LD1977
Legend
Silver Level
BB ($5)
Hero (UTG) ($6.26)
UTG+1 ($1.75)
MP1 ($3.47)
MP2 ($10.75)
CO ($9.20)
Button ($5)
SB ($14.88)
Both players are pretty unknown, note that stats were probably a bit different when hand was played, these are stats I have on them now but there is very little difference as far as VPIP/PRF goes:
SB looks like a fish: 43 / 23 / 8% 3bet over 174 hands.
BB looks decent: 14 / 10 / 3.4% 3bet over 288 hands.
This is my thinking:
1) When BB 3bets I conclude he wants to get rid of me and play with the fish while in position, so I flat with the idea of attacking (probably raise shoving) any flop with no overcards (and accept coolers from KK+ and flopped sets). Fish will call more often than not in my experience since he won't be able to fold if he has a worse pair.
2) When fish spazzes out I just
and when BB folds I am a happy man and snap it off instantly since this is either AA or a worse hand, and more often the latter (he has a big stack and is probably feeling lucky ).
The problem I am having is deciding if the original flat (with the whole "attack flop" idea) is correct or not here? Lets assume I have more hands on both so stats are more reliable but not enough to know how often BB squeezes. He has to see me as decent - I do fold a lot to 3bets generally but not really much if I open from EP (since I have pretty good range there).
Preflop: Hero is UTG with Q
, Q
Hero raises to $0.20, 5 folds, SB calls $0.18, BB raises to $0.80, Hero calls $0.60, SB raises to $10.10, 1 fold, Hero calls $5.46 (All-In)
Flop: ($13.32) 6
, 2
, 4
(2 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: ($13.32) J
(2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($13.32) 5
(2 players, 1 all-in)
Total pot: $13.32 | Rake: $0.66
Results below:
Hero (UTG) ($6.26)
UTG+1 ($1.75)
MP1 ($3.47)
MP2 ($10.75)
CO ($9.20)
Button ($5)
SB ($14.88)
Both players are pretty unknown, note that stats were probably a bit different when hand was played, these are stats I have on them now but there is very little difference as far as VPIP/PRF goes:
SB looks like a fish: 43 / 23 / 8% 3bet over 174 hands.
BB looks decent: 14 / 10 / 3.4% 3bet over 288 hands.
This is my thinking:
1) When BB 3bets I conclude he wants to get rid of me and play with the fish while in position, so I flat with the idea of attacking (probably raise shoving) any flop with no overcards (and accept coolers from KK+ and flopped sets). Fish will call more often than not in my experience since he won't be able to fold if he has a worse pair.
2) When fish spazzes out I just
and when BB folds I am a happy man and snap it off instantly since this is either AA or a worse hand, and more often the latter (he has a big stack and is probably feeling lucky ).The problem I am having is deciding if the original flat (with the whole "attack flop" idea) is correct or not here? Lets assume I have more hands on both so stats are more reliable but not enough to know how often BB squeezes. He has to see me as decent - I do fold a lot to 3bets generally but not really much if I open from EP (since I have pretty good range there).
Preflop: Hero is UTG with Q
Hero raises to $0.20, 5 folds, SB calls $0.18, BB raises to $0.80, Hero calls $0.60, SB raises to $10.10, 1 fold, Hero calls $5.46 (All-In)
Flop: ($13.32) 6
Turn: ($13.32) J
River: ($13.32) 5
Total pot: $13.32 | Rake: $0.66
Results below:
SB had A
, K
(high card, Ace).
Hero had Q
, Q
(one pair, Queens).
Outcome: Hero won $12.66
Hero had Q
Outcome: Hero won $12.66
Last edited:
