb raise is usually a very strong hand and often JJ+>
a merged hand allows someone to out flop PP's a good percentage of the time, if not its a very easy fold decision, flop or turn.

make a note that: villain plays low SC's, and will call strong preflop rasies. alot to learn imo from the frustrating beats. . .all the best!
Yah wtg man. You're eatin' into my bottomline here ^ . You keep tellin' 'em the right stuff is costing me my 'smokes money' :mad:
 
B

baudib1

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Total posts
6,635
Chips
0
How is it that you have half your stack in with a 1/2 pot bet on the flop?

765 I would just b/f or c/f.
 
T

Trimming1

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Total posts
417
Chips
0
Too small of a raise..

heres how the hand went from what i remember:
$.2-$.4 cent NL cash

im second to act i raise to .20
a few folds and 5 callers (there was 9 players)
about 2 callers have me covered the rest have about equal stack

flop comes 5-6-7 rainbow
i raise like 1/2 pot, and now i got a little more than half my stack in
all fold and 1 guy shoves. i knew right there some donk hit 2 pair and possibly a straight, but i got equity now, so i call

villain turns over 3-4s (clubs), which made me want to vomit that someone played this, and that what was likely the worst hand ended up winning
I would have raised to like .35cents to keep an idiot like that from wanting to call. He probably was third or fourth to act and had implied odds to see the flop. We all have made decisions at one point or another based on implied odds; That was a straight gamble on his part but the pot odds at four or five to one gives him the technical "right price " to see the flop. Hell I once called a pre-flop raise when I was in the big blind with 7 2 suited because 6 ppl were already in the pot at a ten person table. LOL flopped two pair and turned a boat... I was extremly lucky in that senerio, but my point is that you need to make them pay DEARLY to draw.
 
taaron

taaron

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Total posts
716
Chips
0
I would have raised to like .35cents to keep an idiot like that from wanting to call. He probably was third or fourth to act and had implied odds to see the flop. We all have made decisions at one point or another based on implied odds; That was a straight gamble on his part but the pot odds at four or five to one gives him the technical "right price " to see the flop. Hell I once called a pre-flop raise when I was in the big blind with 7 2 suited because 6 ppl were already in the pot at a ten person table. LOL flopped two pair and turned a boat... I was extremly lucky in that senerio, but my point is that you need to make them pay DEARLY to draw.
Implied odds are sooooo super sick, but.. . . . .

There are a couple reasons why your logic is a slight bit flawed;
1.) you want lesser hands to call, merging is not idiotic though (not always anyway).
2.) when the flop is super draw heavy you have to be ready and willing to fold and wait for a better spot EVEN with PP :ac4: 's

a little bit more to think about:

Board: 7c 6d 5h
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 32.038% 31.59% 00.45% 11256 161.30 { AcAd }
Hand 1: 17.238% 14.99% 02.24% 5343 799.97 { random }
Hand 2: 16.954% 14.77% 02.19% 5263 778.97 { random }
Hand 3: 16.933% 14.60% 02.34% 5202 832.30 { random }
Hand 4: 16.838% 14.58% 02.25% 5197 803.47 { random }


sorry PO, I'll reduce quality posts by at least 20% from now on;)
 
Last edited:
mrmonkey

mrmonkey

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Total posts
680
Chips
0
How is it that you have half your stack in with a 1/2 pot bet on the flop?

With 5 callers to his 5xbb raise the pot on the flop is going to be pretty big. I'm probably just shoving this flop in this spot and hoping to get called by top/middle pair, overpairs, or straight draws.
 
mrmonkey

mrmonkey

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Total posts
680
Chips
0
I am still wondering how anybody could possibly be stupid enough to call a 3/4 pot bet on the turn w/2 over-cards already on the board. That could be a leak.
What do you specifically mean by "results oriented"?

What you just posted was very results oriented. You didn't know that villain was holding 99 until after the hand played out. Assume that villain's hand is hidden. What could he have that he might call a 3/4 pot bet on the turn with?

* He may have paired his ace: AK,AJ,AT
* He may have two clubs: tons of combos
* Some really bad villains might call with KJ or KQ/JQ-type hands
* He may have two pair or smaller sets: AQ,A8,A3,QQ,33,88 (he would probably raise your turn bet here then and you can then get stacks in)

By betting the turn, you maximize value from the hand if he is holding one of those hands, and can probably then get stacks in on the river easily if he is holding top pair. You also avoid giving him a free draw if he's holding two spades or KJ. If he's not holding one of the above hands, then you'd be hard pressed to get value out of any sort of river bet... like you said, most opponents would probably fold 99 to any sort of river bet on that board.
 
Top