A radical idea for NL beginners

B

Brann6

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Total posts
175
Chips
0
Throw away your starting hands charts.

Seriously. Toss 'em.

Stop worrying about AJ or KQ and where to play them. Stop listening to all the talk about "domination" and having a better hand to call with than you'd raise with.

I am dead serious.

Here's why. Almost every single poker author puts a chart in their book or, like in the Harrington series, offers so many hand examples you can create charts. However, and this is the most overlooked point, every single author, without exception, says "it depends." It depends on the way the table's playing, whether you have tons of calling stations or maniacs. It just all depends on....whatever.

That's because NL is more about the players and position than it is about the cards. You'd be better off telling yourself to play "x" range of hands against player A and "y" range of hands against player B than creating charts to play mindlessly against everyone.

In "Hold 'Em for Advanced Players" (designed mostly for limit play) Sklansky even says his starting hand charts will do no more than help you break even. That's a lot of damned work just to break even. Then, to be a better, more dangerous player, you need to break away from the charts as "your game evolves."

Horsehockey!

Why tie yourself to a "system" which you then have to unlearn in order to actually make money?

I'm speaking as one of the "chart lovers" out there. And I've been working damned hard to unlearn things.

There is no system, no rote way of playing, that will make you a winner.

I haven't made a deposit in over 2 years but I do have a few withdrawals. I'm a very, very small winner. Just enough to say I'm not a loser and am better than break-even. But I didn't turn the corner until I started fighting back against the indoctrination of the the "charts".

I'm tellin' ya, toss the charts. You'll never really learn what works for you until you do.

Brann
 
P

peachy00

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Total posts
67
Chips
0
read with interest............when can i expect to see your book on the shelves? keep up the good work.
 
B

Brann6

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Total posts
175
Chips
0
lol peachy.

Wait until I win a major tournament lol.

Seriously though, it was either Dan Harrington, who DID have charts in HOH, or Phil Gordon who said they didn't like starting hand charts but were including them in their book because "it was expected of them."

I've learned more from Gus Hansen's book and the latest from Daniel Negraneau than any of the ones with charts.

Brann
 
PokerVic

PokerVic

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Total posts
822
Chips
0
You're right. It is a radical idea.

As far as I'm concerned, the easiest way for a beginner to break-even at poker is to only play quality starting hands. It's also a good foundation for poker. Start with a simple strategy, then grow and adapt as you learn more. If a beginner starts playing marginal hands right off the bat, I would expect that most of them will lose money at the beginning. And it's going to be a lot more difficult to learn, when you're leaking BR.

I'm sure your way will work, but I wouldn't recommend it for everyone.
 
schnozzinkobenstein

schnozzinkobenstein

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Total posts
127
Chips
0
In every book, the next sentence is always how charts are good for people who have weak post-flop play, and maybe weak pre-flop in addition. Charts are excellent tools for the beginner.

In low stakes games people play with everything pre-flop, and don't know what do with themselves post-flop. The easiest and safest way for a beginner to beat these types of players is to only play the premium hands. Low stakes players are not usually going to pick up on the fact that you are only playing premium hands, so there's no way it hurts you.

Anyone playing high stakes understands that you can't play by the book.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Great post...wait radical means BAD right???

Horrible idea for beginners.
 
bob_tiger

bob_tiger

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Total posts
2,735
Chips
0
Throw away your starting hands charts.

Seriously. Toss 'em.

Stop worrying about AJ or KQ and where to play them. Stop listening to all the talk about "domination" and having a better hand to call with than you'd raise with.

I am dead serious.

Here's why. Almost every single poker author puts a chart in their book or, like in the Harrington series, offers so many hand examples you can create charts. However, and this is the most overlooked point, every single author, without exception, says "it depends." It depends on the way the table's playing, whether you have tons of calling stations or maniacs. It just all depends on....whatever.

That's because NL is more about the players and position than it is about the cards. You'd be better off telling yourself to play "x" range of hands against player A and "y" range of hands against player B than creating charts to play mindlessly against everyone.

In "Hold 'Em for Advanced Players" (designed mostly for limit play) Sklansky even says his starting hand charts will do no more than help you break even. That's a lot of damned work just to break even. Then, to be a better, more dangerous player, you need to break away from the charts as "your game evolves."

Horsehockey!

Why tie yourself to a "system" which you then have to unlearn in order to actually make money?

I'm speaking as one of the "chart lovers" out there. And I've been working damned hard to unlearn things.

There is no system, no rote way of playing, that will make you a winner.

I haven't made a deposit in over 2 years but I do have a few withdrawals. I'm a very, very small winner. Just enough to say I'm not a loser and am better than break-even. But I didn't turn the corner until I started fighting back against the indoctrination of the the "charts".

I'm tellin' ya, toss the charts. You'll never really learn what works for you until you do.

Brann

Well all I can say is very nice, and those charts are just "general idea" of what you should be playing, and I have been working on a sng article, almost done, and I do mention that and that you should adjust and sometimes play outside the charts.
 
katharine

katharine

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 27, 2008
Total posts
218
Chips
0
I can kinda agree with you, b/c quality starting hands are overvalued and can be hard to lay down. And there's a rush when your 5-3 off makes a 3-7 straight, and guy with A-K can't stop betting at the dead flop.

But I have to agree with Vic, I lose more throwing the book away than I do following it.

Besides every beginner's goal (atleast mine) is not to go broke.

Even is okay, broke not so much. LOL

But it is very fun to throw the book away, and play with a wide range of cards. I"m just not that good at it.

LOL

However, I will say this one of these types of players doubled me up in a tourney with nothing but bottom pair, she had (9-6). The pot was almost half her stack.

Branding her reckless, I didn't believe she had the nut straight 10 hands later. (I had Aces up)

She took all those chips back and then some and sent me to the rail.

So maybe I can evolve, later when I get better.
 
zachvac

zachvac

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Total posts
7,832
Chips
0
lol the it depends statement is supposed to be where you deviate from it, so it's still a foundation. While I didn't really learn from a chart or anything (I started sucking by playing too many hands, then started realizing limping in with KJ UTG at a FR table was a losing decision). For example though I'll raise 83o on the button if the blinds are tight, but it hinges on that. There is a starting hand chart in my head from every position, and the presence of more aggressive or more passive players to my left will alter it. A hand chart is definiely a decent way to start though.

Also, lol at the op saying that since a hand chart can only get you even, you should throw it out. That's like running a marathon, saying that if you eat and train right before the race you still won't win, and since you want to win you'll just not eat or train right and instead just wing it and hope to win. Sure just a hand chart won't get you winning millions, but it's a good boost and working on postflop play will help you first off improve the winrate but secondly allow you not only to deviate from the chart but also to get better at knowing when you can deviate.
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
I don't play by a chart. Still, if asked, I could tell you exactly what my default ranges are for opening in any position. I could write this down, at which point I'd have a chart.

The idea that you have to "unlearn" the charts is nonsense. To continue on Zach's sport metaphore, you don't have to unlearn how to walk before you can start running. Running and walking are two different things, but the one is based on the other. You might theoretically learn how to run without knowing how to walk, but it's an unnecessarily difficult way to go about it. Also, you'll fall over a lot and hurt yourself badly.

I think that's about as far as I can take that analogy.
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
I disagree, it does still massively depend on the situation. I played a 6-max table yesterday where I was raising any 2 in the cutoff & button because the two players to my right were running less than 12% VPIP, and fold to c-bet of 85%. Normally J4os is trash, but in that situation, its a +EV move.

True, you don't have to unlearn the chart. But the real deal is to learn why the chart is like it is, and to learn how & why to deviate from it.

Playing ideal poker nevers beats a game for the max, exploiting your opponents does.
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
I disagree, it does still massively depend on the situation.
You disagree with whom? Me?

Having a "default" range in no way shape or form removes the possibility of, for instance, opening any two.

Not having a default range at all to deviate from is, I'd estimate, in at least 99% of all cases a sign that the person isn't a solid player.
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
Looking back, I'm not really sure what I disagreed with. Maybe your sentiment that playing by chart was a good thing & that you disagree with OP? Idk.

The main point I was trying to re-iterate is that the opening poster does have a point. Sure, beginners should have an idea of what hands to play in what positions. But the real key is they need to understand why they're playing those hands, and more importantly when *not* to play them.

Most new players don't understand that the range of hands that you call a raise with, and the range of hands that you make a raise with are VERY different. Same thing with opponents. Against a loose fish limper with postion, my raising range is very different than my usual opening range.

For the longest time I knew that a hand like say A9 was good in late position, but bad in early postion. But I would then still call an UTG raise with a hand like A9 if I was in late position, and proceed to spew chips when an ace flopped. Thank god I was only playing freerolls at that point. ;)

The biggest mistakes beginners make (once they stop being complete fish) is just playing "good cards" and not thinking about their hand's strength in relation to what happening around them.
 
WVHillbilly

WVHillbilly

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Total posts
22,973
Chips
0
Looking back, I'm not really sure what I disagreed with. Maybe your sentiment that playing by chart was a good thing & that you disagree with OP? Idk.

The main point I was trying to re-iterate is that the opening poster does have a point. Sure, beginners should have an idea of what hands to play in what positions. But the real key is they need to understand why they're playing those hands, and more importantly when *not* to play them.

Most new players don't understand that the range of hands that you call a raise with, and the range of hands that you make a raise with are VERY different. Same thing with opponents. Against a loose fish limper with postion, my raising range is very different than my usual opening range.

For the longest time I knew that a hand like say A9 was good in late position, but bad in early postion. But I would then still call an UTG raise with a hand like A9 if I was in late position, and proceed to spew chips when an ace flopped. Thank god I was only playing freerolls at that point. ;)

The biggest mistakes beginners make (once they stop being complete fish) is just playing "good cards" and not thinking about their hand's strength in relation to what happening around them.

So what you're saying is that you read these charts wrong to begin with because they're generally OPENING hand charts, which is a world away from calling an UTG raise hand chart. The best (read least expensive but not necessarily the most profitable) way for a beginner to learn to play is to play ABC poker. If they knew and understood all the concepts you're applying they wouldn't be beginners.
 
c9h13no3

c9h13no3

Is drawing with AK
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Total posts
8,819
Chips
0
So what you're saying is that you read these charts wrong to begin with because they're generally OPENING hand charts, which is a world away from calling an UTG raise hand chart. The best (read least expensive but not necessarily the most profitable) way for a beginner to learn to play is to play ABC poker. If they knew and understood all the concepts you're applying they wouldn't be beginners.
Yeah, I guess so. Beginners just don't understand that there's a huge difference between opening a pot, calling a raise, 3-betting, ect.

And playing ABC poker is different from just looking at your cards and your seat and going "Yep, I'm playing this hand."
 
B

Brann6

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Total posts
175
Chips
0
I guess I'm just dense, a slow learner, whatever. But I've been finding it terribly difficult to break from the starting hand charts. And, from other forums I frequent, I see many, many other posters showing hand histories, talking about hands, etc, that clearly show they were wedded to the charts.

I fully understand one NEEDS to know that KT UTG is pretty weak. But I also believe that most people, like me, can fall into the trap of believing the charts are the be all, end all of NLHE. It's the same mindset that can cause one to play weak tight, fit or fold poker. It's also the mindset that gets players to go broke with TPTK.

Maybe my "radical" idea is more along the lines of become familiar with the charts, but don't fall in love with them. While you're learning what kinds of equity various hands have from what position, learn how to play position, play the player, trust your reads (and notes) even online.

I just think starting hand charts are way over-valued by most players.

Brann
 
C

cAPSLOCK

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Total posts
2,550
Chips
0
It's a good point katharine...

I can kinda agree with you, b/c quality starting hands are overvalued and can be hard to lay down. And there's a rush when your 5-3 off makes a 3-7 straight, and guy with A-K can't stop betting at the dead flop.

Yes.. but the thing is you are gonna get to play those hands every now and then. And on a full moon when the planets line up and the dog is fed you are gonna have just that superflop happen.

Here are two common chances:

1. When you are in the blinds and the table limps to you... boom instant 53o love.

2. When you are button in front of two super tight players in the blinds. You raise your 53o, and BB calls you with AK. Get your flop and you're off to the races.

Point is we should spend as little time as possible playing crappy hands. (Deep, I know)

Learn ABC poker FIRST, then deviate.

Or... Heck.. see every flop for all I care... just do it at MY table.

Interesting topic.

cAPS
 
H

Henreiman

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Total posts
560
Chips
0
The charts are there as GUIDELINES, not more. If you follow them exactly, you're not going to be a winning player, a pro. Think about how many people have read these books. IT'S NOT POSSIBLE. Has anyone here watched High Stakes Poker? These pros play hands like Q6, 104...they play based on how the table is playing, and they create images so that when they get huge hands, they get calls. Now, if you're a beginning player, read the books, know the game...but don't get caught in 'I have AJ I can't fold.' You can fold, depending on your image, raises in front of you, and how many are left to act. Poker pros know the secret: it's not about your cards, its about the other guys' cards
 
R

rodpoker

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Total posts
233
Chips
0
A very interesting post with believeable information from all who responded. Now I'm even more confused than ever! I guess practicing will help me decide the best way for me to play.
 
N

neviu

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Total posts
52
Chips
0
nice post evrybody should just play the way he likes to play evry starting hand can beat a other so no matter what i depends on luck and skill to get those cashflows rolling
 
PokerVic

PokerVic

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Total posts
822
Chips
0
You can't play winning poker 'by the book"

Actually, I think you can. When I first started playing, I read Phil Helmuth's book, and took his supertight strategy to the micro tables. I played limit, only played the top 10 hands, and played them hard and fast. I was immediately profitable. Sure, I wasn't earning much, and I was playing at very low stakes, but I was still making a consistent profit. And this was simply by using an ABC strategy and a hand chart.

No, I wasn't going to make it to the World Series playing only the top ten hands, but I was still technically a winning player.

Of course, as soon as I tried to deviate from the strategy to make my game better, I started posting big losses. Had I not had a base game to fall back to, I might have played way worse and spent a lot more $$$ learning how to play poker.
 
H

hurricanebezy

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Total posts
67
Chips
0
Alot of times...it seems like the person with the hand that gets paid off the most of the time is 24 off suit and etc...
 
widowmaker89

widowmaker89

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Total posts
514
Chips
0
I know many people have already made this point and those that completely disregard it still will but knowing and understanding "the chart" is very important. Knowing what hands to open in early middle and late position is good to know, understanding why is vital.

Knowing a "chart" or more commonly a range of hands in each postion is key to understanding poker. This is only a base to deviate from however, but this being in the beginners section, that is something that will have to be learned. Starting out by knowing what kind of hands you should be playing in positions, or stage of tournys if applicable, is a great base.

Also, following the chart is probably more applicable in tourny play, which is where I beleive you see such charts mostly. I havent read HOH for awhile but I am pretty certain his cash books dont contain any charts, and if they do he definetely makes a very clear statement that it is a base to work off.
 
C

cAPSLOCK

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Total posts
2,550
Chips
0
depends on luck and skill to get those cashflows rolling

Nope.

It depends on skill, patience and perseverance.

The luck is moot. We all get the same luck.
 
C

cAPSLOCK

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Total posts
2,550
Chips
0
Also, following the chart is probably more applicable in tourny play, which is where I beleive you see such charts mostly. I havent read HOH for awhile but I am pretty certain his cash books dont contain any charts, and if they do he definetely makes a very clear statement that it is a base to work off.

First of all. I have never actually used a chart. Don't know if that's good or bad to tell the truth.

But I don't see how the above could possibly be true, and I will make an argument against it now. ;)

I am primarily a ring game player. I play between LAG and TAG

Starting hand selection is vitally important. And position should affect it. Depending on the game, I might limp with KJo on the button but fold it in most other positions.

In ring games the blinds don't go up (until you WANT them to). so you are under no pressure to play loosely. Ever. Whereas in a tourney you have to worry about the blinds eating up your stack, and at some point hand selection gets a little moot. ;)

Looked at this way a "chart" would make even more sense in a ring game.

If I am losing about as fast as possible then I am playing too many hands and ending up chasing after what will be the 2nd best in the end anyway. I will minimize this by making sure my A has a good kicker before I even start.

cAPS
 
Top