A hand worth analysing...

... is one where the hand history doesn't include the result!

Please, PLEASE OMG PLEASE I'M ABOUT TO EXPLODE PUHUHULEAAAAZE don't include the results, and read the sticky at the top regarding hand converters.

Pretty please with sugar on top?

Thanks.

That hand converter NEVER works for me. It either does things like rounds off totals & leaves off parts of the results OR says "Format Not Recognized". Any tips or other converters?

I agree with leaving off the result unless you are asking what you did wrong. The winner's hand must be known in order to analyze how they bet versus how you bet.

MrSticker said:

I agree with leaving off the result unless you are asking what you did wrong. The winner's hand must be known in order to analyze how they bet versus how you bet.

Click to expand...

I disagree vehemently. You don't get to play the hand with his cards face-up, therefore any analysis of the situation should leave out that information. The proper way to play each street when you know what he has is not really up for debate (I hope). Why discuss what we believe his range of hands are, when we KNOW what he has? Why discuss information bets when we already have the information?

Posting what the opponent actually had kills so much of the discussion that posting it to begin with has little to no value.

If I could ask for one other thing, it would be for bad beat stories to be identified in the subject line.

MrSticker said:

That hand converter NEVER works for me. It either does things like rounds off totals & leaves off parts of the results OR says "Format Not Recognized". Any tips or other converters?

Click to expand...

Hmm. What sites do you play?

The conversion I use is to "Bet The Pot" format. Dunno if that has any impact.

I'll keep it in mind next time I post soemthing in the Hand analysis forum. Can I include the results after it's been analyzed?

If anyone wants to have their curiousity satisfied, sure. There's always PM, too, of course.