Do you make note people based on first...

Do you make note people based on first of his/her action? (except folds)or how many actions need you to be make note to him?

Usually add a note tag to players I have over 100 hands tracked on.

I also make a note if I see a rediculous play or someone I feel is competent. I usually sharkscope my table if I have the time but generally go on HUD stats.

depends on the player. For some, I post a note after a few hands. But it also happens that I change notes about players periodically from tournament to tournament. In games for money, I rarely meet the same players, so there I have few people who have notes on what to expect.

no, on the first actions I don't do a note, but if I notice that something repeats, then I mark. in general I try not to be fond of marks, it seems to me can only prevent in a further game.

I make notes when the player repeats a few times, or if I notice his mistakes ....

The notes I make I typically based on their levels of aggression. If it is a significant hand I will also note it.

I make notes on the players - if one action or error is repeated 3 or more times.

Never judge a book by its cover or certain pages as the story can change rapidly from chapter to chapter the notes you have on a player 6 or 7 months ago may not be useful in todays games good luck

It depends on the play. There are certainly odd things that I have seen that I will mark down or if I see something done consistently I will mark it. When I see the notes later I will try to verify that information is correct before I let it impact my decisions too much.

I note if the bet large pre-flop, then I choose another table if I am at a cash game.

You can tell who's aggro and who's calling stationny pretty quickly. Just pay attention to each session though. At micros players usually don't adjust at the same sitting.

At micro levels fold equity is low so you wanna pick and choose your spots to be aggressive.

I tag everyone who I see open limp for a second time as a fish. I give them the benefit of the doubt the first time.

I take notes whenever somthing that I find, well, noteworthy, happens. For me this includes donk bets with made hand, donk bet with a draw, slowplaying weak made hands, etc.

I take notes very rarely, mostly when a player gets to my table very often!

When I didn't use the software and had no idea about the ranges of hands, I made a lot of notes. It was information about the hand, action and position. Each new line looked like this: AA Raise MP. Now I make notes only about specific things. For example, the draw of pocket pairs.

Hey. You should always take notes at any limit. There are 2 types of notes - authentic and probabilistic. If your opponent made a continued bet 3 times in a row, then most likely he is bluffing. If your opponent calls your bet 3 times in a row with a terrible hand, then he is definitely a bad player. I hope you understand my idea.

It is very difficult for me to write something down from some player, only if I remember him and perceive his mistakes over time.

I rarely note players,only if they do something extremly bad or extremly good,i note really agressive and really tight players too

Just one chance, the first time they do something to annoy me they get the 'idiot ring' color.

I consistently add to each player notes every time I am at the table with them.
I will then tag them based off of how consistent their player notes are.
If I have a lot of data on a user, I will take their notes into consideration.

I dont write their hands,i just remember their name and i remember if they play agressive,retarded or deffensive.

I make a note as soon as I see something noteworthy. I play a lot of Zoom poker (1,000 or so players at a time, all bouncing from table to table every hand), so if I don't make the note right away I'll quickly forget who it was and what he did. Later on I may change the note if I see things that are different from what my original note suggested.

I make notes to have a clearer picture of an opponent. In certain situations it can give me an advantage or to protect me from a dangerous opponent. First, I make a basic division into aggressive and passive players, and then I enter into personal characteristics.

Whenever I do the nuts, I record all the observations in order. So it's much easier to navigate then. Sometimes the first impression is deceptive.