At what point is it safe to consider yourself a winning player?

N

nugganootch

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Total posts
29
Chips
0
I've been beating 5NL for about 7ptbb/hr for the last 12000 hands (before that I didn't use poker tracker but have played for about 3 years on and off).

I know this is a small sample and I'd need 100000 or more to really know that I'm winning but how likely is it that this is just a lucky streak? I feel like I'm playing well, I usually get my money in when I'm ahead and I'm getting better at controling tilt. Do you think it's safe to assume I'm a winning player and move up when my roll allows it or would you stay at 5NL until I have more hands under my belt?

Any advice from you guys who have been through this would be much appreciated
 
benevg

benevg

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2007
Total posts
1,267
Chips
0
I've been beating 5NL for about 7ptbb/hr for the last 12000 hands (before that I didn't use poker tracker but have played for about 3 years on and off).

I know this is a small sample and I'd need 100000 or more to really know that I'm winning but how likely is it that this is just a lucky streak? I feel like I'm playing well, I usually get my money in when I'm ahead and I'm getting better at controling tilt. Do you think it's safe to assume I'm a winning player and move up when my roll allows it or would you stay at 5NL until I have more hands under my belt?

Any advice from you guys who have been through this would be much appreciated
i always figured 5NL is a bad place to be. how much is the max buy-in for this level on FT? on Stars, it is 10 bucks, and it seems much more meaningful to be at 10NL with this buy-in.

generally, if you are bankrolled for a higher level and if you think you can handle it, i say go for it, don't wait. you may already be playing at a level that is enough to beat the higher stakes, so why waste the time at 5NL?

although, you do have to watch yourself for a while after moving up, to make sure you are still winning and not tilting or playing scared because of the bigger bets. good luck!
 
BelgoSuisse

BelgoSuisse

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Total posts
9,218
Chips
0
the correct answer is: never. the games keep changing you so while you might be a winner today, you might become yourself a loser tomorrow.

on the other hand, 12k hands is not a bad sample for micro-stakes. btw, what is your ptbb/100? It's more informative than ptbb/hr.

if you can find the standard deviation in PT3, you can play with [old link ~tb] to figure out more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
O

only_bridge

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Total posts
1,805
Chips
0
I've been beating 5NL for about 7ptbb/hr for the last 12000 hands (before that I didn't use poker tracker but have played for about 3 years on and off).

I know this is a small sample and I'd need 100000 or more to really know that I'm winning but how likely is it that this is just a lucky streak? I feel like I'm playing well, I usually get my money in when I'm ahead and I'm getting better at controling tilt. Do you think it's safe to assume I'm a winning player and move up when my roll allows it or would you stay at 5NL until I have more hands under my belt?

Any advice from you guys who have been through this would be much appreciated
Did you play full ring or 6-handed?
How about your profit per 100 hands?
Most winning players dont stay as long as you have at 2nl, so there is very little information about what a good profit at this level is, but I think you are ready to move up to 5nl (given you have the bankroll for it).
 
Caseace48

Caseace48

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Total posts
196
Chips
0
There is no need to be overly cautious with micro limits IMO, once you hit 20-25 BI's if your winning for 4 or 5bb/100 then you'd definitely want to move up and not waste anymore time. Once you hit 25NL and up, then it is a little more important to have 30-40 BI's and have a solid win rate over a 40-50k hand sample. Of course this is just my comfort level, and to be honest the decision comes down to your comfort level. Comfort often dictates confidence and confidence is going to affect your overall play tremendously.
 
N

nugganootch

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Total posts
29
Chips
0
I think my BB/100 is 4 point something. I'm not on my laptop today so I'll have to check tomorrow. I play full ring, my style is probably too tight for 6 max.

Thanks for the advice guys, I think I'm going to take a shot when my role allows it, I can always move back down. I'm still plugging some holes in my play from the blinds so staying at this level a little while longer won't hurt, for some reason the blinds are the only positions I actually lose money from. I guess it's because I open up my range too much and don't fold easily enough when I half hit the board. I'm working on it though
 
Arjonius

Arjonius

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Total posts
3,167
Chips
0
There's no universal definition for what it takes to be a winning player, although obviously, you have to be ahead. That said, how much ahead and over how long a period and/or how many hands are pretty subjective. Plus you can be a winning player despite having gone broke multiple times.
 
Mase31683

Mase31683

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Total posts
1,474
Awards
1
Chips
1
I've got a spreadsheet that does variance calcs.

At 12,000 hands, and a 7ptbb/100 winrate, a 95% confidence interval puts your "actual" winnings at +/- 10.73 ptbb/100.

So you're true winrate would be between -3.7 and 17.7 ptbb/100.

If you maintained this winrate, right around 30k hands you could say you are in fact a profitable player, with an "actual" winrate of .21-13.7ptbb/100

Otherwise, for 12k hands, you must be winning at 11ptbb/100, at which point your true winrate range is .26-21.7ptbb/100
 
Mase31683

Mase31683

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Total posts
1,474
Awards
1
Chips
1
I just realized I ran those numbers and they're no good. I need to enter the standard deviation, and I left it at what it was for a HU player.

Depending on your SD, it could already be that you are likely a winning player. I would say based on what I've seen of play at those limits, that if you feel like you're better than the competition, and you're also getting money in well, then you likely are in fact a winning player there.
 
Safe Poker Sites
Top