nl$100. Turned set, nit decides to wake up.

Sticky enough, im unsure if I can play here. Both villians are reg's -xvd- is a total nit, always plays short on 4/2/inf, initial raiser is looser and a bit of a fish on 20/16/6. Does nits range here really include 2 pair type hands, or is it always 56 ?


pokerstars Game #14582264630: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2008/01/15 - 17:25:04 (ET)
Table 'Anchialos II' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Meff1 ($102.05 in chips)
Seat 2: bradster38 ($141.55 in chips)
Seat 3: Ianmacleod ($112.25 in chips)
Seat 4: -vxd-vxd- ($25.55 in chips)
Seat 5: tenbob ($111.85 in chips)
Seat 6: Rocky5 ($46.25 in chips)
Seat 7: CUGLIONE ($103.30 in chips)
Seat 8: pinchitos ($94.90 in chips)
Ianmacleod: posts small blind $0.50
-vxd-vxd-: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to tenbob [3c 3h]
tenbob: calls $1
Rocky5: calls $1
CUGLIONE: calls $1
pinchitos: folds
Meff1: folds
bradster38: folds
Ianmacleod: calls $0.50
-vxd-vxd-: checks
*** FLOP *** [9s 2d 4h]
Ianmacleod: checks
-vxd-vxd-: checks
tenbob: checks
Rocky5: checks
CUGLIONE: checks
*** TURN *** [9s 2d 4h] [3s]
Ianmacleod: bets $3.25
-vxd-vxd-: raises $4.75 to $8
tenbob: ?

VXD was in the BB and the flop was checked, I would say the two pair could definetly be in his range. Is it possible that he is on a higher set and slow playing as well? Ian's bet looks like a possible weak steal to me try to represent the straight.

i think you have to fold here against a 4/2/inf

Well I definitely think there are some two pairs in there, but there are also other sets and A5/56 as well. I was going to say based on feel we should be comfortable at least calling this, but according to pokerstove we're more behind than I'd thought:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 60.787% 60.51% 00.27% 47926 217.00 { 99, 44, 22, A5s, 94s-92s, 65s, 42s, 32s, A5o, 94o-92o, 65o, 42o, 32o }
Hand 1: 39.213% 38.94% 00.27% 30840 217.00 { 3c3h }


Not only that, but I'm not sure someone that nitty slowplays 92/42 etc on the flop.

Sticky indeed.