50nl; 66 overfull vs c-bet
This is spawning from this thread
. Basically I tried to get a specific answer to a general question, and that just lead me to actually posting this hand.
Anyways, villain is a 14/12/4.5 tag after about 250 hands and we don't have much history. I've got similar stats, couldn't tell you exactly what they were on that table, but similar.
Anyways, what's the best line here? I pretty much listed all the pros and cons in that other thread...
Also, how does this change if we've got lots of history with villain? For example, I'm the type of player who will pretty much never raise that flop without a set here. With 88 or even my bluffs (let's say 9Ts for example), I'm usually floating the flop and betting when checked to on the turn, or maybe even checking behind for a cheap showdown (w/88).
If I raise a thinking reg player, basically announcing 66, will he be able to fold overpairs often enough to make slowplaying a better candidate?
I may be thinking too deep here, but I'm preparing to move up in stakes sometime soon and expect to run into a lot more regulars a lot more frequently, so I think I'll have to make some pretty big adjustments...
No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (8 handed)
Hero is MP2 with 6
UTG raises to $2
, 2 folds
, Hero calls $2, 4 folds
, 5 (2 players)
UTG bets $3.25
, Hero ...