shorthanded NL hand

ChuckTs

ChuckTs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Total posts
13,642
Chips
0
2/4 shorthanded hand.
I was playing fairly aggressive, and not quite tight, but not loose either.
2eazy is a decent player, fairly tight and aggressive.
That's why i didn't put him on this hand.
What do you think, fold the turn?
I called because i felt that he raised because he sensed weakness with a small bet and a cold call, but in actuality he called with a garbage hand PF and ended up getting a lucky flop. Then again i got a lucky river.
River check by me is weak too, but i was pretty confused with this hand.
Needless to say, 2eazy exploded with "f*cking fish" and likewise comments :p i replied by asking him how he could call a pf raise with 53?
Opinions?
 

Attachments

  • lucky boat.JPG
    lucky boat.JPG
    83.2 KB · Views: 43
Stick66

Stick66

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Total posts
6,374
Chips
0
Looks like no one else wants to venture a reply here. Guess I'll give it a stab.

Yes, his PF call was typical Titan fish-like. Then he had position on you.

As far as the turn: Well, you were kind of at a decision point that would be hard to argue one way or the other. On one hand, the board was paired and Mr.Fish could have the 3rd (K3 even). On the other, you were somewhat committed and had decent pot odds with your pair.

The river check was not bad. He might have folded anyway.

Just feel lucky you didn't have AA and got rooked.
 
Dorkus Malorkus

Dorkus Malorkus

HELLO INTERNET
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Total posts
12,422
Chips
0
MrSticker said:
The river check was not bad. He might have folded anyway.

You can't use "he might have folded" as a justification for not value betting this river with what is the best hand 99% of the time.
 
Stick66

Stick66

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Total posts
6,374
Chips
0
Dorkus Malorkus said:
You can't use "he might have folded" as a justification for not value betting this river with what is the best hand 99% of the time.

Yes. You are right, DM. I guess I was too short. I should have elaborated like this:

"The river check was not too bad. You could have value bet, but he might have folded anyway. The way it turned out you got to see what this joker had and could use this info against him later. I always like to see what they have and write notes on them for later use."

There. Now completed for debate.
 
titans4ever

titans4ever

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Total posts
1,238
Chips
0
I look at it as "see how much playing something like 35 suited can cost you even if you hit the flop." When you play with low cards like that, there is always the danger of the bigger set, full house, flush or striaght.

He got extremely lucky flop and you just caught up. You were at least a 60/40 leader before the flop. It happens. He should have been out of the hand preflop. You can play a hand perfectly and still lose like he did. He outplayed you on this hand but you out drew him on the cards.
 
C

colin_147

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
May 16, 2005
Total posts
708
Chips
0
He didnt play the hand well at all. I dont see how he can call that kinda raise with that hand

He probably partly called because he had position on you but then he didnt really take advantage of the position because he checked in behind you.

This would have been a difficult read on your opponent because he calls a big preflop bet, checked the flop, then re-raises the river. Unless he has AA, AK or KQ, you are most likely ahead in the hand due to the fact you couldnt vision him calling with a 3 in his hand, or perhaps 77.

I think the only bad mistake you made was checking the river, as at this stage you lose only to 33 in the hole.

Nice pot though
 
ChuckTs

ChuckTs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Total posts
13,642
Chips
0
nobody thought i played this poorly?
im not saying necessarily that i did, but disregarding his strange PF call, i probably should have been more careful and possibly folded his big turn raise with a pair on board.
River play i was just plain confused lol
 
zinzan1000

zinzan1000

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Total posts
1,716
Chips
0
King-Seven can also beat Chucks hand, though highly unlikely he would make the pre-flop raise, call.
But as we can see from the screenshot, this puppy was likely to call with almost any Two cards on this occasion.

zinzan1000
 
gord962

gord962

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Total posts
1,648
Chips
0
I have no problem calling the turn - you have top pair. If he is a tight player like you said, you would never put him on a 3, therefor he is trying to buy the pot.

If you think you are confused about the river, I see Ks full of 3s and 3s full of Ks and neither one of you bet - that's confusing. Both are DAMN good hands that I am definitely betting.

This clown had no busniess being in the hand and as usual, the better hand pre-flop is the winner after the river. Congrats!!!!

BTW, not sure how you are a fish since you had 2 pair after the turn, it's not like you hit a straight or a flush on the river. If he wanted you to fold, he should have went all-in.
 
ChuckTs

ChuckTs

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Total posts
13,642
Chips
0
i know - the river was strange - i think i did one of those autochecks before i even saw the card (or realized what it was) and really should have led out.
 
T

The Shakuni

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Total posts
15
Chips
0
LOL, when you said I was confused about the river, I was like what is he talking about? You have the 2nd nuts in this situation, (quad 3's the only hand that can beat you.) Hate when I do the auto check thingy too.

I got trip 10's on the flop, and the turn resulted in a straight draw (9 10 J Q), so I checked thinking he had straight. I checked the river automatically too, but river was 10 :(. He checked too.
 
Starting Hands - Poker Hand Nicknames Rankings - Poker Hands
Top