To be honest, I wish MrGoodFlop is a bit more explicit with his definition of his tight range.
I think other poster's suggestions about
bluffing are fantastic and IMO is the way to go--but I will elaborate more on the bluffing part.
First of all, I give you some kudos that you did self-assessment about your ability and react to it by playing tight. However, I'm worried there is a chance that you're so into "I am a weak player, therefore I should play a very tight range" narrative that you're losing self-confidence. If that's the case, us telling you to start bluffing is probably easier said than done for you.
If that's the case, you need to start honing your bluffing skill--on play money game. Pick a single table sit n go at a regular speed that has somewhat moderate cost and play it. I personally think that 50 000 play chips regular speed Sit N Go at
pokerstars are suitable because it seems the players are not too lotto. I don't know about Full Tilt so you will have to do some research.
When you play in the game, play with your normal very tight range. My normal 50 000 play chips table usually have some loose player that will not realize my very tight range--but other players usually will and these players are the one who is going to make it deep into the game.
You should reach a point in the game where the blind is high, you still have a decent stack, but even you know that everybody left is exploiting your tightness. At this point, you start implementing advice from everybody here.
Here's an example idea of bluffing.
- One person has min-raised before the action is folded to you in the Big Blond. Flat call regardless of your hand--assuming the person who min-raised is not a tight player as well. If the flop has a single ace or a single king, bet appropriately even if your hand doesn't connect with the board. Your opponent will be thinking, "Oh no. MrGoodFlop has a good hand, that's why he called out of position. The flop must have connected with his card. I better fold."If he still calls your hand, then you know that player genuinely have a monster.
- UncleConRon brought a fantastic idea about "If you roll a 30, play loose." My personal rule is "If I am dealt 23o or 24o, play loose." Sometimes I can go as far as three-betting with those card from the blinds. The reason why you want to do either of this suggestion is when your hand is really-really bad, you will stop thinking "Am I winning this hand?' and more to "Has the opponent called my bluff yet?" and "Does my opponent have a hand too strong that I can't bluff it away?"
Given you are capable of self-reflection, I wouldn't be surprised that you would pick up those "bluffing instinct" rather quickly and start exploiting people back with your tight background.
I understand why you want to play tight--if you think you're not really strong, you will make errors, thus to reduce those errors, you play less hand by playing very tight--but IMHO, to learn how to recognize when to bluff, you gotta make some errors. Which is why the best place to learn those error is at play money table where there is a minimum consequence.
Although I will make one comment: I am not convinced that showing your bluff when you win is a good idea. If you think you are a weak player, then it's probably not in your interest to show that you are capable of bluffing. I personally prefer to win a lot of small pots and convince my opponent that I am on a good run.