$50NL 6-max: I give you no respect fish, k?

Yes, I know, boring preflop spot. But this is as interesting a hand as I could come up with. 50$NL is stupid fishy, so was playing nothing but ABC pokerzzzz.

Villain is an idiot, with typical idiot stats, and he does typical idiot stuff. But if you must know he's a 53/21/30% with a 3-bet percentage of 0% over 19 hands (whatever that's worth). In fact, the whole table is drooling everywhere, its really gross.

I'm like, rawr, and taking all of their monies.

BB: $51.15 (102.3 bb)
UTG: $52.40 (104.8 bb)
MP: $121.14 (242.3 bb)
CO: $11.65 (23.3 bb)
BTN: $37.30 (74.6 bb)
Hero (SB): $81.15 (162.3 bb)

Pre-Flop: Hero is SB with 8 8
MP posts BB out of position, UTG calls $0.50, MP checks, CO calls $0.50, BTN calls $0.50, Hero raises to $3.75, 4 folds, BTN raises to $7, Hero raises to $81.15 and is all-in, BTN calls $30.30 and is all-in

Dang, I like your style, can you teach me your kick-a** ways? I like it a lot against that villian.....tell me you took all his monies!

I like it, I think this is a lower PP a lot of the time and maybe something like AT or AJ. No monster is limping behind 3 limpers and then 3betting a raiser. If someone is stupid enough to limp a monster behind 3 other limpers, they aren't 3betting it once the blind raises it.

I believe I would just complete with the 8s here, although I think it's close. When you consider how fishy this table is, I don't think a squeeze is going to take down the pot very often preflop with this many people in. You'll end up being out of position post flop with a pair of 8's against calling stations a lot. So I wouldnt mind just completing here and playing this multiway and stacking a fish with top pair when I hit my set. But again, I believe its very close as I would definately squeeze with a hand like 10s here that has slightly more relative value, and most likely 9's as well.

i'd play it the same. like bw said, this is a smaller pair sometimes, KQ/KJ is a big candidate, some kind of pretty ace. if you're beat, i expect it to be quite rarely and something like 99

I'm pretty sure i've seen 50nl villains play AA like villain here. But most of the time villain will have an underpair here and you'll be fine.

i have seen some goofy limp behinds with AA/KK, but at least those are usually nits who play so badly already that raising would define their range pretty well (because they're like 30/4) and limping, while still terrible, at least lends them deception

but for this guy to limp a big hand behind with his super spewtarded image would be so lolbad i can't even conceive it. plz tell me he had AA so my eyes can pop out of my head

25nl AA utg

I am still liking this as played