Originally Posted by Deco
We cannot just 3bet 30%, even against morons with huge F3B%s the highest I'll go is 20%, against someone who will adjust.
All the other stuff you said was painfully obvious, so I'll just address this point.
You have arbitrarily decided to draw that line at 20% for the people who fold the most. And haven't really given a reason for why it should be 10%, 20%, 0%, whatever.
What I'm getting at isn't a poker thing, it's a debate/logic thing. It's like someone asking "why does my drink get cold when you put ice in it" and you responding with "the ice removes heat from the drink, duh". Its a non-explanation.
Essentially, the opening post asked "Why can't I 3-bet ATs from the blinds?" And Baudib responded with "Because we call with it." It's not a reason for calling, 3-betting, or anything really.
What you need to provide the OP with is a real reason for saying "Oh, we can 3-bet AQ for value, but everything else isn't good enough against this villain". And that reason pertains to flop equity in 3-bet pots, ect. ect.
I might be crazy in many other ways, and I might've spent too many years on debate team. I usually don't type out long responses either, because I'm usually on my tablet
. So I probably don't explain myself as much as I should anymore. So this may just be me hastily writing things. But yeah, I'd like to see better advice given is what I guess I'm getting at.