Do you really think a VPIP of 27 (or similar) is loose?

T

texasfoldem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Total posts
102
Chips
0
I have a tendency to find that my VPIP does go somewhat close to the 30% mark on occasions. Generally speaking it is below that though (possibly more like 24-26). I noticed that my overall VPIP after 10s of thousands of hands is still 27% but it is going down over time now, bit by bit, as I gain more experience. For example, I tend to fold most Ace and low cards that are off-suit especially if I am not in late position.

When you look at the hands for 27% VPIP, that player is not really playing rubbish hands pre-flop. It means they are playing certain speculative hands that somewhat tighter players would probably fold in certain positions like, for example, 22 UTG. It does not necessarily mean that the player is going to bet on rubbish. If you do play more speculative hands it does indeed mean you have to fold more hands when the table cards are useless.

I personally consider 27% VPIP quite tight. What do you think about this?
 
gupiel0k69

gupiel0k69

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Total posts
186
Awards
1
PL
Chips
29
Vpip doesn't tell the whole story, i mean it doesn't tell you how loose the player is playing from all of the positions. You can be opening like 50% from the button and play pretty tight from other positions and still have the same Vpip as player who opens mediocre hands from all of the positions. That's why i like have positional Vpip stats. On 6-max 27 vpip is like standard, on FR it's on the looser side imo.
 
T

texasfoldem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Total posts
102
Chips
0
Vpip doesn't tell the whole story, i mean it doesn't tell you how loose the player is playing from all of the positions. You can be opening like 50% from the button and play pretty tight from other positions and still have the same Vpip as player who opens mediocre hands from all of the positions. That's why i like have positional Vpip stats. On 6-max 27 vpip is like standard, on FR it's on the looser side imo.


OK, good point. I forgot to mention this is 6 max
 
D

DS3

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Sep 9, 2019
Total posts
7,490
Awards
1
GB
Chips
204
A VPIP rate is dependent on what a player feels comfortable with looked at from one perspective- by definition a looser player will play more hands.

But a VPIP rate of 27% is generally regarded as statistically on the loose side (even for 6 max) which sort of takes 'opinion' out of the picture.
 
T

texasfoldem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Total posts
102
Chips
0
A VPIP rate is dependent on what a player feels comfortable with looked at from one perspective- by definition a looser player will play more hands.

But a VPIP rate of 27% is generally regarded as statistically on the loose side (even for 6 max) which sort of takes 'opinion' out of the picture.


If you look at the hands that make up that extra 6% above optimum, the player is still playing good hands. They are possibly playing hands that are not so good out of position. However, as long as they are folding the more speculative hands if they know they have nothing much, then they are not much different than someone at 21%.

Take for example playing low pockets in early positions. If you don't hit a set on the flop then it is best to fold to most betting. Another thing is if the betting gets too furious pre-flop then those not so good hands will just get folded.

I have reduced my VPIP now to closer to 21%... I have however had an absolutely tragic 2 or 3 days though. I do not know what on earth has happened but I am losing massively. It is soul destroying because I have been grinding my way up for weeks with consistent wins. All of a sudden every second hand is a flush or straight. All my sets lose to complete newbies. I am getting to the point where if I see 3 of the same suit on the table it automatically means my VPIP 100 opponent has a flush without fail!! The river card is also plain evil... always the river card playing against me...
 
D

DS3

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Sep 9, 2019
Total posts
7,490
Awards
1
GB
Chips
204
If you look at the hands that make up that extra 6% above optimum, the player is still playing good hands. They are possibly playing hands that are not so good out of position. However, as long as they are folding the more speculative hands if they know they have nothing much, then they are not much different than someone at 21%.

Take for example playing low pockets in early positions. If you don't hit a set on the flop then it is best to fold to most betting. Another thing is if the betting gets too furious pre-flop then those not so good hands will just get folded.

I have reduced my VPIP now to closer to 21%... I have however had an absolutely tragic 2 or 3 days though. I do not know what on earth has happened but I am losing massively. It is soul destroying because I have been grinding my way up for weeks with consistent wins. All of a sudden every second hand is a flush or straight. All my sets lose to complete newbies. I am getting to the point where if I see 3 of the same suit on the table it automatically means my VPIP 100 opponent has a flush without fail!! The river card is also plain evil... always the river card playing against me...

Interesting post texasfoldem.

I agree there are valid reasons to play at a higher rate (than say 21% to follow your guide). I am a TAG player by nature but am happy to see my VPIP increase, however, as you note, it's normally because I have received a nice run of cards. I never raise it by design.

That said, do you think intentionally lowering your VPIP had anything to do with the recent run bad or not? I am just coming off a similar run myself...a little light at the end of a very frustrating tunnel.
 
ChickenArise

ChickenArise

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Feb 24, 2018
Total posts
2,089
Awards
1
Chips
34
Its not tight but its not loose, especially in 6max. Even in full ring I am cautious about labeling some one loose until they get in the high 40's or above. A good run of cards can and will happen. Be careful out there.
 
Evan Jarvis

Evan Jarvis

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Total posts
2,014
Awards
4
Chips
1
I have a tendency to find that my VPIP does go somewhat close to the 30% mark on occasions. Generally speaking it is below that though (possibly more like 24-26). I noticed that my overall VPIP after 10s of thousands of hands is still 27% but it is going down over time now, bit by bit, as I gain more experience. For example, I tend to fold most Ace and low cards that are off-suit especially if I am not in late position.

When you look at the hands for 27% VPIP, that player is not really playing rubbish hands pre-flop. It means they are playing certain speculative hands that somewhat tighter players would probably fold in certain positions like, for example, 22 UTG. It does not necessarily mean that the player is going to bet on rubbish. If you do play more speculative hands it does indeed mean you have to fold more hands when the table cards are useless.

I personally consider 27% VPIP quite tight. What do you think about this?


If you play 27% of hands from all positions the issue is that you are going to get 3-bet a lot potentially and get flatted in position by many hands that dominate you.

Playing this kind of range in late position where you will likely have position for the remainder of the hand is totally fine, but the thing is if you are opening 27% into 4 or 5 players odds are someone has been dealt a better hand than you

what's the best hand on average on a 5 handed table? top 20%, and 6 handed? 16.7%
So to avoid playing at a disadvantage out of the gate it helps to respect the charts.

On a table where everyone just calls and you get to control all bet sizes vs passive players, sure, play all your suited aces, suited kings, pairs, suited connectors and gappers all that it's fine.

If you play amazing postflop and your opponents make many mistakes you want to be seeing as many flops as possible. But in games where other players play well too I think respecting that and not getting too out of line is best.

That being said many players win with 27% VPIP, but calling that tight and wanting to go way beyond that in 6-max means you will need some very solid reads on your opponents.

Sounds like if someone can pull it off it's you though!
And playing loose definitely forces us to learn postflop very well which is a great bonus!
 
T

texasfoldem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Total posts
102
Chips
0
If you play 27% of hands from all positions the issue is that you are going to get 3-bet a lot potentially and get flatted in position by many hands that dominate you.

Playing this kind of range in late position where you will likely have position for the remainder of the hand is totally fine, but the thing is if you are opening 27% into 4 or 5 players odds are someone has been dealt a better hand than you

what's the best hand on average on a 5 handed table? top 20%, and 6 handed? 16.7%
So to avoid playing at a disadvantage out of the gate it helps to respect the charts.

On a table where everyone just calls and you get to control all bet sizes vs passive players, sure, play all your suited aces, suited kings, pairs, suited connectors and gappers all that it's fine.

If you play amazing postflop and your opponents make many mistakes you want to be seeing as many flops as possible. But in games where other players play well too I think respecting that and not getting too out of line is best.

That being said many players win with 27% VPIP, but calling that tight and wanting to go way beyond that in 6-max means you will need some very solid reads on your opponents.

Sounds like if someone can pull it off it's you though!
And playing loose definitely forces us to learn postflop very well which is a great bonus!


OK, thanks for all that. A lot to think about.

I am finding ways now to really reduce the amount of hands I play now. I am really scrutinizing the hole cards that I have been playing now. It think it may improve things slightly, but as the saying goes: "every little helps" (which Tesco supermarket probably borrowed from somewhere). That saying still counts though.

I have been trying more and more recently to comprehend exactly how important position is. I did at some point think it was maybe overstated. I reminds me of "location location location!" when it comes to buying a house. When it comes down to it, though, would you pay a lot of money for a rusty old shed in a small plot in the middle of Beverly Hills just because that "accommodation" is in Beverly Hills? I kind of got to the thinking that, in reality, position is a bonus, but the hand (hole cards in this case) itself is the most important detail.

I should, for example, probably consider folding more low pockets under the gun or in the blinds.
 
Top