$800 NLHE Full Ring: Responding to a Donk Bet after a Call/Call

Z

Zybomb

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Total posts
372
Chips
0
$800 NL HE Full Ring: Responding to a Donk Bet after a Call/Call

5/5 Rotation NLHE and PLO

Effective Stacks $800

Hold Em Round

EP opens for $30 , loose-aggro villain calls from MP, I repop to $135 w TT from the CO, folds back around and both players call

Flop K
club.gif
5
heart.gif
3
spade.gif
(Pot $415)

Original Raiser Checks, Loose-Aggro caller bets $200

Standard Fold?

Call with the intention of............

Raise (shove bc of stack sizes) bc of .........

Edit: If you prefer flatting pre, that's fine, and I mix my play up in spots like these depending on the raiser, how many callers, my position his position etc etc, but assume as played
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Chips
0
Is this hand live?

Live players may be retarded enough to bluff here so I may hazard a call if he's the common type of live player who bets any sort of dry flop.

but meh without the specific read I'm folding. Its a multiway 3bet pot, anyone with a braincell isn't bluffing and even if he is a maniac who will fire anything we can't take the heat of another barrel.
 
T

TimmyOtool

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Total posts
95
Chips
0
I'd prefer flatting, play a little pot control in position, but definately fine to 3-bet in your spot as well.

On the flop... I agree with Deco that you can fold here unless you got a read on the opponent.
 
Weregoat

Weregoat

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Total posts
665
Chips
0
Let's take a moment to review the hand from his perspective.

He's in MP with XX.

EP raises to 30. He calls. You raise to $135. EP Calls $105. Villain calls - closing betting for this street.

EP Checks. Villain bets $200. What hands is our villain calling a raise for $30 with, and a reraise for another $105 with? Further - what hands is our villain betting here - is he trying to protect his top pair? FROM WHAT? I can't put our opponent on AK. It would be a stretch to put him on KQ, not the way he played this hand. The flat call of the initial raise rules out hands like AA, KK, QQ, JJ, especially from a loose aggro villain.

I was sitting at a home game with some friends, and they were teaching a newer player. One of the guys at the game says: "Every time you bet, consider it like asking a question -" What question is he asking? "How do I get the most money in this pot?" Or "Are my pocket 7's still good here."

While there is no harm in folding here, consider the following -
By the time action gets to you - the pot is $615. Our effective stack is $665 at this point in time. Seeing as how he's out of position against the last aggressor, if he flopped a set or two pair, he'd be an idiot to bet here.

I'm guessing shoving over here is either going to have our villain make a bad call with a very weak K, or a good fold with a lower pocket pair.

But that's a lot of double doubles there. From the mechanics of the game with low information on our villain, I'd say he's trying to see if his bad hand is worse (maybe as bad as A5.) And a raise here to some degree would not really be BAD - but I highly doubt we're behind, and our villain is more interested in representing the K as that's the card he's worried about on the board.

If he had the K, he should have checked to you to C/R. But it depends on his read on you, and how strong his K is.

I'd say this would be an all-in for me, but I'm not rolled for this kind of game, nor do I have experience with it, but from what I've seen this is a shove/fold scenario, and I expect you to be ahead - unless of course, EP has the K.

I'm guessing he didn't, as it seems to me the action on this hand was most likely fold/fold.
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
Why are you re-raising preflop against an EP open with tens?
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Chips
0
Why are you re-raising preflop against an EP open with tens?

I aint played much Live poker but I've heard they aint remotely positional. If the opener is at all positional I prefer a call here myself as well.
 
R

RAFC24

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Total posts
180
Chips
0
My humongously pertinent micro stakes experience point of view ;)

Fold:

How tight was EP raiser? Had he shown down any hands before? Is he capable of giving up on a flop with an overcard with 99-QQ?

MP villain makes a raise on this uncoordinated flop.
Called a EP raise and flat called a re-raise from LP. How likely is he to hang around with a middle pair like 33 or 55 in a 3-bet flop? I,m not necessarily worried yet because hes so loose.

2 face cards, a king is possible here. 88-JJ...

What kind of card would you like to see on the turn if you call? Any face card is a danger card for us given hes loose but likely not crazy to flat 2 raises in a row. So strong ace, strong king QJ,

A fold is not a bad option here.

calling just lets him draw to 15 face cards that can really hurt us and help his range. Im totally against it. Besides, EP might also jump in after you, with his 4:1 pot odds, unlikely but possible.

Re-raising all in will give him roughly 1.6:1 pot odds which give him odds to race if certain of his face cards havent yet hit the flop.

My preference is a fold, followed by a very I-really-cant-be-sure-where-im-at shove and I wouldnt call, no way. I mean you have 2 people to worry about with a lag who looks like he means business this hand.

But its a tough spot, man.

What ended up happening?
 
Last edited:
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
I aint played much Live poker but I've heard they aint remotely positional. If the opener is at all positional I prefer a call here myself as well.

ok let me clarify, why are we re-raising pocket tens in position? If cutoff opened I think raising from the button is not a good play. I don't see what our raise is supposed to accomplish.
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Chips
0
ok let me clarify, why are we re-raising pocket tens in position? If cutoff opened I think raising from the button is not a good play. I don't see what our raise is supposed to accomplish.

Not only does it get us fold equity but were in very good shape when we are called.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
FE, initiative, we have position, EP opener may feel squeezed (didn't happen), hopefully we isolate (didn't happen) - 3betting here is easy to generally justify whether or not we would have made that play ourselves (3betting is my default play there, I'm biased :D - otherwise I feel like I'm setmining w a hand that's too strong to setmine, but is too weak when overcards flop multiway).
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
Not only does it get us fold equity but were in very good shape when we are called.

This makes no sense. If we're in good shape when called we certainly don't want fold equity.

FE, initiative, we have position, EP opener may feel squeezed (didn't happen), hopefully we isolate (didn't happen) - 3betting here is easy to generally justify whether or not we would have made that play ourselves (3betting is my default play there, I'm biased :D - otherwise I feel like I'm setmining w a hand that's too strong to setmine, but is too weak when overcards flop multiway).

Let's take these one by one:

FE: against hands that we already beat yes

initiative: is an over-rated concept that has nothing to do with equities and ranges. Taking the initiative gives us a stronger range and we have near the bottom of it now whereas if we flat we have near the top of our range.

position: all the more reason not to turn our hand into a bluff and let him re-raise us with hands that beat us and fold hands we beat

EP opener may feel squeezed: no idea what that means or how it pertains to the hand, can you expand on that?

isolate: yes we isolate a player who will call with a much stronger range, congratulations

If when you call you're setmining you're doing something wrong. You have the best hand often and a very good hand to play multiway in position, why would you turn it into a bluff? I'm assuming if he comes over the top we're folding right?

I actually didn't realize the original poster said in the edit that he mixes it up here and he'd rather talk about postflop. Postflop imo is a pretty easy fold. But preflop is just a huge leak unless you have a specific read that he does not fold when we re-raise ever. In that case sure re-raise but then don't talk about fold equity, because the only reason to re-raise preflop here is if we think we have none.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
Let's take these one by one:

FE: against hands that we already beat yes

This depends alot on the ranges of the players involved. I wasn't commenting specifically on this hand, and no read is provided for EP, just saying that this is one of the ways you can justify 3betting here.

initiative: is an over-rated concept that has nothing to do with equities and ranges. Taking the initiative gives us a stronger range and we have near the bottom of it now whereas if we flat we have near the top of our range.

This depends alot on your ranges for 3betting. If TT is the bottom of our 3betting range, then yeah, you probably want to reserve this for plays against middle and late position openers. TT is not at the bottom of my 3betting range.

I primarily play 6max rather than FR, so your statement about initiative being overrated may be accurate (though I doubt it) - but it isn't accurate when applied to 6max. Having position and having the flop probably check around to us (since most players will not donk bet into a 3bettor), and (usually) being allowed the decision whether and how much to bet based on board texture, and to be able to rep a variety of hands, isn't overrated imo.

position: all the more reason not to turn our hand into a bluff and let him re-raise us with hands that beat us and fold hands we beat

If EP 4bets and is really tight, yeah, we're going to have to fold. If EP is very tight and very agg, this isn't a great spot to 3bet. If EP is tight and passive, I love 3betting here.

Again, I was talking in general terms about justifying a 3bet, not applying it to this specific hand.

EP opener may feel squeezed: no idea what that means or how it pertains to the hand, can you expand on that?

Mostly used from the blinds. Someone opens, gets called in one or more spots, from the blinds you 3bet w a pretty wide range. Original opener has a problem - he doesn't know whether the guys who flatted behind will raise if he calls, so unless he's sitting on a hand he's comfortable getting it in with, he will frequently fold. Of course, the guys who flatted behind generally don't have monsters themselves and are playing speculative/implied odds hands to begin with, so they frequently have to fold too. A lot of leveling can go on here depending on the level of thinking of the players.

This is part of the FE thing.

isolate: yes we isolate a player who will call with a much stronger range, congratulations

You really want to play TT multiway? I'd rather play TT HU in position than multiway. And when you say "stronger range", you need to take into account both our ranges - how strong does he perceive our range to be, is he only continuing w QQ+? How about AJ+? If he knows that I 3bet 10% of the time, he's not going to put me on KK+, AK - so he shouldn't be calling or 4betting only when he's beating that range.

Again, I play 6max where weaker hand ranges are more commonly played from EP, and where 3betting stats tend to be higher.

If when you call you're setmining you're doing something wrong. You have the best hand often and a very good hand to play multiway in position, why would you turn it into a bluff? I'm assuming if he comes over the top we're folding right?

It's not a bluff. I'm not putting him specifically on a range of KK+,AK. If he 4bets I'll put him on that range, I don't think we can continue.

However, 4bets are relatively rare, unless there's a history between the players (in other words, 4bets tend to be say QQ+, AK). A lot of people will call 3bets oop w ranges that we are not far behind (and in some cases w ranges that we're ahead of w TT). Playing bloated pots in position with players who play poorly in 3bet pots is good.

Note that here there's no 4bet here, both players call, creating this exact situation. The donk bet from EP is obviously a bad sign, repping an AK or better type hand, but that's a matter of the cards that hit the flop.

I actually didn't realize the original poster said in the edit that he mixes it up here and he'd rather talk about postflop. Postflop imo is a pretty easy fold. But preflop is just a huge leak unless you have a specific read that he does not fold when we re-raise ever. In that case sure re-raise but then don't talk about fold equity, because the only reason to re-raise preflop here is if we think we have none.

There are very good things that can happen in position postflop in 3bet pots, I wouldn't dismiss that so easily.
..
 
Z

Zybomb

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Total posts
372
Chips
0
Just getting back to this thread now.

I'm gunna include some of my own comments (post) and see what people think -- and also address some of the preflop action since it has generated some discussion.

To get this out of the way, preflop is irrelevant. We can flat, we can 3 bet. Neither is bad unless we have a next to impossible ultra strong range read (i.e PFR will only open JJ+ and never fold an overpair postflop, in which case we should always call and never 3 bet obv). This situation is obviously true with approx 0% of villains.

Someone mentioned 3 betting TT is a leak here. A much bigger leak would be having a 3bet range of {QQ,KK,AA,AK}. A lot depends on our normal preflop tendencies -- are we squeezing 87s in this spot some of the time? Does PFR fold to 3 bets a lot? Does he call a lot pre but likes to make "hero folds" a lot unless he smashes? Will 3 betting isolate us? etc etc etc

To address the what is accomplished by TT 3 bet question, we can isolate the PFR with position, fold out tons of coin tosses (AQ, KJ etc) extract value from overcards that miss, bluff JJ (or QQ if they don't 4 bet it) out of the pot on scary boards, keep random hands behind us from enterign the pot cheaply and likely buy ourselves the button as well....all good things.

As originally stated in this spot I'll mix it up and flat sometimes and 3 bet sometimes... but either is fine, and the decision is on the flop...

So what's our play here given that we 3 bet pre?

Do people really give villain a strong range here with Donking into me knowing I'm likely to bet a lot of flops and possibly trap dead money in between me and him with the 3rd player? Like on this board the only big hands are 33 or 55 and would he really donk either of those into us rather than check? Sure villain might have like KQ or something which beats us (and might bet) but he should fold that if we shove if we were deeper. Like with an extra 200 behind I think shoving in this spot picks it up a ton, folding out random Kings and a bunch of bluffs, 76/64 and pairs we beat. Sure we aren't going to get called by worse hands... but we're bluffing and playing villains hand not ours. I think showdown value (we conceivably could have the best hand and win a showdown here) some of the times hurts us bc it stops us from making plays. Villain never has AK AA KK here since he just call/called so we're really only worried about 55 or 33 and the likelihood of him donking those hands is very very low imo. The problem here is stack size though since if we shove KQ might just bleh call since it isn't that much more and the pot is big. I think esp an aggro villain's range is like gutshots mid pairs and random bluffs a ton more than 55 or 33.

Sure we do have the original raiser still in the hand and still behind us which should probably factor into our decision also.... and also villain could easily relevel us and call with Kx under the thinking that I probably am not gunna shove AK/AA (or better) to try and continue to get more money out of his bluffs / get him to continue value betting his weaker Kx hands.

Anyway I ended up folding, but kind of disliked my play.

Further discussion/comments/responses welcome
 
KardKlub

KardKlub

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Total posts
527
Chips
0
Im with weregoat. Shove or fold. Stacks are to close to pot to just call.

+ I would shove myself, he's giving away his relative position, why would he do that with a great hand? Surely he'd get your c-bet first then maybe some dead money from another caller before raising his made hand.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
Sorry about the digression on pf...

I hate calling (calling puts more of our stack in than I'm usually willing to fold later), I hate folding to MP (cuz of your read), and I'm not keen on raising w EP left to act (cuz I'm worried he checked to the raiser w a Kx hand, or JJ/QQ, and will feel obligated to call given spr).

Toss up imo - call > fold > raise - I'm okay w any of the three actions, cuz I hate all three. I agree it's an interesting hand postflop.
 
Deco

Deco

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2009
Total posts
2,544
Chips
0
Oh shiznit were deep aint we?
I flat preflop. Even against live players I aint comfortable stacking off TT for 160BBs postflop.

I still don't mind the 3bet. Your 3bet sizing and the original pfr size has mostly made up for this pot being deep, you've got abit unlucky, the combination of the flop and the pot being multiway has made what will normally be an easy decision a difficult one.

But yer as long as the guys completely positional and isn't likely to double barrel his air here am happy to call. If he's a spewtard or knows to be tight UTG we need to gtfo of here.

This makes no sense. If we're in good shape when called we certainly don't want fold equity.

With TT I really don't mind hands we beat such as 33 or 45s folding because were simply not going to make anymore money off them.
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
slycebnew you made a lot of good points I'm going to think about it a bit then get back to you. One big thing though is I did not mean TT is bottom of our 3-bet range I meant value 3-bet range. Of course I would 3-bet hands such as 47s/K8s and stuff that can not profitably call but we can turn into a bluff and will flop semi-well when they do call us oop. I've just always been taught that generally if we should hardly ever be 3-betting pairs unless it is for value meaning they will flat super wide or else we feel comfortable stacking off if they 4-bet us. You did make some good points though I'll think about it.

But for example in this hand say they check to us. What do we do then? Betting definitely turns it into a bluff. Check it back and hope they let us show it down? Even if this were a HU pot it's just such an awkward spot. TT is just going to play so much better in a single-raised pot imo because the opponents will have much wider ranges. But I will think about this and maybe try 3-betting stuff like this at the tables and see how it goes.
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
With TT I really don't mind hands we beat such as 33 or 45s folding because were simply not going to make anymore money off them.

You don't think he will likely cbet many boards that we can call at least one?
 
Top