Having the best hand the other opponent chooses to fold would this be considered bluffing or just the opponent recognizing they were beat then fold the worst hand? I cannot claim a bluff if in-fact I just had the best and the opponent folded unless I know they folded the best hand instead at some point in time?
The opponent folds the best hand by knowing they had the best but conditions surrounding the moment then a movement of a bet from their opponent now brings conditions surrounding them to think instead of knowing their moment? By how the value is understood from both you and your opponents perspective, the movements up to this point of the moment a fragment of the truth from not knowing the absolute.
This movement brings into existence a light of the truth of what to bet, and then from this does this process appear from knowing players abilities in advance prior to this moment? Knowing this more than just a way to bluff or is this just a moment of knowing more than our opponent from the opponent defining their moment of what is false about their play within the moment to allow for a counter move?
This from what we know thus, moving the opponent one level below to becoming the thinker instead of the knower that allows for us to make a movement that the opponent now will fold the best hand by what we know because of what they think, thus, the fold of the best hand? Perhaps this is the definition of what was false of their play rather than giving an explanation of how to bluff?
Perhaps it is our game that is just being ethical about our reads to counter the movement of the thinker instead because our game knows more than that of our opponent’s in this exact moment, perhaps from prior moments of these similar situations? Is a bluff just a movement instead? From the “self” recognizing itself in another?
A mistake in another that we have made ourselves prior to this moment that we know after failing first and now read in our opponent within this moment second that brings into existence the moment of actuality third? The definition of change that just a moment before was a nothing until we made a movement from thinking in the moment then making a movement into the existence of knowing for the first time? An actual small increment of change within our game a ah ha moment?
A pure movement of knowing; from the concept of knowing? How would I recognize how to do this if I was not part of the moment that has folded the best hand prior to knowing because of being an existence of the thinker in these, similar situations prior to knowing? Then working on what is false about my game within these moments of failure? Bluffing is not be learned but to fail then make failure part of why I never bluff because bluffing is a part of who I am because I am never bluffing?
I just get caught within moments when in actuality I was the thinker instead of the knower? I am no more or no less than whom I am at any one point in time simultaneous with itself because the “self” is who I am as a way to acknowledge itself with itself at any one point within any moment a fragment of a moment of a journey of the game absolutely?